Technical b r Report - International Military Testing Association

his own hypnotic condition and complement hls further awareness by the
practice of TM. A heightened sense oi huslaa understanding l.6 hypothetically
in re:ch and the behavioral scientiet would be ready to analyze aspects
of con&clousness all but left to loagiinatlon and theological epeculatlon.
This exploration of inner space, a6 rith outer space, will not appeal to
everyone and to some conjures up threats to sanity and human integrity.
'TO motivate selected individuals to undergo experiences which to date have
generally proven enrlchlng should add excitement to learning while
nexlmlzlng performance and creativity.
'i'he person xho risks his own +ell being and those material thing6
acquired in the fully consclou6 realo of “getting and doing” will likely
reconsider goals and values when exposed to dlf?erent levels of c~neclousne68
in which spontanecus trial and error behavior are minimized. No
tendency to coerce learning and task behavior should be tolerated, but #hen
Selected lndlviduals master the experience o? altering their conscious
levels o? awareness, they will COEtribUte to greater creativity and COmposure
in their living and aorklng environcents. ?3oth political and rellglous
mcvenents have long profited fPC= having dedicated IndlvlduaIs and A
structured soth3d f>r preparing thegselven to face challenges as potential
opportunities. In effect to know ahat ConSCiOUS variables In alterod states
of awareness oren a su'bject to greater insight for accelerating learned
behavior, I believe, till reveal human resources only seldom tapped and
hardly ever articulated a6 hopeful attributes for personnel evaluation.
Jill you accept the existence of such a tochnlque as 3-f and does It
threaten or serve as an optlnlstlc note in searching for well-integrated
neasures to predict the ?Urther cxplorstlon of promising human resources?
Can We A??Trd to Deny Consclouszcss In ?ersonnel 3aluatlon?
‘ilhenever a prajacted diiscusslon of something like "states of consclousness"
Is put lnt3 written words, the fear that much of what is said till
seem beyond ratlonal csnprehension beglns to be very constraining. Cn the
other hand the scientific endeavor to plow a new section of thought is even
nore prOvoking. Xhether ny discourse on 'I?! will pique your interest or
dlsdaLn, really should not matter. The bnslc purpose is to Ict a newer
theoretical and experimental alternative be expressed 60 that personnel
evaluation does n3t become toa self satisfied with fundamental principles
Of human performance and the OriEln Of measurable qualities.
Surely, operant behavior can be interpreted as re6ultlng from the type
of environment the individual gains through sensation and genetic inheritancd.
!?owever, that cnvironmenta I awareness Is able to be altered by
variables which are not immediately perceptible. Zverythlng from the electromagnetic
fields and atc-spheric changes to psychic interference by adverse
energy patterns developed betKeen individuals seem to give us pause to
wonder what does cause behavior we tr:: to evaluate. In a recent publication
Roger6 (1973) made an cnllghtenlng review of sO%e new challenges in psychology
and pointedly questioned “Is tMs the only reality.” You need not
151