05.04.2013 Views

Smith's Bible Dictionary.pdf - Online Christian Library

Smith's Bible Dictionary.pdf - Online Christian Library

Smith's Bible Dictionary.pdf - Online Christian Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Smith's</strong> <strong>Bible</strong> <strong>Dictionary</strong><br />

wanderings in the wilderness, B.C. 1491-1451. Time .—The book of Genesis covered 2369<br />

years,—from the creation of Adam, A.M 1, to the death of Joseph, A.M. 2369, or B.C. 1635.<br />

Character and purpose .—The book of Genesis (with the first chapters of Exodus) describes the<br />

steps which led to the establishment of the theocracy. It is a part of the writer’s plan to tell us what<br />

the divine preparation of the world was in order to show, first, the significance of the call of<br />

Abraham, and next, the true nature of the Jewish theocracy. He begins with the creation of the<br />

world, because the God who created the world and the God who revealed himself to the fathers is<br />

the same God. The book of Genesis has thus a character at once special and universal. Construction<br />

.—It is clear that Moses must have derived his knowledge of the events which he records in Genesis<br />

either from immediate divine revelation or from oral tradition or written documents. The nature of<br />

many of the facts related, and the minuteness of the narration, render it extremely improbable that<br />

immediate revelation was the source from whence they were drawn. That his knowledge should<br />

have been derived from oral tradition appears morally impossible when we consider the great<br />

number of names, ages, dates and minute events which are recorded. The conclusion then, seems<br />

fair that he must have obtained his information from written documents coeval, or nearly so, with<br />

the events which they recorded, and composed by persons intimately acquainted with the subjects<br />

to which they relate. He may have collected these, with additions from authentic tradition or existing<br />

monuments under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, into a single book. Certain it is that several of<br />

the first chapters of Genesis have the air of being made up of selections from very ancient documents,<br />

written by different authors at different periods. The variety which is observable in the names and<br />

titles of the Supreme Being is appealed to among the most striking proofs of this fact. This is obvious<br />

in the English translation, but still more so in the Hebrew original. In Gen 1 to 2:3, which is really<br />

one piece of composition, as the title, v. 4, “These are the generations,” shows, the name of the<br />

Most High is uniformly Elohim, God. In ch. (Genesis 2:4) to ch. 3, which may be considered the<br />

second document, the title is uniformly Yehovah Elohim, Lord God ; and in the third, including<br />

ch. 4, it is Yehovah, Lord, only; while in ch. 5 it is Elohim, God only, except in v. 29, where a<br />

quotation is made, and Yehovah used. It is hardly conceivable that all this should be the result of<br />

mere accident. The changes of the name correspond exactly to the changes in the narratives and<br />

the titles of the several pieces.” Now, do all these accurate quotations,” says Professor Stowe,<br />

“impair the credit of the Mosaic books, or increase it? Is Marshall’s Life of Washington to be<br />

regarded as unworthy of credit because it contains copious extracts from Washington’s<br />

correspondence and literal quotations from important public documents? Is not its value greatly<br />

enhanced by this circumstance? The objection is altogether futile. In the common editions of the<br />

<strong>Bible</strong> the Pentateuch occupies about one hundred and fifty pages, of which perhaps ten may be<br />

taken up with quotations. This surely is no very large proportion for an historical work extending<br />

through so long a period.”—Bush. On the supposition that writing was known to Adam, Gen. 1-4,<br />

containing the first two of these documents, formed the <strong>Bible</strong> of Adam’s descendants, or the<br />

antediluvians. Gen 1 to 11:9, being the sum of these two and the following three, constitutes the<br />

<strong>Bible</strong> of the descendants of Noah. The whole of Genesis may be called the <strong>Bible</strong> of the posterity<br />

of Jacob; and the five Books of the Law were the first <strong>Bible</strong> of Israel as a nation.—Canon Cook.<br />

Gennesaret<br />

(garden of the prince), Land of. It is generally believed that this term was applied to the fertile<br />

crescent-shaped plain on the western shore of the lake, extending from Khan Minyeh (two or three<br />

miles south of Capernaum (Tel-Hum) on the north to the steep hill behind Mejdel (Magdala) on<br />

231<br />

William Smith

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!