05.04.2013 Views

Smith's Bible Dictionary.pdf - Online Christian Library

Smith's Bible Dictionary.pdf - Online Christian Library

Smith's Bible Dictionary.pdf - Online Christian Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Smith's</strong> <strong>Bible</strong> <strong>Dictionary</strong><br />

objectionable in the condition of Hebrew servants. In respect to marriage there were some<br />

peculiarities which, to our ideas, would be regarded as hardships. A master might, for instance,<br />

give a wife to a Hebrew servant for the time of his servitude, the wife being in this case, it must<br />

be remarked, not only a slave but a non-Hebrew. Should he leave when his term had expired, his<br />

wife and children would remain the absolute property of the master. (Exodus 21:4,5) Again, a<br />

father might sell his young daughter to a Hebrew, with a view either of marrying her himself or<br />

of giving her to his son. (Exodus 21:7-9) It diminishes the apparent harshness of this proceeding<br />

if we look on the purchase money as in the light of a dowry given, as was not unusual, to the<br />

parents of the bride; still more, if we accept the rabbinical view that the consent of the maid was<br />

required before the marriage could take place. The position of a maiden thus sold by her father<br />

was subject to the following regulations: (1) She could not “go out as the men-servants do,” i.e.<br />

she could not leave at the termination of six years, or in the year of jubilee, if her master was<br />

willing to fulfill the object for which he had purchased her. (2) Should he not wish to marry her,<br />

he should call upon her friends to procure her release by the repayment of the purchase money.<br />

(3) If he betrothed her to his son, he was bound to make such provision for her as he would for<br />

one of his own daughters. (4) If either he or his son, having married her, took a second wife, it<br />

should not be to the prejudice of the first. (5) If neither of the three first specified alternatives took<br />

place, the maid was entitled to immediate and gratuitous liberty. (Exodus 21:7-11) The custom of<br />

reducing Hebrews to servitude appears to have fallen into disuse subsequent to the Babylonish<br />

captivity. Vast numbers of Hebrews were reduced to slavery as war-captives at different periods<br />

by the Phoenicians, (Joel 3:6) the Philistines, (Joel 3:6; Amos 1:6), the Syrians, 1 Macc. 3:42; 2<br />

Macc. 8:11, the Egyptians, Joseph Ant. xii. 2,3, and above all by the Romans. Joseph. B.C. vi.<br />

9,3. II. Non-Hebrew slaves.—<br />

•The majority of non-Hebrew slaves were war-captives, either of the Canaanites who had survived<br />

the general extermination of their race under Joshua or such as were conquered from the other<br />

surrounding nations. (Numbers 31:26) ff. Besides these, many were obtained by purchase from<br />

foreign slave-dealers, (Leviticus 25:44,45) and others may have been resident foreigners who were<br />

reduced to this state by either poverty or crime. The children of slaves remained slaves, being the<br />

class described as “born in the house,” (Genesis 14:14; 17:12; Ecclesiastes 2:7) and hence the<br />

number was likely to increase as time went on. The average value of a slave appears to have been<br />

thirty shekels. (Exodus 21:32)<br />

•That the slave might be manumitted appears from (Exodus 21:26,27; Leviticus 19:20)<br />

•The slave is described as the “possession” of his master, apparently with a special reference to the<br />

power which the latter had of disposing of him to his heirs, as he would any other article of personal<br />

property. (Leviticus 25:45,46) But, on the other hand, provision was made for the protection of<br />

his person. (Exodus 21:20; Leviticus 24:17,22) A minor personal injury, such as the loss of an<br />

eye or a tooth, was to be recompensed by giving the servant his liberty. (Exodus 21:26,27) The<br />

position of the slave in regard to religious privileges was favorable. He was to be circumcised,<br />

(Genesis 17:12) and hence was entitled to partake of the paschal sacrifice, (Exodus 12:44) as well<br />

as of the other religious festivals. (12:12,18; 16:11,14) The occupations of slaves were of a menial<br />

character, as implied in (Leviticus 25:39) consisting partly in the work of the house and partly in<br />

personal attendance on the master. It will be seen that the whole tendency of the <strong>Bible</strong> legislation<br />

was to mitigate slavery, making it little than hired service, and to abolish it, as indeed it was<br />

practically abolished among the Jews six hundred years before Christ.<br />

700<br />

William Smith

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!