27.01.2015 Views

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7-9 October 2009, Leuven, Belgium<br />

Electro-Thermal Modeling of Nano-Scale Devices<br />

D. Vasileska 1 , K. Raleva 2 and S. M. Goodnick 1<br />

1 Department of Electrical Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-5706, USA<br />

2 Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, University Sts. Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, Republic of<br />

Macedonia<br />

Abstract-In this paper we present simulation results obtained with<br />

our electro-thermal device simulator when modeling different<br />

technology generations of FD-SOI devices. In particular, we stress<br />

out the importance of the temperature boundary conditions for<br />

digital and analog circuits and the use of the full model which<br />

takes into account both temperature and thickness dependence<br />

(which is particularly important for thin silicon films) of the<br />

thermal conductivity.<br />

Key-words: electro-thermal modeling, FDSOI devices,<br />

particle-based device simulations<br />

I. INTRODUCTION<br />

The scaling of semiconductor devices into the nanometer<br />

regime and the problems associated with further<br />

miniaturization of device technologies has resulted into<br />

investigation of devices with alternative materials and<br />

alternative device designs such as fully-depleted (FD), dualgate<br />

(DG), tri-gate silicon-on-insulator (SOI) and other device<br />

designs. The problem with SOI devices is that they exhibit selfheating<br />

effects. These self-heating effects arise from the fact<br />

that the underlying SiO 2 layer has about 100 times smaller<br />

thermal conductivity than bulk Si (1.4 W/m/K). Also, the<br />

thickness of the silicon film in nanoscale devices is much<br />

smaller than the phonon mean free path which is on the order<br />

of 300 nm in bulk silicon. Therefore, boundary scattering<br />

becomes dominant scattering mechanism, thus reducing the<br />

thermal conductivity value to a fraction of its bulk value. For<br />

example, the bulk thermal conductivity in silicon is 148<br />

W/m/K and the thermal conductivity of a silicon film of<br />

thickness of 10 nm is 13 W/m/K (a factor of 10 smaller than<br />

the bulk value). Also, in thin silicon films the thermal<br />

conductivity has smaller temperature dependence because<br />

boundary scattering is temperature independent scattering<br />

process.<br />

II. THE ROLE OF THE TEMPERATURE BOUNDARY<br />

CONDITIONS<br />

In analog devices neighboring devices are typically on and if<br />

the gate contacts are also biased then there is no heat flow<br />

through the gate contact and the side boundaries. In these cases<br />

it is appropriate to use Neumann boundary conditions on the<br />

side (artificial) boundaries and Neumann boundary conditions<br />

on the gate electrode. Simulation results for the current<br />

degradation for different technology of FD SOI devices,<br />

summarized in Table 1, are presented in Figure 1.<br />

In the case of digital circuits, the devices are rarely on and<br />

the use of Dirichlet boundary conditions at the gate and the side<br />

boundaries are the appropriate boundary conditions. This<br />

corresponds to the best-case scenario of heat removal from the<br />

device active region. Simulation results for the current<br />

degradation for different technology devices when Dirichlet<br />

boundary conditions are applied to the gate and the side<br />

boundaries, are shown in Figure 2.<br />

Table 1. Parameters for various simulated device technology nodes (constant<br />

field scaling) [1].<br />

L<br />

(nm)<br />

tox<br />

(nm)<br />

t Si<br />

(nm)<br />

t box<br />

(nm)<br />

N ch<br />

(cm -3 )<br />

V GS=V DS<br />

(V)<br />

I D<br />

(mA/um)<br />

25 2 10 50 1×10 18 1.2 1.82<br />

45 2 18 60 1×10 18 1.2 1.41<br />

60 2 24 80 1×10 18 1.2 1.14<br />

80 2 32 100 1×10 17 1.5 1.78<br />

90 2 36 120 1×10 17 1.5 1.67<br />

100 2 40 140 1×10 17 1.5 1.57<br />

120 3 48 160 1×10 17 1.8 1.37<br />

140 3 56 180 1×10 17 1.8 1.23<br />

180 3 72 200 1×10 17 1.8 1.03<br />

L- Gate Length; tox- Gate Oxide Thickness;<br />

t Si- Active Si Layer Thickness;<br />

t box- BOX Thickness;<br />

N ch- Channel Doping Concentration;<br />

I D- Isothermal current value (300K).<br />

Degradation (%)<br />

100<br />

75<br />

50<br />

25<br />

300K<br />

400K<br />

600K<br />

Neumann<br />

0<br />

50 100 150<br />

Gate Length (nm)<br />

Figure 1. Current degradation vs. technology generation ranging from 25 nm to<br />

180 nm channel length FD SOI devices (Table 1). Isothermal boundary<br />

condition of 300K is set on the bottom of the BOX. Parameter is the<br />

temperature on the gate electrode. Neumann boundary conditions are applied at<br />

the vertical sides.<br />

Degradation (%)<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

300K<br />

Neumann<br />

0<br />

50 100 150<br />

Gate Length (nm)<br />

Figure 2. Current degradation for the case of Dirichlet boundary conditions at<br />

the artificial boundaries. In one case Dirichlet boundary conditions are applied<br />

at the gate electrode with T Gate=300 K and in the second case Neumann<br />

boundary conditions are applied at the gate electrode.<br />

©<strong>EDA</strong> <strong>Publishing</strong>/THERMINIC 2009 195<br />

ISBN: 978-2-35500-010-2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!