11.07.2015 Views

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

318 De-yi Feng, Ming-zhou Lin, and Kun-yuan ZhuangTaking a suitable weight vector W = (W1, W2, W3) for three factors, we mayobtain <strong>the</strong> fuzzy miiltifactorial evaluation on <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong> formula:P = W .Q = (Pi, P2, ..., P,) (7)where tlie syiribol "0" denotes product of CV and Q.According to tlie principle of clioosiiig <strong>the</strong> closest approach, we may obtain <strong>the</strong>optimal source mechanism of an historical earthquake.The formulas (4) and (7) represent two possible ways of fuzzy niultifactorialevaluat ion.3.8. ExampleAs an example, we have studied <strong>the</strong> source mechanism of <strong>the</strong> 1920 Haiyuan(M = 8.5) earthquake. The original macroscopic phenomena were taken <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong>Seisniological Institute of Lanzhou and <strong>the</strong> Seismological Bureau of Ningxia Region(1980). Based on <strong>the</strong>se phenomena, we obtained tlie data for compressional andrarefactional points (Table 3). By use of <strong>the</strong> mentioned method, we derived fourmodels of source mechanism (Figure 3). The optimal model of source mechanismis Model 1 in Figure 3. The nodal plane trends N 17" W dipping SW at an angleof 80°, <strong>the</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r nodal plane strikes N 86' E, dipping NW at 39", <strong>the</strong> principalcompressional stress axis has an orientation of N 72" W with dip angle of 41", and<strong>the</strong> principle dilatational stress axis is oriented N 45' E with dip angle of 35".4. Fuzzy Description of Macroscopic Criteria for Recognizing PaleoseismicEvents4.1. MethodSo far, tlie data relevant to recognition criteria of paleoseisniic events have beenaccuniulating, but all <strong>the</strong>se criteria are often described by very fuzzy languages. Wenow attempt to describe <strong>the</strong>se criteria by use of membership functions with landfalland landslide as examples.(1) Landfall. We take <strong>the</strong> following five fuzzy subsets as <strong>the</strong> recognition criteria fora paleoearthquake:NU1: In tlie case of intact rocks such as granite, and massive limestone withoutmickle iriterlayer, break plienomena and tlie trace of river erosion suggestthat great collapse occurred.NU2: The size of <strong>the</strong> collapsed body is great, <strong>the</strong> valley bottom of <strong>the</strong> collapsedN sphere is very deep, and its depth often equals to 300-500 m.U,: The collapsed body is displaced very far, its distance could be far<strong>the</strong>r thantwelve kilometers.NU4: On <strong>the</strong> end levee of <strong>the</strong> collapsed body high-dip-angle steep gradient ap-N peared, it is higher than <strong>the</strong> background by 50-100 m.Us: The collapse occurred at a slope whose angle is smaller than 30 degrees.Then, we may consider <strong>the</strong> paleoeartliquake as a fuzzy set:N Nu = u1 u z2 u c3 u 34 u 35,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!