Rezümékötet 2008. - vmtdk
Rezümékötet 2008. - vmtdk
Rezümékötet 2008. - vmtdk
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
88<br />
É L E T T E L E N T E R M É S Z E T T U D O M Á N Y O K<br />
É S M Û S Z A K I T U D O M Á N Y O K<br />
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE LAW OF<br />
HERITAGE PROTECTION<br />
HUNGARY–SERBIA<br />
Scientific examination of the statute and measure in the Law of Heritage Protection in Hungary and in Serbia<br />
Author: Éva LOVRA final year student<br />
Supervisor: Viktorija ALADŽIÆ Phd, Ildikó MERSITS<br />
Institution: University in Novi Sad, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Urbanism, Subotica<br />
University in Pécs, Pollack Mihály Technical Faculty, Pécs<br />
The topic of the research work is a scientific examination of the Hungarian law, 2001. évi LXIV. törvény a kulturális<br />
örökség védelmérõl, what is already EU-conform and of the Serbian statute, Zakon o kulturnim dobrima „Službeni<br />
glasnik RS” br. 71/94. The point of measure is how these acts could live, how can we observe them and also the qualitative,<br />
stylistic and professional features.<br />
During my studies in Pécs I came across with the practical and theoretical heritage protection use in Hungary<br />
that served as an example of what can be seen as caracteristic in the European Union. The way of thinking, in quality<br />
and in their realisation is quite different from the Serbian. Monitoring the examples in Subotica, I wasn’t able to find<br />
logical reasons and explanation of those issues that I discovered there. For this reason I started to take a look on our<br />
Law; after I learned more about the positive and negative side of the Hungarian examples, next to the judicial background,<br />
I took the mentality, the mental aspect, in the way of common behave of the country also into consideration.<br />
Considering the small sources that i had (used laws and my own toughts) this objective topic has,in some cases, subjective<br />
outputs.. Spontaneously trough the analyse it came into being the comparison of the acts.<br />
In my paper the contrasts, parallels stand out in relief. During the analysis and at the end of the work critical<br />
comments and changeover recommendations are given, both practical and theoretical, with the objective of the improvement<br />
of both laws and the way of thinking inherent to them.<br />
Keywords: heritage protection, Hungary, Serbia<br />
V I I . V A J D A S Á G I M A G Y A R T U D O M Á