30.01.2013 Views

Army Emergency Management Program - Federation of American ...

Army Emergency Management Program - Federation of American ...

Army Emergency Management Program - Federation of American ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

catastrophic Type I Incident embodied by such examples as Hurricane Katrina in 2005, the Indonesian Tsunami <strong>of</strong><br />

2004, the Bam (Iran) Earthquake <strong>of</strong> 2003, and the terrorist attacks <strong>of</strong> September 11, 2001 instead <strong>of</strong> the vast majority<br />

<strong>of</strong> incidents, which are well within the capabilities and capacity <strong>of</strong> local jurisdictions with the occasional resource<br />

support from State, regional, and national agencies.<br />

(2) Relationship to National Policy. The Department <strong>of</strong> Homeland Security (DHS) target capability list (TCL)<br />

assumes that all required State and local capabilities already exist prior to establishing the need for additional<br />

capabilities and capacity focused on Type 1 and Type 2 incidents. It is these underlying local capabilities which this<br />

publication mandates. Looking solely to the TCL and similar aspects <strong>of</strong> national policy, including NRF and PPD 8, as<br />

a guide for local capability development is fundamentally flawed and results in weak or missing foundational<br />

capabilities and capacity at the local level.<br />

Figure 2–1. Incident types<br />

b. Hazard onset. Chapter 5 provides specific guidance on identification and the risk management process in the allhazards<br />

environment. The concept <strong>of</strong> employment for the EM program considers all hazards in relation to their speed<br />

<strong>of</strong> onset, scale, and potential impact when developing capabilities. The speed <strong>of</strong> onset provides the greatest differentiation<br />

in the time-phased employment <strong>of</strong> capability within the EM program.<br />

(1) Sudden onset. Sudden onset hazards occur with little to no actionable warning or prior information (for example,<br />

earthquakes or acts <strong>of</strong> terrorism). Increasing the warning period pre-incident has dramatic results in terms <strong>of</strong> sustaining<br />

mission capabilities, saving lives, and protecting infrastructure. Integration with existing warning systems and processes<br />

available in the local civil jurisdictions yields a great return on investment.<br />

(2) Gradual onset. Gradual onset hazards may provide actionable warning (for example, tropical cyclones) or<br />

multiple low threshold warning incidents that may be missed without a process to monitor, evaluate, and report on the<br />

applicable issues (for example, syndromic surveillance for disease outbreaks, coastal beach erosion, or environmental<br />

pollution).<br />

(3) Delayed onset. Delayed onset hazards have delayed impacts from the time <strong>of</strong> the actual initiating event, such as<br />

onset <strong>of</strong> symptoms resulting from exposure to biological hazards. Delayed onset hazards may be accompanied by<br />

actionable warning (for example, pandemic influenza) or multiple low threshold warning incidents that may be missed<br />

without a process to monitor, evaluate, and report on the applicable issues (for example, syndromic surveillance).<br />

2–4. Installation type designations<br />

a. Process. This function is performed by the installation-owning commands (IMCOM, AMC, USARC, ARNG) in<br />

coordination with DAMO–ODP and with information provided by the installation commanders. Installation typing is<br />

based upon the EM capabilities that the installation is capable <strong>of</strong> attaining and maintaining through a combination <strong>of</strong><br />

organic and/or external resources. Per DODI 6055.17, AR 525–27, improvement plan (IP) study report, and based upon<br />

previous efforts in DODI 3020.52, this instruction shall continue the DOD use <strong>of</strong> a Type C I, II, and I system aligned<br />

with the capability standards identified in applicable references, to include 29 CFR 1910.120Q and National Fire<br />

DA PAM 525–27 20 September 2012<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!