Technical b r Report - International Military Testing Association

Ii
of cases the “Elaybe” answer seemed to indicate concert with the nechanics
of the program, not necessarily the value.
Total finding some merit in the program:
Overall (all officers responding) 74.5%
LT ;tnd below 83.1::
LCDK and above \ 9
Army (of 10 responses) 80.0%
Ftarines (of 22 responses) 45.5%
2. Should srrch a progrxz be restricted to the junior officer only?
Ses 15.4% NO 83.6%
Xote: The most common response Lo "levc: it should be restricted
tom wa; al:
hel.pful all
3.
4.
5.
DO
on
below flag rank; however, m;lny felt such feedback would be
the k“iy to cm.
y,u feel that suctl :I system \;o:rld 11nve a significant effect
enlisted morale? ,
scs 61.52 so 15.x:; Don’t know 22.7%
If you -acre rated by your subordinates, would you considtl
these reports:
Quite seriously 33.49e Casually ?. .z
9G.RX
Seriously 57.4? 0 Other 5.3::
- -
If you found such reports adverse, would you attempt any changes
in your le;ldcrship techniques?
Ses 72.72 X0 0 Don't know A27 32
Note: This question elicited mxty comzxents, and in most cases the
"Don't know" answer was a qualified "Yes". That is, after consideration
of the source, her: LIIC program was run, whether they were isolated reports
or a trend, etc., a Leader,ship style change might be attempted.
6
6. Do you fcei that Com&nding Officers might gain by having a
similar evaluation m!tdc of then by their junior officers:
Ses 76.4;: X0 14.0% Don’t kr.ow 9.6%
221