Technical b r Report - International Military Testing Association

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References Flanagan, J. The Critical Incident Technique., Ps~cl~olpgical Bul.l.etin, 1954, 51, 327-358. Lutrell, H. Performance Appraisal at Apex Corporation: Discovery -- Or Delusion? Sational hsiness, >!arch 1?72. . 233
Thc~ Kecslcr Study - Electronic Technicians Four year Evaluation or’ Turce Types of Training r’ Virginia Zachcrt. Ph.D. Consultnnt ’ Fledicnl College of Ccorgin Augusta. Georgia r I (For tin> 1973 <strong>Military</strong> <strong>Testing</strong> Associ.!tion Conference San Antonio, Texas. 31 October l9i3) j ..i : 1. i f- IXTRODCCTIOS A Dcp:irtmcnt o f :! Dciensc servicetc’st program W’.IS cst;lblishc~d i n 19S5 a t Reesl(tr Air Farce Bnsc. Xississippi, to explore ::.lys to reduce, the* tin,1 and cost of training non-prior service airmc>n to p,lrforn as cltictronic cquipmcnt repairmen. mo occup3t ion3 ! specialists and two narkcd ly di ffercbnt ;Ipprc.lchL\s to training were compared with a control group. During the year 196b. 441 gradu:it~*s of the four expcrimontal course’s were m.rtchccI with 294 control graduates .,i corresponding tx~gulnr courses and assigntad to field units in four commands. Job periormince data wt’rc collected throughout their first active duty tour and annlyzk-d to coap~rc~ their success on the job. .. There ~t’re f ivc major evaluation steps as fotlo6: TECRSIC:UES I’SED Xi tar-Course Profir icncy Test nt Xecslcr Tcchinicnl Tr;Lining Ccntc>r the first crc~ck following graduation. (Appendix A) First-Job Profic’iency Evaluation - first :cn’ weeks on the job. (Xppcndis 6) e 1 i Delayed Field Evaluation - nine months after completion cl resident training. (Append is C) Second-Job Proficiency Evaluation - n[trr two years on the job. (Append ix D) First EnIisLncnt Termination Survc*y - at initial active duty tour. (Appendix E) f Th-o following tecllniqucs were used to gather e Pcrfcrmnnce and written tests administered to graduatt-s. Job Proficiency appraisals by iicld supervisors. Nailed qucstionnlires completed by graduntcs and their supervisors. Field uisi.ts by cvaluntion ccam members. Survey of records at Air Reserve Personnel C~~ntc~r.
Page 1 and 2:
UNCLASSIFIED,‘UNLIMITEDw “‘$1
Page 3 and 4:
-* . ‘: .;‘*nn. :: ;.... 1. . .
Page 5 and 6:
:: FOREWORD The 15th Annual Confere
Page 7 and 8:
.- . . . _ -._* _.-.,. ..-_. __...,
Page 9 and 10:
JJ Hemisfair Room Ground Floor 0845
Page 11 and 12:
1525 - 1515 1545 - 1600 1600 - 1630
Page 13 and 14:
1330 - 1350 1350 - 1420 1420 - 1435
Page 15 and 16:
1045 - 1100 1100 - 1130 1130 - 1145
Page 17 and 18:
Il 0845 - 0900 0900 - 0920 0920 - 0
Page 19 and 20:
1. II. III. IV. V. VI * VII. VIII:
Page 21 and 22:
XXII. &tics 06 &?&I .:CAdcfl’dl A
Page 23 and 24:
11 XLV. XLVI. XLVI I. XLVIII. XIX.
Page 25 and 26:
!’ For these reasons, then, I wel
Page 27 and 28:
effort, or some other factor, the f
Page 29 and 30:
This means we have to CJoid arbitra
Page 31 and 32:
44 Which means what, specifically?
Page 33 and 34:
-\ * . . Ladies and gentlemen, if w
Page 35 and 36:
. Participants: Synopsis MTA Sympos
Page 37 and 38:
Both recruiters aid counselors lost
Page 39 and 40:
.- -- . rests are timed. 1) e 8. Te
Page 41 and 42:
10. Research needs identified by hi
Page 43 and 44:
DEXEtOPHEX~ OF THE ARNED SERVICES V
Page 45 and 46:
I. ’ 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9 .I EX
Page 47 and 48:
Characteristics of the Battery The
Page 49 and 50:
magniture, with the perceptualmotor
Page 51 and 52:
the time, the development of these
Page 53 and 54:
ut rcoding comprehension item leads
Page 55 and 56:
DLL p,m PH~OKITY 1 (DLISDA, p - 0 0
Page 57 and 58:
Introduction * Enlisted Selection a
Page 59 and 60:
u tive to engage in relevant activi
Page 61 and 62:
operational use of the new ACB The
Page 63 and 64:
The quality of new accessions in th
Page 65 and 66:
Ii same job training, and therefore
Page 67 and 68:
I:* . Test.' .'. Ce~wxal 'Ability T
Page 69 and 70:
This is done by raring the speech o
Page 71 and 72:
the areas of electronics, mintenanc
Page 73 and 74:
A great amount of effort is being e
Page 75 and 76:
;Lv EXPERIMEXTAL, iWLTIMEDIr\ CAREE
Page 77 and 78:
(3) \~olumc introductions, chapter
Page 79 and 80:
*ro establish that the three groups
Page 81 and 82:
Discussion In this study, 20th expe
Page 83 and 84:
Optimal Utilization of On-the-Job-T
Page 85 and 86:
in the instrument, but most of the
Page 87 and 88:
Table 2 (Cont’d) ;I Week Producti
Page 89 and 90:
Tables 1 through 6 summarize the mo
Page 91 and 92:
Table 5 - - -Alternative Survey App
Page 93 and 94:
. Phase II of the OJT costing contr
Page 95 and 96:
still primitive, so measurements us
Page 97 and 98:
Air Force Specialty CodelJ 551X6 57
Page 99 and 100:
Table 19 F Ratios for Test Specialt
Page 101 and 102:
_-. . . ._A .-. Table 9 summarizes
Page 103 and 104:
Figure 3 shows how the other test s
Page 105 and 106:
_ I I / REFERENCES f i i Dunham, Al
Page 107 and 108:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY OJT COST SURV
Page 109 and 110:
. . . . . . *. ’ . -. . . *’ .
Page 111 and 112:
Ji PART A 1. How many trainees do y
Page 113 and 114:
Part A (cont’d) i / Q Number \Jl-
Page 115 and 116:
SYMPOSILW TRi.“cLATION OF TRAININ
Page 117 and 118:
This lra~s ;IS to our third set 01
Page 119 and 120:
SYMPOSIUM I! "TRANSIXCION OF TRAINI
Page 121 and 122:
When the report is subnitted, it is
Page 123 and 124:
. additional Army effort to adapt i
Page 125 and 126:
Perh3ps those of vou i:> trnining m
Page 127 and 128:
- ..\ . . i I Co ny dismay I found
Page 129 and 130:
You can see, the block to the right
Page 131 and 132:
108
Page 133 and 134:
. i I / Without cross-validation or
Page 135 and 136:
, , . ., \: ; -* All TRAB projects
Page 137 and 138:
SYMPOSIUM $RANSLATIOII OF TRAINIXG
Page 139 and 140:
Dr. Kerr's major poi::::: are that
Page 141 and 142:
TEST FEEDBACK AND TRdlNINC 0EiJECT:
Page 143 and 144:
areas in which changes can be made-
Page 145 and 146:
All quizzes were given in well ligh
Page 147 and 148:
ESULTS A Kruskal - Wallis one way a
Page 149 and 150:
we know that it does enhance perfor
Page 151 and 152:
Ii 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. BIBLIOGRAPHY C
Page 153 and 154:
-L - - t. -. .‘.. .) -- .’ -a-
Page 155 and 156:
I Knew I edce of -31 Product i s i
Page 157 and 158:
Clerical-technical Al I narsmeters
Page 159 and 160:
I . 2. 3. 0. 1335 1943 1948 1963 9.
Page 161 and 162:
ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS, I CCORPCSATE2
Page 163 and 164:
ASI -1?34567E(3 ,’ . I 140 .- .:
Page 165 and 166:
Ii interested in building personal
Page 167 and 168:
II Enclosure (3.) to CO TRACRN Ltr
Page 169 and 170:
Friday a. Educational opportunities
Page 171 and 172:
partlcularl:I eco-centered ~Jals. U
Page 173 and 174:
- not suggest t3 you ieasibic stud:
Page 175 and 176:
. agree with his own brand of cUn.l
Page 177 and 178:
'. "IMPLICATIONS OF CARREL INSTRUCT
Page 179 and 180:
,.‘j :,;. ‘.: :. .:‘. ,_:1...
Page 181 and 182:
1.’ .; :,: ‘. . :, .,.. >.:..;;
Page 183 and 184:
(S) The carrying hooks... 25 (cj By
Page 185 and 186:
:: . . i: ,:>::. . . / : ,. :... .
Page 187 and 188:
Ji &“l.:~ : i ; r t .,... : : ..,
Page 189 and 190:
: ._ EVALUATE Instructor evaluating
Page 191 and 192:
_ 7.. ;,;,,-;;,T-. :,;,,-;;,T-. ..
Page 193 and 194:
PROPICIE::CY KEXS:J.Scr*.-. """UT I
Page 195 and 196:
generally t!lcse In which the teste
Page 197 and 198:
REFERENCES 1. McClelland, D. C. "Te
Page 199 and 200:
i ILS LANDING WC1 RiL”l 3 6 INITI
Page 201 and 202:
TlIE PERSOXU'NEL ASD TRAA..T"IX:G E
Page 203 and 204:
-_... ..-..-. “._..--_-- --_ . ..
Page 205 and 206: with a Course Achievement Test. Few
Page 207 and 208: Y PTEP ACCEPTAXE Uhan first introdu
Page 209 and 210: . i 2 " : these results could give
Page 211 and 212: PT&P has made a constructive contri
Page 213 and 214: 0. i ., -, L- .- . * m i! . .‘.c
Page 215 and 216: and skill requirements for each tec
Page 217 and 218: numbers of sub-items under each ite
Page 219 and 220: t - . . *. . .: _. . 196
Page 221 and 222: . The System Achievement Test, beca
Page 223 and 224: c . Ccn1raI rcj: me (crs) LA- . Exm
Page 225 and 226: . . i f : . - ! .-----L - _ _ _ .-
Page 227 and 228: 5. Query subsystem. The query subsy
Page 229 and 230: Looking to the future, we are worki
Page 231 and 232: I .._ Lilt group oi hip:i achlcvc;S
Page 233 and 234: variety of areas related directly 0
Page 235 and 236: tr**is avail,;h:tb for measuring rc
Page 237 and 238: WUork-up” (scoring, interpretat i
Page 239 and 240: , I I . . . -‘- .- -. 216 \
Page 241 and 242: %tLitlS:iCdll)’ significant Gilfc
Page 243 and 244: SUBORDINATE MTINGS: Iv’liP NOT? W
Page 245 and 246: Note: Lt is interesting to note tha
Page 247 and 248: TABLE III Representative Comment:;
Page 249 and 250: LCDR “I rton’t: t~~:l a .PO is
Page 251 and 252: 9 5 18 Effective Naval Officer 106
Page 253 and 254: to you or other parsons in the bran
Page 255: Subordinate rating% of a sort, have
Page 259 and 260: II. After approximately thr\bC _vca
Page 261 and 262: . ! . a Appendix A Sample 0: After
Page 263 and 264: Appendix C SXlp IC of Delayed Fit?
Page 265 and 266: 1. GRADUATE’S JOI PROFICIEMCI: bd
Page 267 and 268: 8. In your judgmentwMch of the foUm
Page 269 and 270: -- ----- - _--_- ..__ _____ Append
Page 271 and 272: I Observation: I c Appendix E ; 1 S
Page 273 and 274: performance testing dram in these t
Page 275 and 276: 1: order drill is a good military e
Page 277 and 278: e found in the area of in:&personal
Page 279 and 280: in a similar vein, the Amy is now e
Page 281 and 282: For the evaluation of tht Fire Cont
Page 283 and 284: adopted for the evaluation. illis s
Page 285 and 286: _ AI’PFKDIX A ! EVALUATION CF STU
Page 287 and 288: Student’s same Class 41 7. 3 . 1.
Page 289 and 290: APPENDIX C SIXTH PERFOR~NCE EXAMINA
Page 291 and 292: 1 LLI:70 ?lar!Iinic: curse I- . - -
Page 293 and 294: 44 INTRODUCTION A new, more specifi
Page 295 and 296: The Enlisted Evaluation Center is t
Page 297 and 298: The mcijor iIrc3J arc wcightcd ncco
Page 299 and 300: - step 1 PERFORM JOB ANALYSIS Ident
Page 301 and 302: . . . ‘* , . . . . . .- . . *. .
Page 303 and 304: -. ..- - .~... _ . _ __, , . . ..-
Page 305 and 306: The Comprchcnsivc Occupational Data
Page 307 and 308:
~hc evaluation plans only cover tho
Page 309 and 310:
To appreciate the possible savings
Page 311 and 312:
m. study of output measurement cond
Page 313 and 314:
jobs. Table 8 defines officer duty
Page 315 and 316:
. . It Kas not possible to dcscriI)
Page 317 and 318:
RECOMMENDED APPROACHES AND Pl.ANS !
Page 319 and 320:
‘. Nevertheless, there arc severa
Page 321 and 322:
JJ intentions, a situation ripe for
Page 323 and 324:
,, - Systems engineering documentat
Page 325 and 326:
\ _ . ‘\ . , The test psychologis
Page 327 and 328:
and his Harvard colleagues (4) in t
Page 329 and 330:
i I / A comparison of experiences a
Page 331 and 332:
.f . 8 .,d *. I .*. \ . ‘,’ *.,
Page 333 and 334:
(SLIDE OFF) ‘f . .‘.J. Gomparis
Page 335 and 336:
! _..“. , (Sl,IDE 11 ON) ’ _’
Page 337 and 338:
means other than the objective type
Page 339 and 340:
Relatively few, including those of
Page 341 and 342:
psychologists who were unfam.iliar
Page 343 and 344:
. Popham’s reason 8 (6e) is shown
Page 345 and 346:
: ) ‘1‘. ‘. ,---. .’ \ : i
Page 347 and 348:
In our experience. some instructors
Page 349 and 350:
t . ’ -.* ., .! as punishment and
Page 351 and 352:
- -.. . bEcause they attempted more
Page 353 and 354:
3b. 3c. 1. 5. 6. Ga. 6b. (iC. 6d. G
Page 355 and 356:
“V’ SYSTEAfS ENGINEERING PROCES
Page 357 and 358:
. . . - ‘-..’ ‘. . . - - A ,
Page 359 and 360:
, 336 , L 0 A u a > - a . . u a* =
Page 361 and 362:
. S:,IDE 7
Page 363 and 364:
-- ‘ . -. ..’ ._:._. . . _ . .
Page 365 and 366:
342 . ,I i / .-. - . _ . 3LIUC 11
Page 367 and 368:
344 U SL:IDE 13
Page 369 and 370:
3 _ . _ , : . _‘, . . 346 SLIDE 1
Page 371 and 372:
. . 348 / I 1
Page 373 and 374:
REA SQW 80 -0 ” WtlILE LOOSE GENE
Page 375 and 376:
.: _._’ _ . . . .:.-*..‘. . - -
Page 377 and 378:
: ’ . . 1 t I ,! . f / \ . SLIDE
Page 379 and 380:
. ‘. . . . I... _ . _ - 1 1 . -0
Page 381 and 382:
, . : CRITERIOX REFERESCED PERFOftW
Page 383 and 384:
fie first is that we start by defin
Page 385 and 386:
In the design of our performance te
Page 387 and 388:
now provide realistic cues which il
Page 389 and 390:
test situation one time will not ne
Page 391 and 392:
The experimental design plan called
Page 393 and 394:
. The Combat Performance sub-portio
Page 395 and 396:
that these are problems of techniqu
Page 397 and 398:
A major corporation gives gold char
Page 399 and 400:
exyar.8 t5is to excmi::e I-.cu her
Page 401 and 402:
Ii A listing of al.1 hoxw addresses
Page 403 and 404:
The dynamic at work in Factor III c
Page 405 and 406:
detailed ar.d comprehensive analysi
Page 407 and 408:
Although numerous compiaints were v
Page 409 and 410:
The various group comparisons made
Page 411 and 412:
REFERENCES Belt, John A., and Parro
Page 413 and 414:
Factor I: Passive alienation/integr
Page 415 and 416:
-. Factor V: Within subculture iden
Page 417:
-I - -. . . . . . ‘. Variable Cum
show all

Technical b r Report - International Military Testing Association

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?