Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association
Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association
Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
7-9 October 2009, Leuven, Belgium<br />
IV.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Fig.10. Commutation simulation (dotted) vs. measurement across MOSFET<br />
at 150°C<br />
Although the two figures look identical there is a subtle<br />
difference between them, this difference is illustrated on<br />
“Fig.11.” a Comparison between measurement at 25°C and<br />
150°C are shown, using the drain to source voltage at the end<br />
of the MOSFET commutation.<br />
In this paper, an electrical model using VHDL-AMS code of a<br />
power vertical MOSFET sensitive to temperature has been<br />
shown. The modeling approach and the thermal sensitivity of<br />
MOSFET parameters have been discussed. This model is<br />
simple one, the equation used to model the electrical and the<br />
thermal issues are easy to code with any simulator, the non<br />
linear capacitor equation used is more accurate and rapid than<br />
the conventional one used with other models. Finally this<br />
model will be used as a unit for a distributed electro-thermal<br />
simulation, and each unit will give us the image of the local<br />
temperature of the modeled device, which will give us an idea<br />
for the current distribution in the ship and hotspots. Validation<br />
of the model accuracy has been shown. So this work is the first<br />
step to electro-thermal simulation of power device by simulator<br />
coupling.<br />
Fig.11. Drain to source voltage measurement across MOSFET at 25°C and<br />
150°C (dotted)(zoom on oscillations)<br />
The only significant difference between simulation and<br />
measurement is on the final phase “Fig.12.” it’s clear that the<br />
measurement oscillations are more rapidly damped, this is due<br />
to the skin effect.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] JB.Sauveplane et al., “Smart 3-D Finite-Element Modeling for the<br />
Design of Ultra-Low On-Resistance MOSFET”, IEEE Transactions<br />
on Advanced Packaging, Nov. 2007, V30-4,pp 789-794.<br />
[2] JB.Sauveplane et al., “3D electro-thermal investigations for<br />
reliability of ultra low ON state resistance power MOSFET”,<br />
Microelectronics Reliability, V48 - 8-9, Sep. 2008, pp 1464-1467<br />
[3] S.Wünche, “Simulator Coupling for Electro-Thermal Simulation Of<br />
Integrated Circuits”, Therminic’96, 1996, pp 89-93.<br />
[4] F.Morancho, “Modling and performance of vertical trench<br />
MOSFET in power electronics”, Semiconductor Conference, 1995.<br />
CAS'95 Proceedings.<br />
[5] C.Batard ;T.MEYNARD ;H.FOCH ;J.L.MASSOL<br />
“Circuit oriented simulation of power semiconductor using<br />
success.Application, to diodes and bipolar transistors”. EPE’91,<br />
Florence.<br />
[6] David Divins, “Using Simulation to Estimate MOSFET Junction<br />
Temperature in a Circuit Application”. International Rectifier,<br />
October 2007.<br />
Fig.12. Drain to source voltage across MOSFET at 150°C (zoom on<br />
oscillations)<br />
The skin effect causes the effective resistance of the conductor<br />
to increase with the frequency of the current. We used between<br />
35 to 40 cm of a copper conductor cable for the connections<br />
between the circuit elements, that’s mean there is enough cable<br />
length in our circuit that the effective resistance change in the<br />
cables affect the hall circuit performance. The oscillations<br />
frequency is high (more than 1 MHz), so it’s normal that the<br />
resistor increase, and the measured oscillations are damped<br />
than the simulation due to this effective resistor, which had not<br />
been taken into consideration in the simulation circuit .<br />
©<strong>EDA</strong> <strong>Publishing</strong>/THERMINIC 2009 90<br />
ISBN: 978-2-35500-010-2