30.01.2013 Views

Army Emergency Management Program - Federation of American ...

Army Emergency Management Program - Federation of American ...

Army Emergency Management Program - Federation of American ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Resource management.<br />

Command and management.<br />

Ongoing management and maintenance.<br />

b. Context. NIMS serves as the foundation for every element <strong>of</strong> EM and for the response and recovery to Type 1–5<br />

incidents. NIMS is focused on developing, organizing, and integrating all levels <strong>of</strong> government and all types <strong>of</strong><br />

capabilities during the preparedness, mitigation, and prevention phases while institutionalizing core principles, such as<br />

resource management, Incident Command System (ICS), and Multi-agency Coordination System (MACS), into the<br />

response and recovery operations associated with every incident regardless <strong>of</strong> cause. NIMS will continue to evolve as<br />

the National Preparedness System established by PPD 8 is phased in. The NRF and other national documents are<br />

predominately focused on employing and integrating Federal capabilities in order to manage large-scale Type 1 and<br />

Type 2 incidents (see fig 2–1 for a review <strong>of</strong> incident typing).<br />

c. Intent. The intent <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Army</strong> EM <strong>Program</strong> is to develop comprehensive, integrated EM programs at the<br />

equivalent <strong>of</strong> the local level in order to successfully manage Type 3–5 (Incidents) through the coordinated application<br />

<strong>of</strong> organic and precoordinated external resources. When emergencies expand beyond the capabilities <strong>of</strong> the installation<br />

in coordination with local civil jurisdictions and local DOD installations to manage, then EM programs must have the<br />

processes and procedures necessary to request support from DOD and the supported geographic combatant commander<br />

as well as from State and Federal agencies, but it is not the installation which bears the burden to develop the<br />

capabilities for managing a catastrophic Type 1 (Incident). That mission goes to a large swath <strong>of</strong> Federal and State<br />

agencies and departments and is coordinated through the National Preparedness System and executed through the NRF.<br />

See chapter 18 for an overview <strong>of</strong> the relevant national response policies and procedures.<br />

d. Requirements. All installations at domestic locations (as defined by chap 1) shall adopt NIMS as described in this<br />

publication per HSPD 5 and the Office <strong>of</strong> the Deputy Secretary <strong>of</strong> Defense memorandum, dated 29 November 2005.<br />

All installations at overseas locations shall adopt NIMS to the greatest extent possible. The principles <strong>of</strong> NIMS apply<br />

to all locations worldwide, though the specific language or execution varies from country to country.<br />

Note. The term “consistent with NIMS” does not provide justification for failure to complete training requirements, develop<br />

installation EM plans, or meet the requirements stated in this publication. The term “consistent with NIMS” refers to the facts that<br />

(1) DOD as a whole is primarily a Warfighting force, (2) DOD retains control <strong>of</strong> DOD personnel regardless <strong>of</strong> mission, assignment,<br />

or function, and (3) DOD personnel are never provided under ICS or MACS as an independent resource to a civil jurisdiction, but<br />

rather as a strike team or task force resource under the leadership and authority <strong>of</strong> a DOD representative, whether a uniformed<br />

service member or DOD civilian. In this context, NIMS implementation is focused on the installation environment instead <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Warfighting force as a whole.<br />

8–2. National integration center resources<br />

NIMS is a living document, which is constantly being contributed to by thousands <strong>of</strong> State, tribal, and local<br />

jurisdictions as well as Federal departments, NGO/FBOs, and private sector contributors. National Integration Center<br />

(NIC), Incident <strong>Management</strong> Systems Integration Division (formerly known as the NIMS Integration Center), publishes<br />

the standards, guidelines, and compliance protocols for determining whether a Federal, State, tribal, or local government<br />

has implemented NIMS. DHS, through the NIC, manages publication and working in collaboration with other<br />

departments and agencies, develops standards, guidelines, compliance procedures, and protocols for all aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

NIMS. Questions regarding NIMS should be directed to FEMA–NIMS@dhs.gov or 202–646–3850. The NIMS<br />

Resource Center is available at http://www.fema.gov/emergency/nims/index.shtm.<br />

8–3. Phased implementation process<br />

a. Concept. The NIMS is implemented in a four phase implementation process. Different levels <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Army</strong> are at<br />

different phases at any one time as it is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> DOD to provide overarching guidance and then for HQDA<br />

G–34 to develop and publish guidance and direction for subordinate headquarters, which do the same for their<br />

subordinate installations. The 4 phases are—<br />

NIMS Phase I: Adopt NIMS concepts and principles.<br />

NIMS Phase II: Identify relevant plans, policies, and procedures.<br />

NIMS Phase III: Update relevant plans, policies, and procedures.<br />

NIMS Phase IV: Support NIC standards, to include follow-on training, exercises, and program certification.<br />

b. Training. Only Phase I and Phase IV have associated training requirements. As this process began with the<br />

release <strong>of</strong> NIMS in March 2004, this phased training requirement gave the Federal government time to develop the<br />

Phase IV training curriculum while the State and local agencies were conducting their review and updates to relevant<br />

plans, policies, and procedures (Phase II and III tasks). Although the numerical designations and letter suffixes <strong>of</strong> these<br />

courses evolve over time, these changes do not absolve the commands from the responsibility to meet the training<br />

requirements identified in this publication. If a command is unsure <strong>of</strong> whether a new course number meets the<br />

requirements, then the command should request clarification from DAMO–ODP via the appropriate chain <strong>of</strong> command.<br />

DAMO–ODP will provide additional guidance to align these training requirements with the new “Academy” model<br />

DA PAM 525–27 20 September 2012<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!