Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association
Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association
Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
7-9 October 2009, Leuven, Belgium<br />
Pixel-by-Pixel Calibration of a CCD Camera Based<br />
Thermoreflectance Thermography System with<br />
Nanometer Resolution<br />
Mihai G. BURZO, Pavel L. KOMAROV and Peter E. RAAD*,<br />
IEEE Conference <strong>Publishing</strong><br />
Southern Methodist University and TMX Scientific,<br />
5232 Tennyson Pkwy, Bldg. 2, Plano, TX 75024, U.S.A.<br />
Abstract- This work presents for the first time a method for<br />
calibrating pixel-by-pixel and in-situ a CCD camera-based<br />
thermoreflectance thermography system with nanometer<br />
spatial resolution. Using the thermoreflectance method to<br />
determine the temperature map of an activated device requires<br />
two steps: first, the thermal image is acquired using a CCD<br />
camera or laser-diode set-up and, second, the obtained thermal<br />
image is converted to the actual temperature map by<br />
multiplying each pixel of the thermal image with the<br />
corresponding thermoreflectance coefficient. The critical aspect<br />
is that even if the thermoreflectance coefficient is known, or<br />
measured independently for each surface material, converting<br />
the thermal image to the temperature map requires building<br />
manually the exact corresponding map of the<br />
thermoreflectance coefficient, which sometimes can be difficult.<br />
In addition, the thermoreflectance coefficient is highly<br />
dependent on the wavelength of the probing light, numerical<br />
aperture, focus level, light uniformity, and other measurement<br />
effects. To mitigate these issues, one must obtain the<br />
thermoreflectance coefficient map of the same measurement<br />
area of interest, while ensuring that the same objective lens is<br />
used, the same focus level is maintained, and the same exact<br />
position is kept for frame acquisition at both the low and high<br />
temperature settings. To satisfy all of these requirements, the<br />
position of the sample must be adjusted in 3D space with<br />
nanometer spatial resolution.<br />
I. INTRODUCTION<br />
Thermal management of microelectronic microstructures<br />
is becoming more and more crucial with the progress to<br />
nanotechnology, increase in element power density and,<br />
circuits being packaged closer and closer together. For large<br />
devices and board level scales (few micrometers and above)<br />
the technology today is at the point where anyone in need of<br />
measuring the thermal behavior of electronic devices can<br />
choose from an array of both scientific and commercial<br />
measuring systems with each apparatus being best for certain<br />
applications with most working well for most application.<br />
Nonetheless when dealing with submicron and nanometer<br />
scale devices the choice of thermal measurement systems is<br />
limited with most, if not all systems, being still in R&D or<br />
scientific/lab prototype phase at best. Among the available<br />
technologies the thermoreflectance thermography method is<br />
so far one of the methods that have been successfully<br />
employed to make submicron temperature mappings [1-3]<br />
but still has its limitations. The thermoreflectance method<br />
has important advantages over contact and other optical<br />
methods since it is non-contact and non-destructive, costeffective,<br />
can produce both steady-state and transient surface<br />
temperature, provides accurate results with excellent<br />
submicron spatial and thermal resolutions.<br />
Thermoreflectance microscopy is based on the physical<br />
principle that a change in the temperature of a given surface<br />
causes a small change in that surface reflectivity. To<br />
measure the temperature change, ΔT, one needs to measure<br />
the relative change in the reflectivity of the sample, ΔR/R,<br />
and the small thermoreflectance calibration coefficient, C TR .<br />
The thermoreflectance coefficient defines the rate of change<br />
in the surface reflectivity as a function of the change in<br />
surface temperature. The C TR coefficient is strongly<br />
dependent on the material under test, the wavelength of the<br />
probing laser [4, 5], and the composition of the sample [5].<br />
For example, in the case of gold [6] the value of the C TR<br />
coefficient changes from positive to zero to negative values<br />
only by changing the wavelength from 400 to 600nm.<br />
When using a CCD camera bases thermoreflectance<br />
thermography system for thermal mapping of an active<br />
electronic device, the investigator ends up with one 2D<br />
surface map for the relative change in the reflectivity of the<br />
sample, ΔR/R, and another 2D map of the C TR coefficient.<br />
Combining the two maps yield the temperature map of the<br />
device and at a quick glance it looks as a simple algebraic<br />
task, i.e., dividing each pixel value of the ΔR/R map with the<br />
corresponding pixel on the C TR map. Nevertheless, because<br />
during the calibration procedure the sample itself and the<br />
sample holder assembly is subject to thermal expansion that<br />
causes movement in the microns to tenths of microns range,<br />
and because the position of the sample during the<br />
calibrations and the ΔR/R data acquisition needs to be<br />
precisely the same, the procedure of combing the ΔR/R and<br />
C TR maps becomes a not so trivial task.<br />
©<strong>EDA</strong> <strong>Publishing</strong>/THERMINIC 2009 130<br />
ISBN: 978-2-35500-010-2