Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association
Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association
Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
7-9 October 2009, Leuven, Belgium<br />
Spatial and temporal temperature variations in CMOS<br />
designs<br />
J.H.J.Janssen<br />
NXP Semiconductors<br />
Gerstweg 2, 6534AE Nijmegen The Netherlands<br />
H.J.M.Veendrick<br />
NXP Semiconductors<br />
HTC-32, 5656AE Eindhoven The Netherlands<br />
Abstract<br />
Due to the rapid growth in the number of transistors per<br />
chip, the power consumption of the average nMOS ASIC<br />
reached the level of one Watt, which is, in order of magnitude,<br />
about the maximum power consumption allowed for a cheap<br />
plastic package without thermal enhancements like drop-in<br />
heat spreader, fused leads or exposed pads. The internal chip<br />
temperature is the result of the combination of the chip power,<br />
the package, a possible heatsink, the application board and the<br />
airflow conditions. This requires a reasonably accurate model<br />
that includes the thermal properties of the chip, the bonds, the<br />
package and the system.<br />
I. INTRODUCTION<br />
The average power consumption of integrated circuits has<br />
been steadily increasing since they have been introduced<br />
about five decades ago. Until the early eighties, nMOS<br />
technology was the most dominant VLSI technology. Logic<br />
gates, then, were built from an nMOS transistor pull-down<br />
circuit representing the logic function in combination with a<br />
single nMOS load transistor, keeping the output high, when<br />
the pull-down circuit was off. This logic had a major<br />
disadvantage in that every logic gate whose output was zero,<br />
meaning that the pull-down circuit was on, consumed static<br />
power as long as this logic zero state was maintained. On the<br />
average this means that half the number of logic gates was<br />
continuously consuming static power, which was about an<br />
order of magnitude more than the switching power. Due to<br />
the rapid growth in the number of transistors per chip, the<br />
power consumption of the average nMOS ASIC reached the<br />
level of one Watt, which is, in order of magnitude, about the<br />
maximum power consumption allowed for a cheap plastic<br />
package without thermal enhancements like drop-in heat<br />
spreader, fused leads or exposed pads. This forced the drive<br />
from nMOS to CMOS technology and circuits in the early<br />
80ies. Due to the absence of simultaneous conduction of the<br />
nMOS and pMOS transistors in a CMOS logic gate, these<br />
did not show any static power consumption. Therefore, an<br />
average CMOS chip, at that time, consumed about a factor<br />
of ten to twenty less than its nMOS counterpart. However,<br />
today, about 25 years later, the average CMOS chip has<br />
reached this package-limited power level of one Watt again,<br />
but with no alternative technology solution. As a result, a<br />
“less power” attitude is a must at all hierarchy levels of<br />
design. Even when that is the case, the average power<br />
consumption of an integrated circuit is still expected to<br />
continuously increase.<br />
Variability is another point of concern. Spatial variations<br />
are variations due to the fact that identical devices have a<br />
different physical position and environment. This variations<br />
may cause a different behaviour of identical transistors due<br />
to a variation in the channel doping level, a different<br />
orientation, a temperature gradient across the chip, a<br />
different metal coverage or other proximity effects, such as<br />
mechanical stress (e.g., STI stress), the position of a well in<br />
the vicinity of a transistor (well-proximity effect), and/or<br />
pattern shape deviations as a result of imperfect lithographic<br />
imaging and pattern density variations.<br />
Time-based variations include signal integrity effects,<br />
such as cross talk, supply noise, ground bounce, and iR-drop,<br />
but also temperature variations over time, due to variations<br />
in workload.<br />
From the above we see that the temperature contributes to<br />
both spatial and time-based variations. This combined with<br />
the increasing power consumption leads to the idea that the<br />
momentary temperature gradient across the chip can vary a<br />
lot with the workload. This may cause circuits in certain<br />
regions on the chip to slow down at a different rate then<br />
others, which will certainly make the performance of a<br />
digital circuit less predictable, and the timing closure more<br />
complex.<br />
In addition to this, steep and large temperature gradients<br />
(hot spots) may also cause physical stress or may cause the<br />
local temperature to exceed the maximum specified<br />
temperature.<br />
To really visualise the overall impact of the power<br />
distribution across a chip, we first need to make the<br />
transition from power distribution to temperature distribution<br />
and then discuss the influence of the temperature on the<br />
speed of the circuit. Temperature distributions are simulated<br />
©<strong>EDA</strong> <strong>Publishing</strong>/THERMINIC 2009 31<br />
ISBN: 978-2-35500-010-2