12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

176V. I. LENINIt is sufficient <strong>to</strong> note that even the bourgeois apologistHecht, quoted by David, admits as a fact the deteriorationin diet as a consequence <strong>of</strong> the substitution <strong>of</strong> cheap margarinefor marketed milk. This applies <strong>to</strong> South Germany,the region where small-peasant farming predominates.Concerning another region, East Prussia, we have the verysimilar statement <strong>of</strong> Klawki* that the small peasants “consumevery little butter and whole milk”.David’s bourgeois apologetics can be traced in absolutelyall the questions he deals with. Thus, he ex<strong>to</strong>ls the dairyco-operatives <strong>of</strong> Germany and Denmark in over a score <strong>of</strong>pages (4<strong>13</strong>-35 and others). He also quotes statistics ... bu<strong>to</strong>nly on the numerical growth <strong>of</strong> the co-operatives! Hedoes not quote the German statistics showing the concentration<strong>of</strong> “co-operative” dairy farming in the hands <strong>of</strong>big capitalist farms.** The Davids have a blind eye for suchdata in the statistics they handle!“The Danish peasants organised in co-operatives,” saysDavid, “have even excelled the privately owned farms <strong>of</strong>the big landed proprie<strong>to</strong>rs.” Then follows an example: aquotation from the 46th Report <strong>of</strong> a test labora<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>to</strong> theeffect that the butter produced by the co-operatives is <strong>of</strong>better quality than that manufactured by the landlord.And David continues:“Such results have been achieved by peasants who at one timeon their small farms, produced only inferior grades <strong>of</strong> butter forwhich they obtained only half the price paid for that <strong>of</strong> the bigproprie<strong>to</strong>rs. Moreover, by and large, we are dealing here with middleand small peasants [David’s italics]. In 1898, there were in Denmark179,740 cow-sheds <strong>of</strong> which only 7,544 or 4 per cent contained 30 ormore cows each; 49,371 or 27.82 per cent, each contained from 10<strong>to</strong> 29 cows, 122,589 or 68.97 per cent contained less than 10cows each. More than half <strong>of</strong> these cow-sheds, namely, 70,218, comprising39.85 per cent <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal, contained only from 1 <strong>to</strong> 3 cowseach, i.e., they belonged <strong>to</strong> quite small farms. That the great majority<strong>of</strong> these small farms belong <strong>to</strong> co-operative organisations is shownby the fact that in 1900 the milk <strong>of</strong> approximately 900,000 cows out<strong>of</strong> Denmark’s 1,110,000 milch cows was delivered <strong>to</strong> dairy co-operatives”(p. 424).Thus argues the scholarly David. He avoids quoting precisedata on the distribution <strong>of</strong> the cows among the farms* See present edition, <strong>Vol</strong>. 5, pp. 176-77.—Ed.** Ibid., p. 216.—Ed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!