27.01.2015 Views

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7-9 October 2009, Leuven, Belgium<br />

Pixel-by-Pixel Calibration of a CCD Camera Based<br />

Thermoreflectance Thermography System with<br />

Nanometer Resolution<br />

Mihai G. BURZO, Pavel L. KOMAROV and Peter E. RAAD*,<br />

IEEE Conference <strong>Publishing</strong><br />

Southern Methodist University and TMX Scientific,<br />

5232 Tennyson Pkwy, Bldg. 2, Plano, TX 75024, U.S.A.<br />

Abstract- This work presents for the first time a method for<br />

calibrating pixel-by-pixel and in-situ a CCD camera-based<br />

thermoreflectance thermography system with nanometer<br />

spatial resolution. Using the thermoreflectance method to<br />

determine the temperature map of an activated device requires<br />

two steps: first, the thermal image is acquired using a CCD<br />

camera or laser-diode set-up and, second, the obtained thermal<br />

image is converted to the actual temperature map by<br />

multiplying each pixel of the thermal image with the<br />

corresponding thermoreflectance coefficient. The critical aspect<br />

is that even if the thermoreflectance coefficient is known, or<br />

measured independently for each surface material, converting<br />

the thermal image to the temperature map requires building<br />

manually the exact corresponding map of the<br />

thermoreflectance coefficient, which sometimes can be difficult.<br />

In addition, the thermoreflectance coefficient is highly<br />

dependent on the wavelength of the probing light, numerical<br />

aperture, focus level, light uniformity, and other measurement<br />

effects. To mitigate these issues, one must obtain the<br />

thermoreflectance coefficient map of the same measurement<br />

area of interest, while ensuring that the same objective lens is<br />

used, the same focus level is maintained, and the same exact<br />

position is kept for frame acquisition at both the low and high<br />

temperature settings. To satisfy all of these requirements, the<br />

position of the sample must be adjusted in 3D space with<br />

nanometer spatial resolution.<br />

I. INTRODUCTION<br />

Thermal management of microelectronic microstructures<br />

is becoming more and more crucial with the progress to<br />

nanotechnology, increase in element power density and,<br />

circuits being packaged closer and closer together. For large<br />

devices and board level scales (few micrometers and above)<br />

the technology today is at the point where anyone in need of<br />

measuring the thermal behavior of electronic devices can<br />

choose from an array of both scientific and commercial<br />

measuring systems with each apparatus being best for certain<br />

applications with most working well for most application.<br />

Nonetheless when dealing with submicron and nanometer<br />

scale devices the choice of thermal measurement systems is<br />

limited with most, if not all systems, being still in R&D or<br />

scientific/lab prototype phase at best. Among the available<br />

technologies the thermoreflectance thermography method is<br />

so far one of the methods that have been successfully<br />

employed to make submicron temperature mappings [1-3]<br />

but still has its limitations. The thermoreflectance method<br />

has important advantages over contact and other optical<br />

methods since it is non-contact and non-destructive, costeffective,<br />

can produce both steady-state and transient surface<br />

temperature, provides accurate results with excellent<br />

submicron spatial and thermal resolutions.<br />

Thermoreflectance microscopy is based on the physical<br />

principle that a change in the temperature of a given surface<br />

causes a small change in that surface reflectivity. To<br />

measure the temperature change, ΔT, one needs to measure<br />

the relative change in the reflectivity of the sample, ΔR/R,<br />

and the small thermoreflectance calibration coefficient, C TR .<br />

The thermoreflectance coefficient defines the rate of change<br />

in the surface reflectivity as a function of the change in<br />

surface temperature. The C TR coefficient is strongly<br />

dependent on the material under test, the wavelength of the<br />

probing laser [4, 5], and the composition of the sample [5].<br />

For example, in the case of gold [6] the value of the C TR<br />

coefficient changes from positive to zero to negative values<br />

only by changing the wavelength from 400 to 600nm.<br />

When using a CCD camera bases thermoreflectance<br />

thermography system for thermal mapping of an active<br />

electronic device, the investigator ends up with one 2D<br />

surface map for the relative change in the reflectivity of the<br />

sample, ΔR/R, and another 2D map of the C TR coefficient.<br />

Combining the two maps yield the temperature map of the<br />

device and at a quick glance it looks as a simple algebraic<br />

task, i.e., dividing each pixel value of the ΔR/R map with the<br />

corresponding pixel on the C TR map. Nevertheless, because<br />

during the calibration procedure the sample itself and the<br />

sample holder assembly is subject to thermal expansion that<br />

causes movement in the microns to tenths of microns range,<br />

and because the position of the sample during the<br />

calibrations and the ΔR/R data acquisition needs to be<br />

precisely the same, the procedure of combing the ΔR/R and<br />

C TR maps becomes a not so trivial task.<br />

©<strong>EDA</strong> <strong>Publishing</strong>/THERMINIC 2009 130<br />

ISBN: 978-2-35500-010-2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!