Army Emergency Management Program - Federation of American ...
Army Emergency Management Program - Federation of American ...
Army Emergency Management Program - Federation of American ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 2<br />
Concept <strong>of</strong> Employment<br />
2–1. Overview<br />
a. Intent. This publication is focused on coordinating, integrating, developing, preparing, and employing EM<br />
capabilities: (1) to reduce the risk <strong>of</strong> emergencies impacting an <strong>Army</strong> installation through preparedness, mitigation, and<br />
prevention activities and (2) to develop response and recovery capabilities to manage all natural, technological, and<br />
terrorism hazards impacting or with the potential to impact the jurisdiction, supported mission, the protected populace,<br />
or supporting critical and routine infrastructure.<br />
b. Operational environment. As described in chapter 1 and detailed in chapter 4, <strong>Army</strong> installations exist in a broad<br />
spectrum <strong>of</strong> geographic, physical, political, social, information, and hazard environments. This means that any guidance<br />
provided by a higher headquarters level will need to be tailored to the specific operational environment applicable to a<br />
specific installation commander.<br />
c. Hazard environment. As defined by chapter 5, the EM program must address the full range <strong>of</strong> natural, technological,<br />
and terrorism hazards. These hazards and the resulting emergencies that occur when these hazards impact mission,<br />
people, or infrastructure vary dramatically in onset (sudden, gradual, slow), duration (short, medium, long), and impact<br />
(low, medium, high). The resulting emergencies may be broken down into Type 1–5 (incidents).<br />
d. Resilient community. Successful response and recovery operations begin with a resilient <strong>Army</strong> community that is<br />
actively engaged in the Ready <strong>Army</strong> Community Preparedness Campaign. The majority <strong>of</strong> any installation’s available<br />
resources during response operations exist in the individuals, Families, tenants, and businesses that work, live, and<br />
operate on the installation on a daily basis. These residents and tenants decide early on how well response operations<br />
will succeed or fail in meeting the goals <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Army</strong> EM <strong>Program</strong> (see chap 1 for vision, mission, and goal<br />
information). It is these residents that will recognize a hazard, notify the installation dispatch center via 911 (or the<br />
local emergency number), and take the initial protective actions in accordance with their instincts, experience, and<br />
training (Ready <strong>Army</strong>), to include evacuating, sheltering-in-place, treating the wounded, and providing critical information<br />
to first and emergency responders. These residents will take these actions well before the mass warning and<br />
notification system is activated or the first unit is on the scene. Once the mass warning and notification system is<br />
activated, past engagement through the Ready <strong>Army</strong> Community Preparedness Campaign will have helped build the<br />
level <strong>of</strong> trust, knowledge, confidence, and aptitude to follow the protective action recommendations quickly and<br />
effectively. This consistent, positive messaging prior to an emergency extends to building the trust base required for<br />
effective EPI throughout the response and recovery phases.<br />
e. Continuity at all levels. Successful response and recovery operations require continuity at all levels from the<br />
highest levels <strong>of</strong> government (continuity <strong>of</strong> government) to all critical or essential operations (continuity <strong>of</strong> operations<br />
(COOP)) to essential services, headquarters and staff functions, tenant organizations, and commercial businesses<br />
(business continuity). The reason for the installation’s existence is to enable mission execution in support <strong>of</strong> the<br />
national military strategy. The mission essential functions (MEFs) necessary to perform these missions reside in all<br />
manner <strong>of</strong> information, expertise, capabilities, and facilities. It is not operationally or financially possible to sustain all<br />
MEFs all <strong>of</strong> the time in an all-hazards environment. However, it is possible to mitigate the potential effects <strong>of</strong> these<br />
hazards to these MEFs through a comprehensive, integrated continuity program. The same applies to all <strong>of</strong> the<br />
headquarters, staff, and business functions that organize and maintain all <strong>of</strong> the necessary elements <strong>of</strong> operational<br />
readiness and community life on the installation. All <strong>of</strong> these supporting functions make up the “normalcy” that the<br />
installation is striving to achieve during the recovery phase. The sooner these functions are restored to normal<br />
operations, then the sooner the protected populace can return to a semblance <strong>of</strong> normal, daily life after an emergency.<br />
This speed to recovery is enabled first and foremost by an aggressive continuity program at every level.<br />
f. Capability development. In order to execute the concept <strong>of</strong> employment for these EM capabilities, installation<br />
emergency managers and the installation emergency management working group (EMWG) will need to answer the<br />
following questions:<br />
Who is responsible for building and maintain these EM capabilities (see chap 3)?<br />
Who makes up their protected populace (see chap 4)?<br />
What protective strategies apply to each category <strong>of</strong> personnel (see chap 4)?<br />
What hazards apply to their geographic area (see chap 5)?<br />
What are the relative risks <strong>of</strong> these hazards in order to concentrate efforts on the highest overall risks to the<br />
installation’s mission, personnel, and infrastructure (see chap 5)?<br />
How do they plan effectively to decrease overall risk from these hazards (see chap 6)?<br />
How do they develop a resilient community which involves all assigned personnel? (see chap 7)?<br />
How does NIMS implementation, especially resource management, contribute to all phases <strong>of</strong> EM (see chaps 8–9)?<br />
How do they develop and execute continuity programs within an all-hazards context (see chap 10)?<br />
How do they implement command, control, and communications (C3) capabilities in support <strong>of</strong> all emergencies (see<br />
chap 11)?<br />
How do they manage evacuations, conduct SIP operations, and conduct mass care operations in support <strong>of</strong> displaced<br />
DA PAM 525–27 20 September 2012<br />
9