12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

318V. I. LENINgotten that no land nationalisation, no equalised landtenure, will abolish the now fully established fact that thewell-<strong>to</strong>-do peasants in Russia are already farming on capitalistlines. In my Development <strong>of</strong> Capitalism I showedthat, according <strong>to</strong> the statistics <strong>of</strong> the eighties and nineties<strong>of</strong> the last century, about one-fifth <strong>of</strong> the peasant householdsaccount for up <strong>to</strong> half <strong>of</strong> peasant agricultural productionand a much larger share <strong>of</strong> rented land; that the farms<strong>of</strong> these peasants are now commodity-producing farmsrather than natural-economy farms, and that, finally,these peasants cannot exist without a vast army <strong>of</strong> farmhandsand day-labourers.* Among these peasants the elements<strong>of</strong> capitalist rent are taken for granted. These peasantsexpress their interests through the mouths <strong>of</strong> thePeshekhonovs, who “soberly” reject the prohibition <strong>of</strong> hiredlabour as well as “socialisation <strong>of</strong> the land”, who soberlychampion the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> the peasant economic individualismwhich is asserting itself. If, in the u<strong>to</strong>pias <strong>of</strong>the Narodniks, we carefully separate the real economicfac<strong>to</strong>r from the false ideology, we shall see at once that itis precisely the bourgeois peasantry which stands <strong>to</strong> gainmost from the break-up <strong>of</strong> the feudal latifundia, irrespective<strong>of</strong> whether that is carried out by division, nationalisation,or municipalisation. “Loans and grants” from thestate, <strong>to</strong>o, are bound <strong>to</strong> benefit the bourgeois peasantryin the first place. The “peasant agrarian revolution” isnothing but the subordination <strong>of</strong> the whole system <strong>of</strong> landownership<strong>to</strong> the conditions <strong>of</strong> progress and prosperity <strong>of</strong>precisely these capitalist farms.Money rent is the moribund yesterday, which cannotbut die out. Capitalist rent is the nascent <strong>to</strong>morrow, whichcannot but develop under the S<strong>to</strong>lypin expropriation <strong>of</strong>the poor peasants (“under Article 87”), as well as under thepeasant expropriation <strong>of</strong> the richest landlords.7. UNDER WHAT CONDITIONS CAN NATIONALISATIONBE BROUGHT ABOUT?The view is <strong>of</strong>ten met with among <strong>Marx</strong>ists that nationalisationis feasible only at a high stage <strong>of</strong> development<strong>of</strong> capitalism, when it will have fully prepared the con-* See present edition, <strong>Vol</strong>. 3, pp. <strong>13</strong>6-39.—Ed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!