12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AGRARIAN PROGRAMME OF SOCIAL-DEMOCRACY2951. WHAT IS NATIONALISATION OF THE LAND?Above we quoted the current formulation <strong>of</strong> the nowgenerally recognised proposition. “All the Narodnik groupsare advocating nationalisation <strong>of</strong> the land.” As a matter<strong>of</strong> fact, this current formulation is very inexact and thereis very little in it that is “generally recognised”, if by thiswe mean a really identical conception <strong>of</strong> this “nationalisation”among the representatives <strong>of</strong> the various politicaltrends. The mass <strong>of</strong> the peasantry demand the land spontaneously,for they are oppressed by the feudal latifundiaand do not associate the transfer <strong>of</strong> the land <strong>to</strong> the peoplewith any at all definite economic ideas. Among the peasantrythere is only a very urgent demand, born, so <strong>to</strong>speak, from suffering and hardened by long years <strong>of</strong> oppression—ademand for the revival, strengthening, consolidation,and expansion <strong>of</strong> small farming; a demand that thelatter be made predominant, and nothing more. All thatthe peasant visualises is the passing <strong>of</strong> the landlord latifundiain<strong>to</strong> his own hands; in this struggle the peasantclothes his hazy idea <strong>of</strong> the unity <strong>of</strong> all peasants, as a mass,in the phrase: ownership <strong>of</strong> the land by the people. Thepeasant is guided by the instinct <strong>of</strong> the property owner,who is hindered by the endless fragmentation <strong>of</strong> the presentforms <strong>of</strong> medieval landownership and by the impossibility<strong>of</strong> organising the cultivation <strong>of</strong> the soil in a manner thatfully corresponds <strong>to</strong> “property owning” requirements ifall this motley medieval system <strong>of</strong> landownership continues.The economic necessity <strong>of</strong> abolishing landlordism, <strong>of</strong> abolishingalso the “fetters” <strong>of</strong> allotment landownership—suchare the negative concepts which exhaust thepeasant idea <strong>of</strong> nationalisation. What forms <strong>of</strong> landownershipmay eventually be necessary for renovated small farming,which will have digested, so <strong>to</strong> speak, the landlordlatifundia, the peasant does not think about.The negative aspects <strong>of</strong> the concept (or hazy ideas <strong>of</strong>nationalisation undoubtedly also predominate in Narodnikideology, which expresses the demands and the hopes<strong>of</strong> the peasantry. The removal <strong>of</strong> the old obstacles, theclearing out <strong>of</strong> the landlord, the “unfencing” <strong>of</strong> the land,the removal <strong>of</strong> the fetters <strong>of</strong> allotment ownership, the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!