The Impact of Pesticides - Academy Publish

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 5. Map showing sampling areas of surface soil in Hanoi, VietnamRESULTS AND DISSUSIONContamination statusContamination status of DDTThe concentrations of ΣDDT (p,p’-DDT, p,p’-DDE, p,p’-DDD) in soil samplesfrom Hanoi in 2006 are shown in table 4. DDT and its metabolites were detected in47 of 60 soil samples.AcademyPublish.org - The Impact of Pesticides300
Table 4. Concentrations of DDT and its metabolites (ng g -1 dw) in soil samples fromHanoi23.42 –Location p,p’-DDE p,p’-DDD p,p’-DDT ΣDDTA. Agricultural areasSocSon 1 48.85 –17.75 – 94.25 – 163.75(67.93) (c) (32.68) (22.73)(a)93.16 45.75 24.42 (123.33)DongAnh132.86 –49.78(41.06)15.43 –25.87(21.09)13.7 – 23.49(18.24)62.27 – 97.66(80.39)GiaLam 1 35.58 –47.92(42.23)Hanoicentre 114.19 –28.17(22.36)TuLiem 1 29.94 –83.75(46.56)ThanhTri 1 N.D (d) –97.54(48.83)B. Industrial and urban areasSocSon 2(b)N.D – 36.82(24.53)N.D – 19.43(7.59)DongAnh2GiaLam 2 N.D – 35.19(13.63)Hanoi N.D – 13.68centre 2 (5.04)TuLiem 2 14.84 –19.48(17.23)ThanhTri 2 N.D – 13.44(8.83)16.38 –21.44(19.75)8.12 – 13.15(11.46)15.74 –45.29(23.83)N.D – 49.36(21.98)N.D – 17.88(11.68)N.D – 9.82(3.89)N.D – 16.83(6.18)N.D – 5.92(1.99)5.88 – 8.59(7.46)N.D – 4.92(3.23)15.47 –18.98(17.53)0.06 – 5.38(3.53)12.83 –40.96(21.43)N.D – 24.93(12.26)N.D – 13.93(7.65)N.D – 9.18(3.43)N.D – 15.45(5.43)N.D – 5.16(1.75)5.62 – 7.72(6.85)N.D – 4.39(2.93)67.43 – 88.34(79.47)22.36 – 46.44(37.35)58.34 – 168.27(91.83)N.D – 171.83(81.06)N.D – 67.82(43.85)N.D – 38.24(19.93)N.D – 67.47(25.23)N.D – 24.76(8.79)26.34 – 35.18(31.53)N.D – 22.57(14.95)(a)SocSon 1: agricultural areas of SocSon; (b) SocSon 2: industrial and urban areas ofSocSon. It is similar with DongAnh, GiaLam, Hanoi centre, Tu Liem and ThanhTri;(c) min – max (mean) value. (d) N.D: not detected.ΣDDT was detected in relatively high concentrations in Hanoi agricultural areas.The ΣDDT concentrations ranged from N.D to 171.83 ng g -1 . The mean ΣDDTconcentration (89.86 ± 47.17 ng g -1 ) was a little lower than the maximal allowableAcademyPublish.org - The Impact of Pesticides301
Page 1 and 2:
The Impactof PesticidesEdited by:Pr
Page 3 and 4:
Other access free resources from Ac
Page 5 and 6:
The Impact of PesticidesPrepared an
Page 7 and 8:
Table of Contentsp.203-p.224 Behavi
Page 9 and 10:
About authorspublished by Elsevier.
Page 11 and 12:
About authorsof medical researchers
Page 13:
About authorsdifferent spatial scal
Page 16 and 17:
About authorsEducation:Bachelor’s
Page 18 and 19:
About authorsSensors - A Nanotechno
Page 20 and 21:
Section 1HUMAN EXPOSURE TO PESTICID
Page 22 and 23:
ecently explored on preliminary stu
Page 24:
individuals within 1 day (Jokanovic
Page 27 and 28:
occupational environmental health r
Page 30 and 31:
must be considered, since effective
Page 34 and 35:
Jensen BH, Petersen A, and Christen
Page 36 and 37:
Ragas AMJ, and Huijbregts MAJ (1998
Page 38 and 39:
Weichenthal S, Moase C, and Chan P
Page 40 and 41:
human poisoning, general acute symp
Page 42 and 43:
Management of the cholinergic syndr
Page 44 and 45:
1982; Lotti, 1992; Jokanović et al
Page 46 and 47:
exposed populations, revealed high
Page 48 and 49:
DiazepamBenzodiazepines are CNS dep
Page 50 and 51:
Among the many classes of oximes in
Page 52 and 53:
inhibited by dichlorvos (a dimethox
Page 54 and 55:
Dawson, 1995). It appears that the
Page 56 and 57:
Eddleston M, Eyer P, Worek F, Moham
Page 58 and 59:
Jokanović M, Kosanović M (2010b).
Page 60 and 61:
Ray DE (1998). Chronic effects of l
Page 62 and 63:
Worek F, Eyer P, Kiderlen D, Thierm
Page 64 and 65:
developing countries is due to suic
Page 66 and 67:
count and morphology, as well as se
Page 68 and 69:
PON1 modulation of genetic damageFe
Page 70 and 71:
elationship between OP exposure and
Page 72 and 73:
Blatter-Garin MC, James RW, Dussoix
Page 74 and 75:
Hung RJ, Hall J, Brennan P, Boffett
Page 76 and 77:
Rojas-García AE., Solís-Heredia M
Page 78 and 79:
Occupational Exposure to Pesticides
Page 80 and 81:
considered as conditions typical of
Page 82 and 83:
observed adverse health outcome. Su
Page 84 and 85:
within cells can oxidize biomolecul
Page 86 and 87:
of the study. A face-to-face questi
Page 88 and 89:
PesticidesFungicideInsecticide-Nema
Page 90 and 91:
Table 4. Mixtures of pesticides use
Page 92 and 93:
In pesticide applicators, Table 7 s
Page 94 and 95:
DISCUSSIONThe agricultural workers
Page 96 and 97:
changes in the antioxidant enzyme C
Page 98 and 99:
Bajpayee, M.; Pandey, A. K.; Parmar
Page 100 and 101:
Environmental health criteria 155.
Page 102 and 103:
Palus, J.; Rydzynski, K.; Dziubalto
Page 104 and 105:
Singh, N.P.; McCoy, M.T.; Tice, R.R
Page 106 and 107:
INTRODUCTIONPopulations may be occu
Page 108 and 109:
exposure scenarios on the basis of
Page 110 and 111:
not present adverse health effects
Page 112 and 113:
greenhouse workers exposed to malat
Page 114 and 115:
Paraoxon is then either metabolized
Page 116 and 117:
cyclohexene-1,2-dicarboximide, CAS
Page 118 and 119:
metabolite of phthalates, such that
Page 120 and 121:
scenarios were simulated, assuming
Page 122 and 123:
Table 2. Biological reference value
Page 124 and 125:
References N a urinarybiomarkeStudi
Page 126 and 127:
Figure 2. Representation of a BRV d
Page 128 and 129:
Figure 4. Conceptual representation
Page 130 and 131:
Figure 6 Conceptual representation
Page 132 and 133:
REFERENCESACGIH, 2011. Documentatio
Page 134 and 135:
Bradway, D.E., Shafik, T.M., 1977.
Page 136 and 137:
EPA, 1999b. Registration Eligibilit
Page 138 and 139:
Hines, C.J., Deddens, J.A., Jaycox,
Page 140 and 141:
McCollister, S.B., Kociba, R.J., Hu
Page 142 and 143:
Verberk, M.M., Brouwer, D.H., Brouw
Page 144 and 145:
important IGFBP for binding IGF-1 i
Page 146 and 147:
secretion of IGF-1 (Tannheimer et a
Page 148 and 149:
FIGURESFig. 1. An “hormetic” ef
Page 150 and 151:
Landi F, Capoluongo E, Russo A, Ond
Page 152 and 153:
Smith WJ, Underwood LE, Clemmons DR
Page 154 and 155:
Section 2PESTICIDES IN THEENVIRONME
Page 156 and 157:
vicinity of subsoil waters and ther
Page 158 and 159:
Hieracium pilosella, southernwood -
Page 160 and 161:
formed clusters (Figure 3). Ultrast
Page 162 and 163:
Fig. 5. Fragment of hepatocyte of t
Page 164 and 165:
Szarek, J, Skibniewska, K, Wojtacka
Page 166 and 167:
negative effects (ZALUCKI et al., 2
Page 168 and 169:
Figure 2. Appropriated sampling pro
Page 170 and 171:
Figure 4. Illustration of the conse
Page 172 and 173:
(HAILE et al., 1998). Earlier resul
Page 174 and 175:
Table 1. Distribution of the applic
Page 176 and 177:
Means followed by the same letter i
Page 178 and 179:
(involving pests and natural enemie
Page 180 and 181:
efore the pest emergence and their
Page 182 and 183:
Table 3 (continuation)…AcademyPub
Page 184 and 185:
Table 5. Effect of different fungic
Page 186 and 187:
Table 6. Magament used including do
Page 188 and 189:
adopted by Brazilian soybean grower
Page 190 and 191:
Pickle, C.S.; Caviness, C.E. Yield
Page 192 and 193:
This chapter reports on Dutch surfa
Page 194 and 195:
several different occasions at any
Page 196 and 197:
The greatest number of pesticides a
Page 198 and 199:
Accumulated ExceedanceIt is useful
Page 200 and 201:
For the years 2003-2009 the calcula
Page 202 and 203:
Bonzini S, Verro R, Otto S, Lazzaro
Page 204 and 205:
atios of the pesticide amounts in t
Page 206 and 207:
Table 1. (Cont.) Runoff ratios of p
Page 208 and 209:
mefenacet and simetrin were observe
Page 210 and 211:
Table 2. (Cont.)Pesticide concentra
Page 212 and 213:
Table 2. (Cont.)Pesticide concentra
Page 214 and 215:
Fig. 3. Typical weekly variation of
Page 216 and 217:
(BAM) in water (Pukkila et al. 2009
Page 218 and 219:
Table 5. Concentrations of pesticid
Page 220 and 221:
Table 6. Maximum concentrations of
Page 222 and 223:
Iwafune, T, Inao, K, Horio, T, Iwas
Page 224 and 225:
Suzuki, M, Takemine, S, Yoshida, M,
Page 226 and 227:
factor, etc. Levels of pesticides i
Page 228 and 229:
factor of 10 above ambient sea wate
Page 230 and 231:
weight sample. Minimum were shown f
Page 232 and 233:
Figure 3. DDTs in mussel samples fo
Page 234 and 235:
Figure 5. HCB in mussel samples for
Page 236 and 237:
Figure 8. Methoxychlor in mussel sa
Page 238 and 239:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTAuthors thank UNEP/M
Page 240 and 241:
Pesticide Risk Index of Del Azul Wa
Page 242 and 243:
on that presented in Swanson et al.
Page 244 and 245:
eference value for that substance.
Page 246 and 247:
predict the aquatic toxicity of a s
Page 248 and 249:
Calculation Model of Aggravating Fa
Page 250 and 251: To estimate the values of Human Hea
Page 252 and 253: water in comparison with the durati
Page 254 and 255: Cypermethrin (95 th percentile (P 9
Page 256 and 257: Table 8 shows the results of the De
Page 258 and 259: are many ranking systems of dangero
Page 260 and 261: REFERENCESAres J. (2004). “Estima
Page 262 and 263: Mackay D. and Paterson S. (1991).
Page 264 and 265: Long-term Monitoring of Pesticides
Page 266 and 267: Sampling sites of the survey in 200
Page 268 and 269: than those in Lake Biwa and Seta Ri
Page 270 and 271: Fig. 7 Detection of fungicides in R
Page 272 and 273: Fig. 11 Detection of herbicides in
Page 274 and 275: Monitoring of pesticides in Yanamun
Page 276 and 277: A measured volume (1000 mL) of the
Page 278 and 279: SimetrynePretilachlorConcentration
Page 280 and 281: Fig. 18 Maximum concentrations of t
Page 282 and 283: Ecological risk assessmentFig. 20 Y
Page 284 and 285: REFERENCESAgradi E, Baga R, Cillo F
Page 286 and 287: Time Trend Variation of Selected Pe
Page 288 and 289: Table 1. Physical and chemical prop
Page 290 and 291: marketed under variety of trade nam
Page 292 and 293: Figure 3. Long-term trends of globa
Page 294 and 295: laboratory animals fed or injected
Page 296 and 297: fed for a lifespan at 5-1,600 mg/kg
Page 298 and 299: Soil samplingSoil sampling was foll
Page 302 and 303: concentration (MAC) in surface soil
Page 304 and 305: Table 7. Concentrations of HCH isom
Page 306 and 307: Shanghai and Guanting Reservoir (Ch
Page 308 and 309: Contrary to the results of ΣDDT, t
Page 310 and 311: DDT metabolites, the ratio of (p,p
Page 312 and 313: 2001). Therefore, the predominance
Page 314 and 315: Mean concentration (ng g -1 dw)3002
Page 316 and 317: CONCLUSIONSAn evaluation of selecte
Page 318 and 319: Hung, D.Q., Thiemann, W., (2002),
Page 320 and 321: Viet, P.H., Hoai, P.M., Minh, N.H.,
Page 322 and 323: found in tissues or fluids samples
Page 324 and 325: Study area and SamplingThis study w
Page 326 and 327: the liver, mainly to p,p'-DDE and p
Page 328 and 329: 33,370 ha, whilst that of woody cro
Page 330 and 331: Increase in crops area (x1000)Ha)25
Page 332 and 333: Table 1. Blood concentrations of or
Page 334 and 335: Council Directive 90/533/EEC of 15
Page 336 and 337: Konstantinou, IK, Goutner, V, Alban
Page 338 and 339: Smith, AG (2004). “Toxicology of
Page 340 and 341: Pesticides are used in order to pro
Page 342 and 343: EXPERIMENTALMaterialsIsoproturon wa
Page 344 and 345: RESULTS AND DISCUSIONEquilibrium is
Page 346 and 347: As seen in Table 4, as the concentr
Page 348 and 349: Fig.4. Breakthrough curves of isopr
Page 350 and 351:
Fig.6. Breakthrough curves of isopr
Page 352 and 353:
Fig.8. Experimental and theoretical
Page 354 and 355:
Section 3PESTICIDE ANALYSISAcademyP
Page 356 and 357:
scandal’ are familiar to the gene
Page 358 and 359:
ecoveries (>70%) for certain pH-dep
Page 360 and 361:
Due the versatility of the QuEChERS
Page 362 and 363:
of application, with some still sca
Page 364 and 365:
The main supercritical solvent used
Page 366 and 367:
extracting the pesticides from the
Page 368 and 369:
would be appropriate for the routin
Page 370 and 371:
chromatography with negative-ion el
Page 372 and 373:
GPC was applied as a nondestructive
Page 374 and 375:
Charlton A.J.A., Stuckey, V. (2009)
Page 376 and 377:
Lehotay, S.J., Mastvoska, K. & Yun,
Page 378 and 379:
Rodrigues, F. M., Mesquita, P. R. R
Page 380 and 381:
Analytical methods to assess the im
Page 382 and 383:
acetylcholine, a neurotransmitter t
Page 384 and 385:
1.3 to 22.3% for all pesticides. Li
Page 386 and 387:
Malathion, parathion, fenitrothion,
Page 388 and 389:
Fuller, BH and Berger, GMB (1990).
Page 390 and 391:
Table 1. Largest exporters of coffe
Page 392 and 393:
Fig. 1: Structures of (a) Phosphate
Page 394 and 395:
ELECTROCHEMICAL BIOSENSORBiosensors
Page 396 and 397:
inorganic and organic species a lar
Page 398 and 399:
surface area and be easily modified
Page 400 and 401:
Acetylcholine + H 2 O AChE Choline
Page 402 and 403:
Wang, 2010) and tetracyanoquinodime
Page 404 and 405:
PDDA/AChE/PDDA/CNT/GCAChE-Au-PPy/GC
Page 406 and 407:
ng/mL and good precision (RSD ) 5.3
Page 408 and 409:
FUTURE PERSPECTIVESThe detection of
Page 410 and 411:
Du, D; Wang, M; Cai, J; Qin, Y; Zha
Page 412 and 413:
Martorell, D; Cespedes, F; Fabreaga
Page 414 and 415:
The Pesticide Action Network (PAN).
Page 416 and 417:
About EditorMilan JokanovićProfess
Page 418:
THE IMPACT OF PESTICIDESPesticides
show all

The Impact of Pesticides - Academy Publish

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?