12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AGRARIAN PROGRAMME OF SOCIAL-DEMOCRACY311the s<strong>to</strong>ry about a stranger who was present for the firsttime at a discussion between ancient philosophers but remainedsilent all the time. One <strong>of</strong> the philosophers said <strong>to</strong>the stranger: “If you are wise, you are behaving foolishly;if you are a fool, you are behaving wisely.”4. IS THE REPUDIATION OF ABSOLUTE RENT CONNECTEDWITH THE PROGRAMME OF MUNICIPALISATION?Puffed up though Maslov may be with the importance <strong>of</strong>his remarkable discoveries in the sphere <strong>of</strong> political economictheory, he, evidently, has some doubts whether anysuch connection exists. At any rate, in the article quotedabove (Obrazovaniye, No. 2, p. 120) he denies that thereis any connection between municipalisation and the “fact”<strong>of</strong> diminishing returns. That is rather odd: the “law <strong>of</strong>diminishing returns” is connected with the repudiation <strong>of</strong>absolute rent, is connected also with the fight against Narodism,but it is not connected with Maslov’s agrarian programme!The fallacy <strong>of</strong> this opinion that there is no connectionbetween general agrarian theory and Maslov’s Russianagrarian programme can, however, be easily proved by directmeans.The repudiation <strong>of</strong> absolute rent is the repudiation <strong>of</strong>the economic significance <strong>of</strong> private land ownership undercapitalism. Whoever claims that only differential rentexists, inevitably arrives at the conclusion that it makesnot the slightest difference <strong>to</strong> the conditions <strong>of</strong> capitalistfarming and <strong>of</strong> capitalist development whether the landbelongs <strong>to</strong> the state or <strong>to</strong> private persons. In both cases,from the standpoint <strong>of</strong> the theory which repudiates absoluterent, only differential rent exists. Clearly, such a theorymust lead <strong>to</strong> the repudiation <strong>of</strong> the significance <strong>of</strong> nationalisationas a measure which accelerates the development<strong>of</strong> capitalism, clears the path for it, etc. For such a view<strong>of</strong> nationalisation follows from the recognition <strong>of</strong> two forms<strong>of</strong> rent: the capitalist form, i.e., the form which cannotbe eliminated under capitalism even on nationalised land(differential rent), and the non-capitalist form connectedwith monopoly, a form which capitalism does not need andwhich hinders the full development <strong>of</strong> capitalism (absoluterent).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!