12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

268V. I. LENINkept dinning in<strong>to</strong> the peasants’ ears about the blessings<strong>of</strong> peasant proprie<strong>to</strong>rship. The actual alignment <strong>of</strong> forceson this question has been depicted by such a wealth <strong>of</strong> datathat there can be no doubt as <strong>to</strong> its correctness (from thestandpoint <strong>of</strong> class interests). The Cadet Party in the FirstDuma, when the liberals regarded the revolutionary peopleas a force and tried <strong>to</strong> woo them, was also swept along bythe general current in the direction <strong>of</strong> land nationalisation.As is known, the Cadet Land Bill introduced in the FirstDuma contained a clause about a “state land reserve” <strong>to</strong>include all alienated land and from which land would begranted on long-term leases. Of course, the Cadets in theFirst Duma did not put that demand forward on anygrounds <strong>of</strong> principle—it would be ridiculous <strong>to</strong> speak <strong>of</strong> theCadet Party having principles. No. That demand <strong>of</strong> theliberals sprang up as a feeble echo <strong>of</strong> the demands <strong>of</strong> thepeasant masses. Already in the First Duma the peasantdeputies at once began <strong>to</strong> form a separate political group,and the Land Bill <strong>of</strong> the “104” served as the chief and basicplatform <strong>of</strong> the whole <strong>of</strong> the Russian peasantry, which cameforward as a conscious social force. The speeches <strong>of</strong> thepeasant deputies in the First and Second Dumas and thearticles in the Trudovik papers (Izvestia KrestyanskikhDeputa<strong>to</strong>v, Trudovaya Rossiya) showed that the Bill <strong>of</strong> the104 faithfully expressed the interests and hopes <strong>of</strong> the peasants.That Bill must, therefore, be dealt with in somewhatgreater detail.It is interesting, by the way, <strong>to</strong> look at the composition<strong>of</strong> the group <strong>of</strong> deputies who signed the Bill. In the FirstDuma it was signed by 70 Trudoviks, 17 non-party deputies,8 peasants who supplied no information as <strong>to</strong> their partyaffiliation, 5 Cadets,* 3 Social-Democrats,** and 1 LithuanianAu<strong>to</strong>nomist. In the Second Duma the Bill <strong>of</strong> the“104” had 99 signatures, and after deducting duplicates, 91signatures, namely, 79 Trudoviks, 4 Popular Socialists,2 Socialist-Revolutionaries, 2 deputies from the Cossack* G. Zubchenko, T. <strong>Vol</strong>kov, M. Gerasimov, all peasants;S. Lozhkin, a physician, and Afanasyev, a priest.** An<strong>to</strong>nov, a worker from Perm Gubernia, Yershov, a workerfrom Kazan Gubernia, and V. Churyukov, a worker from MoscowGubernia.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!