12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PREFACE TO THE COLLECTION TWELVE YEARS105break with many <strong>of</strong> the circle traditions, forget and discardmany <strong>of</strong> the trivial features <strong>of</strong> circle activity and circlesquabbles, so as <strong>to</strong> concentrate on the tasks <strong>of</strong> Social-Democracyin the present period. Only the broadening <strong>of</strong> theParty by enlisting proletarian elements can, in conjunctionwith open mass activity, eradicate all the residue <strong>of</strong> thecircle spirit which has been inherited from the past and isunsuited <strong>to</strong> our present tasks. And the transition <strong>to</strong> a democraticallyorganised workers’ party, proclaimed by theBolsheviks in Novaya Zhizn 62 in November 1905,* i.e.,as soon as the conditions appeared for legal activity—thistransition was virtually an irrevocable break with theold circle ways that had outlived their day.Yes, “that had had outlived their day”, for it is not enough<strong>to</strong> condemn the old circle spirit; its significance in thespecial circumstances <strong>of</strong> the past period must be unders<strong>to</strong>od.The circles were necessary in their day and played apositive role. In an au<strong>to</strong>cratic state, especially in thesituation created by the whole his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> the Russian revolutionarymovement, the socialist workers’ party couldnot develop except from these circles. And the circles,i.e., close-knit, exclusive groups uniting a very smallnumber <strong>of</strong> people and nearly always based on personalfriendship, were a necessary stage in the development <strong>of</strong>socialism and the workers’ movement in Russia. As themovement grew, it was confronted with the task <strong>of</strong> unitingthese circles, forming strong links between them, and establishingcontinuity. This called for a firm base <strong>of</strong>operations “beyond the reach” <strong>of</strong> the au<strong>to</strong>cracy—i.e.,abroad. The circles abroad, therefore, came in<strong>to</strong> being throughnecessity. There was no contact between them; theyhad no authority over them in the shape <strong>of</strong> the Party inRussia, and it was inevitable that they should differ intheir understanding <strong>of</strong> the movement’s main tasks at thegiven stage, that is, an understanding <strong>of</strong> how exactly <strong>to</strong> setup a base <strong>of</strong> operations and in what way they could help<strong>to</strong> build the Party as a whole. A struggle betweenthe circles was, therefore, inevitable. Today, in retrospect,we can clearly see which <strong>of</strong> the circles was really in a posi-* See present edition, <strong>Vol</strong>. 10, pp. 29-39.—Ed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!