Technical b r Report - International Military Testing Association

_
as field problems and weapons firi~t;. The instructor iaces massive
prohlems of priority.
(SLIDE 3 OFF)
The multiple demands upon the ins!ructot .‘s time and attention account
in pa1.t for the spectrum of response to the requirement for perform-
ance testing. 1 en?phasize the word spectrum, for a spectral responsr
did occur, varying from, “Great, I’m dc,ing real world performance
testing already, ” to “NO way. ” !Ve applaud the former and the many
who flocked to it in short order, but it was those on the “No way” end
of the scale who required the most attention.
.
This paper deals with dynamics of tmhange. If a given reaction or
I
attitude was encountered at 41, it is discusse,d here for its dynamics,
I
1
not for its frequency.
Quality controllers conducted a set ies of fre -wheeling meetings with
groups of 10 to 20 instructors at a time to
f
SL irface
problems and to
establish the kind of dialogue and openness,which Doll and his Louis-
ville associates (la) belie\-e essential.
i
if
i
The problems surfaced bore a -’
marked resemblance in kind if not in content to. those reported by Gross
303
. . . : /
: ;.