Technical b r Report - International Military Testing Association

More documents

Recommendations

Info

RESULTS OVERALL SIGNIFICANCE AT BETTER THAN .05 LEVEL. REQUIRED 7.82 OBTAINED H = 8.19 AFTER THE CORRECT ION ” Hc = 8.21 GROUP COHPARI SONS H I vs II LESS THAN .05 LEVEL - 2.51 I vs Ill HIGHER THAN .Ol LEVEL- 10.15 I vs IV HIGHER THAN .Ol LEVEL- 23.34 * , I / FIGURE I i I / I I
Ii 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. BIBLIOGRAPHY CURTIS, F.D. and WOOD, G.G., A study of the relative teaching value Of four common practices in correcting examination papers, School Review 1929, 37, 615-23 Hurlock, E.B., An evaluation of certain incentives used in school work, Journal of Educational Psychology. 1925, 16, 145-49 Page, E.B., Teacher conments and student performance; Journal of Educational Psychology. 1958, 49, 173-81 Plowman, L. and Stroud, J.B:, Effects of informing pupiis of the consequences of their responses to objective test questions. Journal of Educational Research, 1942, 36, 16-20 Sassenrath, J.M, and Garverick, C.M., Effects of differental feedback C*om examinations on retention and transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1965, 56, 259-63 Stone, G.R. The training function of examinations. Research report No, AFPT RC-TN-55-8, 1955. USAF Personnel training research center, Lack1 and Ai r Force Base. 128
Page 1 and 2:
UNCLASSIFIED,‘UNLIMITEDw “‘$1
Page 3 and 4:
-* . ‘: .;‘*nn. :: ;.... 1. . .
Page 5 and 6:
:: FOREWORD The 15th Annual Confere
Page 7 and 8:
.- . . . _ -._* _.-.,. ..-_. __...,
Page 9 and 10:
JJ Hemisfair Room Ground Floor 0845
Page 11 and 12:
1525 - 1515 1545 - 1600 1600 - 1630
Page 13 and 14:
1330 - 1350 1350 - 1420 1420 - 1435
Page 15 and 16:
1045 - 1100 1100 - 1130 1130 - 1145
Page 17 and 18:
Il 0845 - 0900 0900 - 0920 0920 - 0
Page 19 and 20:
1. II. III. IV. V. VI * VII. VIII:
Page 21 and 22:
XXII. &tics 06 &?&I .:CAdcfl’dl A
Page 23 and 24:
11 XLV. XLVI. XLVI I. XLVIII. XIX.
Page 25 and 26:
!’ For these reasons, then, I wel
Page 27 and 28:
effort, or some other factor, the f
Page 29 and 30:
This means we have to CJoid arbitra
Page 31 and 32:
44 Which means what, specifically?
Page 33 and 34:
-\ * . . Ladies and gentlemen, if w
Page 35 and 36:
. Participants: Synopsis MTA Sympos
Page 37 and 38:
Both recruiters aid counselors lost
Page 39 and 40:
.- -- . rests are timed. 1) e 8. Te
Page 41 and 42:
10. Research needs identified by hi
Page 43 and 44:
DEXEtOPHEX~ OF THE ARNED SERVICES V
Page 45 and 46:
I. ’ 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9 .I EX
Page 47 and 48:
Characteristics of the Battery The
Page 49 and 50:
magniture, with the perceptualmotor
Page 51 and 52:
the time, the development of these
Page 53 and 54:
ut rcoding comprehension item leads
Page 55 and 56:
DLL p,m PH~OKITY 1 (DLISDA, p - 0 0
Page 57 and 58:
Introduction * Enlisted Selection a
Page 59 and 60:
u tive to engage in relevant activi
Page 61 and 62:
operational use of the new ACB The
Page 63 and 64:
The quality of new accessions in th
Page 65 and 66:
Ii same job training, and therefore
Page 67 and 68:
I:* . Test.' .'. Ce~wxal 'Ability T
Page 69 and 70:
This is done by raring the speech o
Page 71 and 72:
the areas of electronics, mintenanc
Page 73 and 74:
A great amount of effort is being e
Page 75 and 76:
;Lv EXPERIMEXTAL, iWLTIMEDIr\ CAREE
Page 77 and 78:
(3) \~olumc introductions, chapter
Page 79 and 80:
*ro establish that the three groups
Page 81 and 82:
Discussion In this study, 20th expe
Page 83 and 84:
Optimal Utilization of On-the-Job-T
Page 85 and 86:
in the instrument, but most of the
Page 87 and 88:
Table 2 (Cont’d) ;I Week Producti
Page 89 and 90:
Tables 1 through 6 summarize the mo
Page 91 and 92:
Table 5 - - -Alternative Survey App
Page 93 and 94:
. Phase II of the OJT costing contr
Page 95 and 96:
still primitive, so measurements us
Page 97 and 98:
Air Force Specialty CodelJ 551X6 57
Page 99 and 100: Table 19 F Ratios for Test Specialt
Page 101 and 102: _-. . . ._A .-. Table 9 summarizes
Page 103 and 104: Figure 3 shows how the other test s
Page 105 and 106: _ I I / REFERENCES f i i Dunham, Al
Page 107 and 108: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY OJT COST SURV
Page 109 and 110: . . . . . . *. ’ . -. . . *’ .
Page 111 and 112: Ji PART A 1. How many trainees do y
Page 113 and 114: Part A (cont’d) i / Q Number \Jl-
Page 115 and 116: SYMPOSILW TRi.“cLATION OF TRAININ
Page 117 and 118: This lra~s ;IS to our third set 01
Page 119 and 120: SYMPOSIUM I! "TRANSIXCION OF TRAINI
Page 121 and 122: When the report is subnitted, it is
Page 123 and 124: . additional Army effort to adapt i
Page 125 and 126: Perh3ps those of vou i:> trnining m
Page 127 and 128: - ..\ . . i I Co ny dismay I found
Page 129 and 130: You can see, the block to the right
Page 131 and 132: 108
Page 133 and 134: . i I / Without cross-validation or
Page 135 and 136: , , . ., \: ; -* All TRAB projects
Page 137 and 138: SYMPOSIUM $RANSLATIOII OF TRAINIXG
Page 139 and 140: Dr. Kerr's major poi::::: are that
Page 141 and 142: TEST FEEDBACK AND TRdlNINC 0EiJECT:
Page 143 and 144: areas in which changes can be made-
Page 145 and 146: All quizzes were given in well ligh
Page 147 and 148: ESULTS A Kruskal - Wallis one way a
Page 149: we know that it does enhance perfor
Page 153 and 154: -L - - t. -. .‘.. .) -- .’ -a-
Page 155 and 156: I Knew I edce of -31 Product i s i
Page 157 and 158: Clerical-technical Al I narsmeters
Page 159 and 160: I . 2. 3. 0. 1335 1943 1948 1963 9.
Page 161 and 162: ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS, I CCORPCSATE2
Page 163 and 164: ASI -1?34567E(3 ,’ . I 140 .- .:
Page 165 and 166: Ii interested in building personal
Page 167 and 168: II Enclosure (3.) to CO TRACRN Ltr
Page 169 and 170: Friday a. Educational opportunities
Page 171 and 172: partlcularl:I eco-centered ~Jals. U
Page 173 and 174: - not suggest t3 you ieasibic stud:
Page 175 and 176: . agree with his own brand of cUn.l
Page 177 and 178: '. "IMPLICATIONS OF CARREL INSTRUCT
Page 179 and 180: ,.‘j :,;. ‘.: :. .:‘. ,_:1...
Page 181 and 182: 1.’ .; :,: ‘. . :, .,.. >.:..;;
Page 183 and 184: (S) The carrying hooks... 25 (cj By
Page 185 and 186: :: . . i: ,:>::. . . / : ,. :... .
Page 187 and 188: Ji &“l.:~ : i ; r t .,... : : ..,
Page 189 and 190: : ._ EVALUATE Instructor evaluating
Page 191 and 192: _ 7.. ;,;,,-;;,T-. :,;,,-;;,T-. ..
Page 193 and 194: PROPICIE::CY KEXS:J.Scr*.-. """UT I
Page 195 and 196: generally t!lcse In which the teste
Page 197 and 198: REFERENCES 1. McClelland, D. C. "Te
Page 199 and 200: i ILS LANDING WC1 RiL”l 3 6 INITI
Page 201 and 202:
TlIE PERSOXU'NEL ASD TRAA..T"IX:G E
Page 203 and 204:
-_... ..-..-. “._..--_-- --_ . ..
Page 205 and 206:
with a Course Achievement Test. Few
Page 207 and 208:
Y PTEP ACCEPTAXE Uhan first introdu
Page 209 and 210:
. i 2 " : these results could give
Page 211 and 212:
PT&P has made a constructive contri
Page 213 and 214:
0. i ., -, L- .- . * m i! . .‘.c
Page 215 and 216:
and skill requirements for each tec
Page 217 and 218:
numbers of sub-items under each ite
Page 219 and 220:
t - . . *. . .: _. . 196
Page 221 and 222:
. The System Achievement Test, beca
Page 223 and 224:
c . Ccn1raI rcj: me (crs) LA- . Exm
Page 225 and 226:
. . i f : . - ! .-----L - _ _ _ .-
Page 227 and 228:
5. Query subsystem. The query subsy
Page 229 and 230:
Looking to the future, we are worki
Page 231 and 232:
I .._ Lilt group oi hip:i achlcvc;S
Page 233 and 234:
variety of areas related directly 0
Page 235 and 236:
tr**is avail,;h:tb for measuring rc
Page 237 and 238:
WUork-up” (scoring, interpretat i
Page 239 and 240:
, I I . . . -‘- .- -. 216 \
Page 241 and 242:
%tLitlS:iCdll)’ significant Gilfc
Page 243 and 244:
SUBORDINATE MTINGS: Iv’liP NOT? W
Page 245 and 246:
Note: Lt is interesting to note tha
Page 247 and 248:
TABLE III Representative Comment:;
Page 249 and 250:
LCDR “I rton’t: t~~:l a .PO is
Page 251 and 252:
9 5 18 Effective Naval Officer 106
Page 253 and 254:
to you or other parsons in the bran
Page 255 and 256:
Subordinate rating% of a sort, have
Page 257 and 258:
Thc~ Kecslcr Study - Electronic Tec
Page 259 and 260:
II. After approximately thr\bC _vca
Page 261 and 262:
. ! . a Appendix A Sample 0: After
Page 263 and 264:
Appendix C SXlp IC of Delayed Fit?
Page 265 and 266:
1. GRADUATE’S JOI PROFICIEMCI: bd
Page 267 and 268:
8. In your judgmentwMch of the foUm
Page 269 and 270:
-- ----- - _--_- ..__ _____ Append
Page 271 and 272:
I Observation: I c Appendix E ; 1 S
Page 273 and 274:
performance testing dram in these t
Page 275 and 276:
1: order drill is a good military e
Page 277 and 278:
e found in the area of in:&personal
Page 279 and 280:
in a similar vein, the Amy is now e
Page 281 and 282:
For the evaluation of tht Fire Cont
Page 283 and 284:
adopted for the evaluation. illis s
Page 285 and 286:
_ AI’PFKDIX A ! EVALUATION CF STU
Page 287 and 288:
Student’s same Class 41 7. 3 . 1.
Page 289 and 290:
APPENDIX C SIXTH PERFOR~NCE EXAMINA
Page 291 and 292:
1 LLI:70 ?lar!Iinic: curse I- . - -
Page 293 and 294:
44 INTRODUCTION A new, more specifi
Page 295 and 296:
The Enlisted Evaluation Center is t
Page 297 and 298:
The mcijor iIrc3J arc wcightcd ncco
Page 299 and 300:
- step 1 PERFORM JOB ANALYSIS Ident
Page 301 and 302:
. . . ‘* , . . . . . .- . . *. .
Page 303 and 304:
-. ..- - .~... _ . _ __, , . . ..-
Page 305 and 306:
The Comprchcnsivc Occupational Data
Page 307 and 308:
~hc evaluation plans only cover tho
Page 309 and 310:
To appreciate the possible savings
Page 311 and 312:
m. study of output measurement cond
Page 313 and 314:
jobs. Table 8 defines officer duty
Page 315 and 316:
. . It Kas not possible to dcscriI)
Page 317 and 318:
RECOMMENDED APPROACHES AND Pl.ANS !
Page 319 and 320:
‘. Nevertheless, there arc severa
Page 321 and 322:
JJ intentions, a situation ripe for
Page 323 and 324:
,, - Systems engineering documentat
Page 325 and 326:
\ _ . ‘\ . , The test psychologis
Page 327 and 328:
and his Harvard colleagues (4) in t
Page 329 and 330:
i I / A comparison of experiences a
Page 331 and 332:
.f . 8 .,d *. I .*. \ . ‘,’ *.,
Page 333 and 334:
(SLIDE OFF) ‘f . .‘.J. Gomparis
Page 335 and 336:
! _..“. , (Sl,IDE 11 ON) ’ _’
Page 337 and 338:
means other than the objective type
Page 339 and 340:
Relatively few, including those of
Page 341 and 342:
psychologists who were unfam.iliar
Page 343 and 344:
. Popham’s reason 8 (6e) is shown
Page 345 and 346:
: ) ‘1‘. ‘. ,---. .’ \ : i
Page 347 and 348:
In our experience. some instructors
Page 349 and 350:
t . ’ -.* ., .! as punishment and
Page 351 and 352:
- -.. . bEcause they attempted more
Page 353 and 354:
3b. 3c. 1. 5. 6. Ga. 6b. (iC. 6d. G
Page 355 and 356:
“V’ SYSTEAfS ENGINEERING PROCES
Page 357 and 358:
. . . - ‘-..’ ‘. . . - - A ,
Page 359 and 360:
, 336 , L 0 A u a > - a . . u a* =
Page 361 and 362:
. S:,IDE 7
Page 363 and 364:
-- ‘ . -. ..’ ._:._. . . _ . .
Page 365 and 366:
342 . ,I i / .-. - . _ . 3LIUC 11
Page 367 and 368:
344 U SL:IDE 13
Page 369 and 370:
3 _ . _ , : . _‘, . . 346 SLIDE 1
Page 371 and 372:
. . 348 / I 1
Page 373 and 374:
REA SQW 80 -0 ” WtlILE LOOSE GENE
Page 375 and 376:
.: _._’ _ . . . .:.-*..‘. . - -
Page 377 and 378:
: ’ . . 1 t I ,! . f / \ . SLIDE
Page 379 and 380:
. ‘. . . . I... _ . _ - 1 1 . -0
Page 381 and 382:
, . : CRITERIOX REFERESCED PERFOftW
Page 383 and 384:
fie first is that we start by defin
Page 385 and 386:
In the design of our performance te
Page 387 and 388:
now provide realistic cues which il
Page 389 and 390:
test situation one time will not ne
Page 391 and 392:
The experimental design plan called
Page 393 and 394:
. The Combat Performance sub-portio
Page 395 and 396:
that these are problems of techniqu
Page 397 and 398:
A major corporation gives gold char
Page 399 and 400:
exyar.8 t5is to excmi::e I-.cu her
Page 401 and 402:
Ii A listing of al.1 hoxw addresses
Page 403 and 404:
The dynamic at work in Factor III c
Page 405 and 406:
detailed ar.d comprehensive analysi
Page 407 and 408:
Although numerous compiaints were v
Page 409 and 410:
The various group comparisons made
Page 411 and 412:
REFERENCES Belt, John A., and Parro
Page 413 and 414:
Factor I: Passive alienation/integr
Page 415 and 416:
-. Factor V: Within subculture iden
Page 417:
-I - -. . . . . . ‘. Variable Cum
show all

Technical b r Report - International Military Testing Association

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?