Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association
Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association
Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
7-9 October 2009, Leuven, Belgium<br />
Electro-Thermal Modeling of Nano-Scale Devices<br />
D. Vasileska 1 , K. Raleva 2 and S. M. Goodnick 1<br />
1 Department of Electrical Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-5706, USA<br />
2 Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, University Sts. Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, Republic of<br />
Macedonia<br />
Abstract-In this paper we present simulation results obtained with<br />
our electro-thermal device simulator when modeling different<br />
technology generations of FD-SOI devices. In particular, we stress<br />
out the importance of the temperature boundary conditions for<br />
digital and analog circuits and the use of the full model which<br />
takes into account both temperature and thickness dependence<br />
(which is particularly important for thin silicon films) of the<br />
thermal conductivity.<br />
Key-words: electro-thermal modeling, FDSOI devices,<br />
particle-based device simulations<br />
I. INTRODUCTION<br />
The scaling of semiconductor devices into the nanometer<br />
regime and the problems associated with further<br />
miniaturization of device technologies has resulted into<br />
investigation of devices with alternative materials and<br />
alternative device designs such as fully-depleted (FD), dualgate<br />
(DG), tri-gate silicon-on-insulator (SOI) and other device<br />
designs. The problem with SOI devices is that they exhibit selfheating<br />
effects. These self-heating effects arise from the fact<br />
that the underlying SiO 2 layer has about 100 times smaller<br />
thermal conductivity than bulk Si (1.4 W/m/K). Also, the<br />
thickness of the silicon film in nanoscale devices is much<br />
smaller than the phonon mean free path which is on the order<br />
of 300 nm in bulk silicon. Therefore, boundary scattering<br />
becomes dominant scattering mechanism, thus reducing the<br />
thermal conductivity value to a fraction of its bulk value. For<br />
example, the bulk thermal conductivity in silicon is 148<br />
W/m/K and the thermal conductivity of a silicon film of<br />
thickness of 10 nm is 13 W/m/K (a factor of 10 smaller than<br />
the bulk value). Also, in thin silicon films the thermal<br />
conductivity has smaller temperature dependence because<br />
boundary scattering is temperature independent scattering<br />
process.<br />
II. THE ROLE OF THE TEMPERATURE BOUNDARY<br />
CONDITIONS<br />
In analog devices neighboring devices are typically on and if<br />
the gate contacts are also biased then there is no heat flow<br />
through the gate contact and the side boundaries. In these cases<br />
it is appropriate to use Neumann boundary conditions on the<br />
side (artificial) boundaries and Neumann boundary conditions<br />
on the gate electrode. Simulation results for the current<br />
degradation for different technology of FD SOI devices,<br />
summarized in Table 1, are presented in Figure 1.<br />
In the case of digital circuits, the devices are rarely on and<br />
the use of Dirichlet boundary conditions at the gate and the side<br />
boundaries are the appropriate boundary conditions. This<br />
corresponds to the best-case scenario of heat removal from the<br />
device active region. Simulation results for the current<br />
degradation for different technology devices when Dirichlet<br />
boundary conditions are applied to the gate and the side<br />
boundaries, are shown in Figure 2.<br />
Table 1. Parameters for various simulated device technology nodes (constant<br />
field scaling) [1].<br />
L<br />
(nm)<br />
tox<br />
(nm)<br />
t Si<br />
(nm)<br />
t box<br />
(nm)<br />
N ch<br />
(cm -3 )<br />
V GS=V DS<br />
(V)<br />
I D<br />
(mA/um)<br />
25 2 10 50 1×10 18 1.2 1.82<br />
45 2 18 60 1×10 18 1.2 1.41<br />
60 2 24 80 1×10 18 1.2 1.14<br />
80 2 32 100 1×10 17 1.5 1.78<br />
90 2 36 120 1×10 17 1.5 1.67<br />
100 2 40 140 1×10 17 1.5 1.57<br />
120 3 48 160 1×10 17 1.8 1.37<br />
140 3 56 180 1×10 17 1.8 1.23<br />
180 3 72 200 1×10 17 1.8 1.03<br />
L- Gate Length; tox- Gate Oxide Thickness;<br />
t Si- Active Si Layer Thickness;<br />
t box- BOX Thickness;<br />
N ch- Channel Doping Concentration;<br />
I D- Isothermal current value (300K).<br />
Degradation (%)<br />
100<br />
75<br />
50<br />
25<br />
300K<br />
400K<br />
600K<br />
Neumann<br />
0<br />
50 100 150<br />
Gate Length (nm)<br />
Figure 1. Current degradation vs. technology generation ranging from 25 nm to<br />
180 nm channel length FD SOI devices (Table 1). Isothermal boundary<br />
condition of 300K is set on the bottom of the BOX. Parameter is the<br />
temperature on the gate electrode. Neumann boundary conditions are applied at<br />
the vertical sides.<br />
Degradation (%)<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
300K<br />
Neumann<br />
0<br />
50 100 150<br />
Gate Length (nm)<br />
Figure 2. Current degradation for the case of Dirichlet boundary conditions at<br />
the artificial boundaries. In one case Dirichlet boundary conditions are applied<br />
at the gate electrode with T Gate=300 K and in the second case Neumann<br />
boundary conditions are applied at the gate electrode.<br />
©<strong>EDA</strong> <strong>Publishing</strong>/THERMINIC 2009 195<br />
ISBN: 978-2-35500-010-2