Technical b r Report - International Military Testing Association

The dynamic at work in Factor III could rojt a,-tly !~c\ve been
I
labeled fanilial naturity and independence frm the Air I'crce/
familial imaturity and dependence on the Air +orce. The dynamic
was one of qrowtt, erred change iz focus of attchtior.. tA.5 tt1c far.11:
matuxcd, the wife bccane norc'!icterested in its devclo1,~~r.t and less
lr,tcrestea . :n her relatiohshil: to the Air Force.
f3ctar ;V provrucc an ihsiqht into the wives' ~ercc,!~tior; of
the currcht societal trend of dista-ce for the. r?ilitarv. The cobtim:
traversed the area bttwccn i:rideful identification with her s;;cuser;'
jcb nr:d the couple's relaticmshig to the Air Force to apolnqr.tlc
rezoz:itioh ar.d rejection of identification with the Air I'crce.
T!;c dt:sCrilltloh 0 f Iactor V *das a facet of wives' atti;udc
ti:at war r.cc
I
directly related to the Air F;orce as a fucctioning
or+3r.ization. Instead, it was ar, indication of the grcu? identifi-atic!:,'
I
disassociatioc m..onq the bwives of Air For& ~trsor.r.cl.
1
This within
Trcur bipclal-ity was ayparehtly a wry inrortant realit\* cf life ir;
9.e Air Force corui,ur.ity.
I
The dynsxic cxy?oscd in Factor "I was t'ifficult to intcrprct.
out rcf6xlir.q to causslity, it appeared t':ut Fhysical/'~sychological
!
separation CT proxicity/ideatificaticn attitudes were prcaeht in the
sarplc.
/
Factor VI: [*r&ably revealed an exFereatia1 attitude set about
regulation/restriction by the Air Force. The dynamic bctvetn wives’
feeiincs 0,5 yersoml. frcedon of action and restriction of action was
quite cbvious.
380
With