12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AGRARIAN PROGRAMME OF SOCIAL-DEMOCRACY251fundia are keeping the Russian peasantry in a downtroddenstate, and perpetuate, through the labour-service systemand bondage, the most backward forms and methods <strong>of</strong>land cultivation, for that reason both the technical progressand the mental development <strong>of</strong> the mass <strong>of</strong> the peasants arehindered, as also their activity, initiative, and education,which are essential for the economic utilisation <strong>of</strong> a farlarger area <strong>of</strong> the Russian land reserves than is utilised<strong>to</strong>day. For the feudal latifundia and the predominance <strong>of</strong>bondage in agriculture imply also a corresponding politicalsuperstructure—the predominance <strong>of</strong> the Black-Hundredlandlord in the state, the disfranchisement <strong>of</strong> the population,the prevalence <strong>of</strong> Gurko-Lidval methods <strong>of</strong> administration,101 and so on and so forth.That the feudal latifundia in central agricultural Russiaare having a disastrous effect upon the whole socialsystem, upon social development as a whole, upon the entirecondition <strong>of</strong> agriculture, and upon the whole standard<strong>of</strong> living <strong>of</strong> the masses <strong>of</strong> the peasantry, is a matter <strong>of</strong> commonknowledge. I only have <strong>to</strong> refer here <strong>to</strong> the vast Russianeconomic literature which has proved the prevalence inCentral Russia <strong>of</strong> labour-service, bondage, rack rent, “winterhiring”, and other charming aspects <strong>of</strong> medievalism.*The fall <strong>of</strong> serfdom created conditions which (as I pointedout in detail in The Development <strong>of</strong> Capitalism) causedthe population <strong>to</strong> flee from those haunts <strong>of</strong> the last descendants<strong>of</strong> the serf-owners. The population fled from the centralagricultural area <strong>to</strong> the industrial gubernias, <strong>to</strong> thecapitals, and <strong>to</strong> the southern and eastern borderlands <strong>of</strong>European Russia, and settled in hither<strong>to</strong> uninhabitedlands. In the pamphlet I have mentioned, Mr. Mertvagoquite truly remarks, by the way, that the conception <strong>of</strong>what sort <strong>of</strong> land is unsuitable for agriculture is liable <strong>to</strong>undergo rapid change.“‘The Taurida steppes,’” he writes, “‘owing <strong>to</strong> the climateand the scarcity <strong>of</strong> water, will always be one <strong>of</strong> thepoorest and least suitable regions for cultivation.’ That* See The Development <strong>of</strong> Capitalism, Chapter III, on the transitionfrom corvée <strong>to</strong> capitalist economy and the spread <strong>of</strong> the labourservicesystem. (See present edition, <strong>Vol</strong>. 3, pp. 191-251.—Ed.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!