Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association
Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association
Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
7-9 October 2009, Leuven, Belgium<br />
of 7 to 10 % has been found [24-26] .<br />
found using the experimental specific heat for nat Si [30]. Due<br />
to the lack of experimental specific heat data for single<br />
It is well known that the fluctuation in the mass silicon isotopes, the quantum corrected temperature is also<br />
distribution throughout a crystal produces thermal resistance obtained using the analytical expression for specific heat<br />
[27-29]. Klemens [29] and Carruthers [28] have suggested (both results are presented in Table I), given by [31]<br />
two similar expressions for the relaxation times associated to cv, a ( T ) =<br />
isotope scattering,<br />
∑ cv,<br />
a ( T,<br />
ωm<br />
)<br />
(7a)<br />
m<br />
−1<br />
4<br />
−1<br />
A 4<br />
τ imp = Aω and τ imp = ω<br />
(4)<br />
⎪⎧<br />
⎪⎫<br />
3<br />
2 exp( hωm<br />
/ kBT<br />
)<br />
v<br />
c ( )<br />
g<br />
v,<br />
a T = ∑ ⎨kB<br />
( h ωm<br />
/ kBT<br />
)<br />
⎬ (7b)<br />
2<br />
m<br />
⎪⎩<br />
[ exp( hωm<br />
/ kBT<br />
) −1]<br />
⎪ ⎭<br />
where, v g is the phonon group velocity and A is a fitted<br />
constant.<br />
where cv, a<br />
( T,<br />
ωm<br />
) is the mode contribution to the specific<br />
Thermal conductivity (W/m-K)<br />
400<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
Δk e<br />
= 16.8 %<br />
100<br />
200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300<br />
Temperature (K)<br />
nat Si - Ho et al. 1974<br />
nat Si - Capinski et al. 1997<br />
nat Si - Kremer et al. 2004<br />
28 Si - Capinski et al. 1997<br />
28 Si - Ruf et al. 2000<br />
28 Si - Gusev et al. 2002<br />
28 Si - Kremer et al. 2004 (Sample NN)<br />
Fig. 1 - Experimental values of thermal conductivity of natural and isotopeenriched<br />
silicon. Δ ke<br />
represents the reduction of the thermal conductivity<br />
due to isotope scattering measured in [25].<br />
III. METHODOLOGY<br />
To obtain the quantum corrected temperature, we modify<br />
the approach described in [14] to include the quantization of<br />
the energy per mode basis and the change of the dispersion<br />
relations. In [14], the thermal conductivity correction factor<br />
is written as,<br />
dT c T<br />
MD v,<br />
e(<br />
)<br />
= (5)<br />
dT 3( N −1)<br />
kB<br />
/ V<br />
where, dT MD / dT is now defined as the ratio between the<br />
experimental ( c v , e ) and the classical specific heats, N is the<br />
number of atoms in the simulation, k B is the Boltzmann<br />
constant. The relation between the molecular dynamics and<br />
corrected temperatures can be found integrating Eq. 5 with<br />
respect to temperature,<br />
V T<br />
*<br />
TMD ( T ) = cv, e(<br />
T ) dT + T<br />
3( N −1)<br />
k ∫<br />
(6)<br />
0<br />
B<br />
In this expression the integration constant * T is of the<br />
order of the Debye temperature [14]. The zero-point energy<br />
term is implicitly included since we are using the<br />
experimental specific heat. The corrected temperature (T ) is<br />
heat. In Eq. 7b, the summation is taken over all phonon<br />
modes in [100] and is computed using the dispersion relation<br />
previously determined using MD [11] at different<br />
temperatures, which include the effects of anharmonicity (i.e.<br />
thermal expansion and change of the dispersion relations).<br />
In addition, due to the difference between the experimental<br />
[12] and analytical dispersion relations at room temperature,<br />
it is expected that the experimental Debye temperature ( θ D )<br />
will be different from the one calculated using pair<br />
potentials, such as, Stillinger-Weber, Tersoff, EDIP, etc.<br />
Therefore, the integration constant in Eq. (6) is adjusted to<br />
include this difference, such that<br />
⎛<br />
max<br />
⎞<br />
* θ ⎜<br />
ω<br />
D<br />
a,<br />
k<br />
T =<br />
⎟<br />
∑<br />
(8)<br />
⎜ max<br />
6 ⎟<br />
k = 1,6 ⎝ ω e , k ⎠<br />
max max<br />
where, ω a,k and ω e,k are the maximum frequencies of the<br />
analytical and experimental dispersion relations for each<br />
branch. Based on our previous results obtained using the<br />
Stillinger-Weber potential [11], we found that the integration<br />
constant is T * =790.94 K. Eq. 8 would converge to the<br />
experimental Debye temperature if both dispersion relations<br />
(experimental and analytical) are equal.<br />
To obtain the correction for the thermal conductivity and<br />
specific heat, Eq. 3 is adjusted to include the quantization of<br />
the energy of each mode at T . In addition, the analytic<br />
specific heat is obtained using the dispersion relations<br />
determined using MD at the studied temperatures. The<br />
thermal conductivity is corrected considering that the<br />
specific heat depends on: i) the temperature, ii) the frequency<br />
(ω ) and iii) the ratio between the total experimental and<br />
analytical specific heats ( c T ) / c ( ) ), as<br />
k(<br />
T)<br />
c<br />
⎧<br />
( T)<br />
⎪4π<br />
⎨<br />
( T)<br />
⎪ 3<br />
⎩<br />
v , e ( v,<br />
a T<br />
= v , e<br />
∑ ∫<br />
c<br />
v,<br />
a<br />
In the equation, v g and p<br />
⎡ωm,max<br />
⎤⎫<br />
1 ⎛<br />
⎞<br />
⎢ ⎜<br />
vg<br />
⎟ ⎥⎪ a<br />
r ⎬<br />
( ) ⎢ ⎜<br />
v<br />
2<br />
c , ( T,<br />
ω)<br />
τ ω dω<br />
3<br />
2<br />
2π<br />
v ⎟ ⎥<br />
⎪ ⎭<br />
b,<br />
p ⎢⎣<br />
ωm,min<br />
⎝<br />
p ⎠ ⎥⎦<br />
… (9)<br />
v are the phonon group and phase<br />
velocities and τ r is the phonon relaxation time. The<br />
expression between curly brackets corresponds to the<br />
Tiwari’s thermal conductivity expression [32]. For<br />
simplicity, we assume that the thermal properties of the<br />
©<strong>EDA</strong> <strong>Publishing</strong>/THERMINIC 2009 199<br />
ISBN: 978-2-35500-010-2