05.04.2013 Views

Smith's Bible Dictionary.pdf - Online Christian Library

Smith's Bible Dictionary.pdf - Online Christian Library

Smith's Bible Dictionary.pdf - Online Christian Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Smith's</strong> <strong>Bible</strong> <strong>Dictionary</strong><br />

The popular name in this, as in so many instances,is not that of Scripture. There we have the<br />

“TEN WORDS,” (Exodus 34:28; 4:13; 10:4) the ”Covenant,” Ex., Deut. 11. cc.; (1 Kings 8:21; 2<br />

Chronicles 6:11) etc., or, very often as the solemn attestation of the divine will, the “TESTIMONY.”<br />

(Exodus 25:16,21; 31:18) etc. The circumstances in which the Ten great Words were first given to<br />

the people surrounded them with an awe which attached to no other precept. In the midst of the<br />

cloud and the darkness and the flashing lightning and the fiery smoke and the thunder like the voice<br />

of a trumpet, Moses was called to Mount Sinai to receive the law without which the people would<br />

cease to be a holy nation. (Exodus 19:20) Here, as elsewhere, Scripture unites two facts which men<br />

separate. God, and not man was speaking to the Israelites in those terrors, and yet, in the language<br />

of later inspired teachers, other instrumentality was not excluded. No other words were proclaimed<br />

in like manner. And the record was as exceptional as the original revelation. Of no other words<br />

could it be said that they were written as these were written, engraved on the Tables of Stone, not<br />

as originating in man’s contrivance or sagacity, but by the power of the Eternal Spirit, by the “finger<br />

of God.” (Exodus 31:18; 32:16) The number Ten was, we can hardly doubt, itself significant to<br />

Moses and the Israelites. The received symbol, then and at all times, of completeness, it taught the<br />

people that the law of Jehovah was perfect. (Psalms 19:7) The term “Commandments” had come<br />

into use in the time of Christ. (Luke 18:20) Their division into two tables is not only expressly<br />

mentioned but the stress is upon the two leaves no doubt that the distinction was important, and<br />

that answered to that summary of the law which was made both by Moses and by Christ into two<br />

precepts; so that the first table contained Duties to God, and the second, Duties to our Neighbor .<br />

There are three principal divisions of the two tables:<br />

•That of the Roman Catholic Church, making the first table contain three commandments and the<br />

second the other seven.<br />

•The familiar division, referring the first four to our duty toward God and the six remaining to our<br />

duty toward man.<br />

•The division recognized by the old Jewish writers, Josephus and Philo, which places five<br />

commandments in each table. It has been maintained that the law of filial duty, being a close<br />

consequence of God’s fatherly relation to us, maybe referred to the first table. But this is to place<br />

human parents on a level with God, and, by purity of reasoning the Sixth Commandment might<br />

be added to the first table, as murder is the destruction of God’s image in man. Far more reasonable<br />

is the view which regards the authority of parents as heading the second table, as the earthly reflex<br />

of that authority of the Father of his people and of all men which heads the first, and as the first<br />

principle of the whole law of love to our neighbor; because we are all brethren and the family is,<br />

for good and ill the model of the state. “The Decalogue differs from all the other legislation of<br />

Moses: (1) It was proclaimed by God himself in a most public and solemn manner. (2) It was<br />

given under circumstances of most appalling majesty and sublimity. (3) It was written by the finger<br />

of God on two tables of stone. (5:22) (4) It differed from any and all other laws given to Israel in<br />

that it was comprehensive and general rather than specific and particular. (6) It was complete,<br />

being one finished whole to which nothing was to be added, from which nothing was ever taken<br />

away. (6) The law of the Ten Commandments was honored by Jesus Christ as embodying the<br />

substance of the law of God enjoined upon man. (7) It can scarcely be doubted that Jesus had his<br />

eye specially if not exclusively on this law, (5:18) as one never to be repealed from which not one<br />

jot or tittle should ever pass away. (8) It is marked by wonderful simplicity and brevity such a<br />

743<br />

William Smith

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!