23.11.2012 Views

Technical b r Report - International Military Testing Association

Technical b r Report - International Military Testing Association

Technical b r Report - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

.<br />

TL<br />

Mean post-test score<br />

of Es Gp 1 (revised<br />

text, audio supplement)<br />

I<br />

72.80<br />

Mean post-test score<br />

of Lx Cp 2 (revised<br />

text only)<br />

76.00<br />

Mean post-test score<br />

of Es Gp 2 (revised<br />

text only)<br />

Table 4<br />

T3<br />

Mean post-test score<br />

of control group<br />

t d.f. E<br />

66.75 2.258 47.0 .06<br />

Yean post-test score<br />

of control group<br />

66.75 3.227 41.0 .05<br />

Mean post-test score<br />

of Ex Gp 1 (revised<br />

text, audio supplcrwnt)<br />

76.00 72.80 .967 42.0 .44<br />

The inferences from Table J are that both the audio supplemented CDC<br />

and the revised text only CDC yielded significantly higher grades than the<br />

regular CDC. However, there was no significant difference in the final<br />

course grades of the two experimental grwps.<br />

To establish the equivalency of the compietion times, 'a one-way<br />

analysis of variance was made on their means. This analysis is shohn in<br />

Table 5.<br />

Table 5<br />

Source of Vciriat ion F d.f. IT<br />

COl:pietion time of<br />

CDC in days 0.064 2,65 = .9,383<br />

The indication of this analysis is that the CDC completion times for<br />

the three groups were not significantly different.<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!