12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

328V. I. LENINthe political sphere, a democratic republic represents amore pr<strong>of</strong>ound change than democratic local self-government;the former presupposes (and calls forth) greaterrevolutionary energy, intelligence, and organisation on thepart <strong>of</strong> the large masses <strong>of</strong> the people; it creates traditionswhich it will be far more difficult <strong>to</strong> eradicate. Thatis why, for instance, present-day Social-Democrats attachso much value <strong>to</strong> the great fruits <strong>of</strong> the French Revolutionin spite <strong>of</strong> all the res<strong>to</strong>rations that have taken place, andin this they differ from the Cadets (and from Cadet-mindedSocial-Democrats?) who prefer democratic Zemstvosunder a monarchy as a “guarantee against res<strong>to</strong>ration”.In the economic sphere, nationalisation in a bourgeoisagrarian revolution is more far-reaching than anything else,because it breaks up all the medieval forms <strong>of</strong> landownership.At the present time the peasant farms his own strip<strong>of</strong> allotment land, a strip <strong>of</strong> rented allotment land, a strip<strong>of</strong> rented landlord’s land, and so on. Nationalisation makesit possible <strong>to</strong> tear down all the fences <strong>of</strong> landownership<strong>to</strong> the utmost degree, and <strong>to</strong> “clear” all the land for the newsystem <strong>of</strong> economy suitable <strong>to</strong> the requirements <strong>of</strong> capitalism.Of course, even such a clearing affords no guarantee againsta return <strong>to</strong> the old order; <strong>to</strong> promise the people such a “guaranteeagainst res<strong>to</strong>ration” would be a swindle. But such aclearing <strong>of</strong> the old system <strong>of</strong> landownership will enable thenew system <strong>of</strong> economy <strong>to</strong> become so firmly rooted that areturn <strong>to</strong> the old forms <strong>of</strong> landownership would be extremelydifficult, because no power on earth can arrest thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> capitalism. Under municipalisation, however,a return <strong>to</strong> the old form <strong>of</strong> landownership is easier,because municipalisation perpetuates the “pale <strong>of</strong> settlement”,the boundary that separates medieval landownershipfrom the new, municipalised form. After nationalisation,res<strong>to</strong>ration will have <strong>to</strong> break up millions <strong>of</strong> new, capitalistfarms in order <strong>to</strong> res<strong>to</strong>re the old system <strong>of</strong> landownership.After municipalisation, res<strong>to</strong>ration will not have <strong>to</strong>break up any farms or <strong>to</strong> set up any new land boundaries;all it will have <strong>to</strong> do will be literally <strong>to</strong> sign a paper transferringthe lands owned by the municipality X <strong>to</strong> thenoble landlords Y, Z, etc., or <strong>to</strong> hand over <strong>to</strong> the landlordsthe rent from the “municipalised” lands.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!