Technical b r Report - International Military Testing Association

and logic that it neck little cX:Zcntary except to wonder why, when the
problem c;\n be cast i::to SUCK sin;le terms, the solution to the problem
has no: 2~3 tigo beer. routinely applied.
Mr. IIcDowell’s y..lper 5s SO canv~ncinglp positive that it would
seem, fcr the A:T.Y .\I Icast, the solution is at ban-’4.
Shifting now tc .?r. t'.err prsviies a somewhat stark contrast. !ie
ignites SC:;?: d con~1~~r~tizn that we are hea>ed with ashes and wonder
as in the “Perils cf i‘zulizc” i: there can ever be a ha;py c::ding. fiy
followi::< .':.. i&r:' i:::Y!:Cr, the :ncst obvious answer uculd appear to be
a qualif ic,'. ";:+a'; ." :'..,;--.r.:..
. . . . . - LC-&^-. Lik;tyit\-te p: to &\-axpcsltcve
point, the need for rcrearc!: and
nanagemcnt 3y.ir.L1:ft I:?.s tc hccctc an lcttgx-21 force for prcduct mXl-
.
provenent a;:3 3: .:-1z;xt I 'CT. . effic:cr.f.,*. Had Dr. Kerr’s search of research
literature ttTe:i ;GZP*~~-.AT mere extcsive he xould have found a good deal
of SuF~cr:. :t;c ~.-y-7.:‘:--~ a. A..k.“ cf yin? &, Ixmsdainc, Glsser, Rigncy, !4ackie, and
even Earl Lz;.*s x::L,! not onlv he ionsoiing but might dispel his notions
of contrite.
Tf my IrxLq-ctation 05 these papers hss been ccrrect, I heartily
endorse not only :&I:. ~.afc:- ;ti::l hut their eqlication of factors which
obviate i~~3,e,ent~.tI0\;: of 2.53 into training action and their recorzendatiOX
fo:* ;asitiLc s:c:,,s f;:- cat31~,zing, facilitating and improving the
translation ‘and implementation process. Yet I think they hnvc not gone
far enoqh. \Shat seerii to me to bc missing arc n set of models for training
mansgcricnt , K&D management and a mcta model, superordinate to training and
K&D, cshic!i c0uI.i gnidc both the training community and the H&D community in
the spirit of intcgrckt ion, establish a11 the ncccssa~ intcrfnccs at all
le\pels of function In both training and training CF,D and proi’idc such mechanisms
as a Training Rcsenrch A,!risory Board and 1aSnrntory schools--in short, a model
which cou1J faci:it;itc the kin& of interactions all three of our speakers have
proposed in their o::n unique styles.
117
,