12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

324V. I. LENINist landownership <strong>of</strong> the new farmers au<strong>to</strong>matically createsanti-proletarian sentiments and a striving on the part <strong>of</strong>these farmers <strong>to</strong> create new privileges for themselves in theshape <strong>of</strong> right <strong>of</strong> ownership. Hence, the question reducesitself precisely <strong>to</strong> this economic consolidation. The constantfac<strong>to</strong>r counteracting this will be the development<strong>of</strong> capitalism, which increases the superiority <strong>of</strong> large-scaleagriculture and demands constant facility for the “consolidation”<strong>of</strong> small farms in<strong>to</strong> large ones. A temporary fac<strong>to</strong>rcounteracting it will be the land available for colonisationin Russia: consolidating the new economy meansraising the technical level <strong>of</strong> agriculture. And we have alreadyshown that every step forward in agricultural technique“opens up” for Russia more and more new areas <strong>of</strong> landavailable for colonisation.Our examination <strong>of</strong> the second question leads <strong>to</strong> thefollowing deduction: the circumstances under which thenew farmers’ demands for the division <strong>of</strong> the land willovercome all counteracting influences cannot be predictedwith accuracy. Allowance, however, must be made for thefact that capitalist development after the bourgeois revolutionwill inevitably give rise <strong>to</strong> such circumstances.As regards the last question, that concerning the attitude<strong>of</strong> the workers’ party <strong>to</strong>wards the possible demand <strong>of</strong> thenew farmers for the division <strong>of</strong> the land, a very definitereply can be given. The proletariat can and must supportthe militant bourgeoisie when the latter wages a really revolutionarystruggle against feudalism. But it is not forthe proletariat <strong>to</strong> support the bourgeoisie when the latteris becoming quiescent. If it is certain that a vic<strong>to</strong>riousbourgeois revolution in Russia is impossible without thenationalisation <strong>of</strong> the land, then it is still more certainthat a subsequent turn <strong>to</strong>wards the division <strong>of</strong> the landis impossible without a certain amount <strong>of</strong> “res<strong>to</strong>ration”,without the peasantry (or rather, from the point <strong>of</strong> view<strong>of</strong> the presumed relations: farmers) turning <strong>to</strong>wards counterrevolution.The proletariat will uphold the revolutionarytradition against all such strivings and will not assist them.In any case, it would be a great mistake <strong>to</strong> think that,in the event <strong>of</strong> the new farmer class turning <strong>to</strong>wards division<strong>of</strong> the land, nationalisation would be a transient phe-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!