27.01.2015 Views

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7-9 October 2009, Leuven, Belgium<br />

Spatial and temporal temperature variations in CMOS<br />

designs<br />

J.H.J.Janssen<br />

NXP Semiconductors<br />

Gerstweg 2, 6534AE Nijmegen The Netherlands<br />

H.J.M.Veendrick<br />

NXP Semiconductors<br />

HTC-32, 5656AE Eindhoven The Netherlands<br />

Abstract<br />

Due to the rapid growth in the number of transistors per<br />

chip, the power consumption of the average nMOS ASIC<br />

reached the level of one Watt, which is, in order of magnitude,<br />

about the maximum power consumption allowed for a cheap<br />

plastic package without thermal enhancements like drop-in<br />

heat spreader, fused leads or exposed pads. The internal chip<br />

temperature is the result of the combination of the chip power,<br />

the package, a possible heatsink, the application board and the<br />

airflow conditions. This requires a reasonably accurate model<br />

that includes the thermal properties of the chip, the bonds, the<br />

package and the system.<br />

I. INTRODUCTION<br />

The average power consumption of integrated circuits has<br />

been steadily increasing since they have been introduced<br />

about five decades ago. Until the early eighties, nMOS<br />

technology was the most dominant VLSI technology. Logic<br />

gates, then, were built from an nMOS transistor pull-down<br />

circuit representing the logic function in combination with a<br />

single nMOS load transistor, keeping the output high, when<br />

the pull-down circuit was off. This logic had a major<br />

disadvantage in that every logic gate whose output was zero,<br />

meaning that the pull-down circuit was on, consumed static<br />

power as long as this logic zero state was maintained. On the<br />

average this means that half the number of logic gates was<br />

continuously consuming static power, which was about an<br />

order of magnitude more than the switching power. Due to<br />

the rapid growth in the number of transistors per chip, the<br />

power consumption of the average nMOS ASIC reached the<br />

level of one Watt, which is, in order of magnitude, about the<br />

maximum power consumption allowed for a cheap plastic<br />

package without thermal enhancements like drop-in heat<br />

spreader, fused leads or exposed pads. This forced the drive<br />

from nMOS to CMOS technology and circuits in the early<br />

80ies. Due to the absence of simultaneous conduction of the<br />

nMOS and pMOS transistors in a CMOS logic gate, these<br />

did not show any static power consumption. Therefore, an<br />

average CMOS chip, at that time, consumed about a factor<br />

of ten to twenty less than its nMOS counterpart. However,<br />

today, about 25 years later, the average CMOS chip has<br />

reached this package-limited power level of one Watt again,<br />

but with no alternative technology solution. As a result, a<br />

“less power” attitude is a must at all hierarchy levels of<br />

design. Even when that is the case, the average power<br />

consumption of an integrated circuit is still expected to<br />

continuously increase.<br />

Variability is another point of concern. Spatial variations<br />

are variations due to the fact that identical devices have a<br />

different physical position and environment. This variations<br />

may cause a different behaviour of identical transistors due<br />

to a variation in the channel doping level, a different<br />

orientation, a temperature gradient across the chip, a<br />

different metal coverage or other proximity effects, such as<br />

mechanical stress (e.g., STI stress), the position of a well in<br />

the vicinity of a transistor (well-proximity effect), and/or<br />

pattern shape deviations as a result of imperfect lithographic<br />

imaging and pattern density variations.<br />

Time-based variations include signal integrity effects,<br />

such as cross talk, supply noise, ground bounce, and iR-drop,<br />

but also temperature variations over time, due to variations<br />

in workload.<br />

From the above we see that the temperature contributes to<br />

both spatial and time-based variations. This combined with<br />

the increasing power consumption leads to the idea that the<br />

momentary temperature gradient across the chip can vary a<br />

lot with the workload. This may cause circuits in certain<br />

regions on the chip to slow down at a different rate then<br />

others, which will certainly make the performance of a<br />

digital circuit less predictable, and the timing closure more<br />

complex.<br />

In addition to this, steep and large temperature gradients<br />

(hot spots) may also cause physical stress or may cause the<br />

local temperature to exceed the maximum specified<br />

temperature.<br />

To really visualise the overall impact of the power<br />

distribution across a chip, we first need to make the<br />

transition from power distribution to temperature distribution<br />

and then discuss the influence of the temperature on the<br />

speed of the circuit. Temperature distributions are simulated<br />

©<strong>EDA</strong> <strong>Publishing</strong>/THERMINIC 2009 31<br />

ISBN: 978-2-35500-010-2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!