11.07.2015 Views

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Catalogue of Chinese Earthquakes (M 2 6.5) 1193.4.3. The magnitudes given in Duda’s (1965) catalogue are quite complicated.Most of <strong>the</strong> values were adopted <strong>from</strong> Gutenberg (1954, 1956) and Richter (1958).For Chinese earthquakes, excluding those adopted directly <strong>from</strong> Gutenberg (1954) ,statistical results show that <strong>the</strong> magnitude value is 0.25 too high on <strong>the</strong> average(n = 30, (T = k0.25).3.4.4. For <strong>the</strong> Taiwan region, <strong>the</strong> earthquake catalogues used are: History ofTaiwan earthquakes (Taipai Observatory, 1936), Catalogue of major earthquakeswhich occurred in <strong>the</strong> vicinity of Japan (1885-1950) (Central Meteorological Observatoryof Japan, 1952), and Seismicity of Taiwan and some related problems(Hsu, 1971). In History of Taiwan earthquakes, earthquakes are divided into “obvious,”“moderate,” “smaU,” and ‘local” according to <strong>the</strong>ir strength. Statisticalstudy shows that <strong>the</strong>y correspond to 7, 6+, 5$, and 4; of G-R magnitude scalerespectively. In Catalogue of major earthquakes which occurred in <strong>the</strong> vicinity ofJapan (1885-19501, magnitude values for earthquakes before 1930 were converted<strong>from</strong> Kawasumi’s magnitude, MK. They differ greatly <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> G-R scale valuesand were not adopted. For earthquakes after 1931, average magnitudes obtained<strong>from</strong> data of six Japanese stations were added and can be used for reference.HSU’S (1971) catalogue is composed of two parts. In Appendix 11, <strong>the</strong> magnitudesfor earthquakes before 1935 are mostly Kawasumi’s magnitude or HSU’S estimation.Statistics show that for <strong>the</strong> years before 1925, <strong>the</strong> magnitudes given differ greatly<strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> G-R scale with a correction of +0.43 (n = 12, o = &0.34); for 1925to 1935, <strong>the</strong> deviation is smaller, with a correction of +0.1 (n = 9, o = *0.17).In Appendix I, <strong>the</strong> magnitudes of earthquakes after 1936 were determined <strong>from</strong>observational data by Hsu using complicated magnitude scales. For earthquakesbetween 1936 and 1948, <strong>the</strong> result of least square regression isMs = 1.49 MH - 2.97 (n = 63, 7 = 0.80, CT = f 0.29), (6)where MH is HSU’S estimation of magnitude. It can be seen <strong>from</strong> Figure 4 thatMH = 5.2, Ms = 4;; and when MH < 6, <strong>the</strong> correction is negative.3.4.5. In <strong>the</strong> International Seismological Summary, magnitude, amplitude andperiod data are not given. For <strong>the</strong>se earthquakes, we estimate <strong>the</strong>ir magnitudes<strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> maximum distance of P-wave observation, Ap. Considering <strong>the</strong> probabledifference in P-wave attenuation for earthquakes occurring in mainland China andin Taiwan Province and its neighbouring seas, <strong>the</strong>y were treated separately (Figure5). For Ap < 105”, <strong>the</strong> following emperical formulas were obtained:for mainland China, andMs = 0.0119Ap” + 4.89 (7)Ms = 0.0179Ap” + 4.23, (8)for Taiwan Province and its neighboring seas (- 5 < Ms < - 6).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!