Army Emergency Management Program - Federation of American ...
Army Emergency Management Program - Federation of American ...
Army Emergency Management Program - Federation of American ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Resource management.<br />
Command and management.<br />
Ongoing management and maintenance.<br />
b. Context. NIMS serves as the foundation for every element <strong>of</strong> EM and for the response and recovery to Type 1–5<br />
incidents. NIMS is focused on developing, organizing, and integrating all levels <strong>of</strong> government and all types <strong>of</strong><br />
capabilities during the preparedness, mitigation, and prevention phases while institutionalizing core principles, such as<br />
resource management, Incident Command System (ICS), and Multi-agency Coordination System (MACS), into the<br />
response and recovery operations associated with every incident regardless <strong>of</strong> cause. NIMS will continue to evolve as<br />
the National Preparedness System established by PPD 8 is phased in. The NRF and other national documents are<br />
predominately focused on employing and integrating Federal capabilities in order to manage large-scale Type 1 and<br />
Type 2 incidents (see fig 2–1 for a review <strong>of</strong> incident typing).<br />
c. Intent. The intent <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Army</strong> EM <strong>Program</strong> is to develop comprehensive, integrated EM programs at the<br />
equivalent <strong>of</strong> the local level in order to successfully manage Type 3–5 (Incidents) through the coordinated application<br />
<strong>of</strong> organic and precoordinated external resources. When emergencies expand beyond the capabilities <strong>of</strong> the installation<br />
in coordination with local civil jurisdictions and local DOD installations to manage, then EM programs must have the<br />
processes and procedures necessary to request support from DOD and the supported geographic combatant commander<br />
as well as from State and Federal agencies, but it is not the installation which bears the burden to develop the<br />
capabilities for managing a catastrophic Type 1 (Incident). That mission goes to a large swath <strong>of</strong> Federal and State<br />
agencies and departments and is coordinated through the National Preparedness System and executed through the NRF.<br />
See chapter 18 for an overview <strong>of</strong> the relevant national response policies and procedures.<br />
d. Requirements. All installations at domestic locations (as defined by chap 1) shall adopt NIMS as described in this<br />
publication per HSPD 5 and the Office <strong>of</strong> the Deputy Secretary <strong>of</strong> Defense memorandum, dated 29 November 2005.<br />
All installations at overseas locations shall adopt NIMS to the greatest extent possible. The principles <strong>of</strong> NIMS apply<br />
to all locations worldwide, though the specific language or execution varies from country to country.<br />
Note. The term “consistent with NIMS” does not provide justification for failure to complete training requirements, develop<br />
installation EM plans, or meet the requirements stated in this publication. The term “consistent with NIMS” refers to the facts that<br />
(1) DOD as a whole is primarily a Warfighting force, (2) DOD retains control <strong>of</strong> DOD personnel regardless <strong>of</strong> mission, assignment,<br />
or function, and (3) DOD personnel are never provided under ICS or MACS as an independent resource to a civil jurisdiction, but<br />
rather as a strike team or task force resource under the leadership and authority <strong>of</strong> a DOD representative, whether a uniformed<br />
service member or DOD civilian. In this context, NIMS implementation is focused on the installation environment instead <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Warfighting force as a whole.<br />
8–2. National integration center resources<br />
NIMS is a living document, which is constantly being contributed to by thousands <strong>of</strong> State, tribal, and local<br />
jurisdictions as well as Federal departments, NGO/FBOs, and private sector contributors. National Integration Center<br />
(NIC), Incident <strong>Management</strong> Systems Integration Division (formerly known as the NIMS Integration Center), publishes<br />
the standards, guidelines, and compliance protocols for determining whether a Federal, State, tribal, or local government<br />
has implemented NIMS. DHS, through the NIC, manages publication and working in collaboration with other<br />
departments and agencies, develops standards, guidelines, compliance procedures, and protocols for all aspects <strong>of</strong><br />
NIMS. Questions regarding NIMS should be directed to FEMA–NIMS@dhs.gov or 202–646–3850. The NIMS<br />
Resource Center is available at http://www.fema.gov/emergency/nims/index.shtm.<br />
8–3. Phased implementation process<br />
a. Concept. The NIMS is implemented in a four phase implementation process. Different levels <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Army</strong> are at<br />
different phases at any one time as it is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> DOD to provide overarching guidance and then for HQDA<br />
G–34 to develop and publish guidance and direction for subordinate headquarters, which do the same for their<br />
subordinate installations. The 4 phases are—<br />
NIMS Phase I: Adopt NIMS concepts and principles.<br />
NIMS Phase II: Identify relevant plans, policies, and procedures.<br />
NIMS Phase III: Update relevant plans, policies, and procedures.<br />
NIMS Phase IV: Support NIC standards, to include follow-on training, exercises, and program certification.<br />
b. Training. Only Phase I and Phase IV have associated training requirements. As this process began with the<br />
release <strong>of</strong> NIMS in March 2004, this phased training requirement gave the Federal government time to develop the<br />
Phase IV training curriculum while the State and local agencies were conducting their review and updates to relevant<br />
plans, policies, and procedures (Phase II and III tasks). Although the numerical designations and letter suffixes <strong>of</strong> these<br />
courses evolve over time, these changes do not absolve the commands from the responsibility to meet the training<br />
requirements identified in this publication. If a command is unsure <strong>of</strong> whether a new course number meets the<br />
requirements, then the command should request clarification from DAMO–ODP via the appropriate chain <strong>of</strong> command.<br />
DAMO–ODP will provide additional guidance to align these training requirements with the new “Academy” model<br />
DA PAM 525–27 20 September 2012<br />
47