12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AGAINST BOYCOTT23<strong>Marx</strong>ists should be able <strong>to</strong> explain <strong>to</strong> the masses duringthe decisive moments <strong>of</strong> their his<strong>to</strong>ry that the direct pathis preferable, should be able <strong>to</strong> help the masses in the strugglefor the choice <strong>of</strong> the direct path, <strong>to</strong> advance slogans forthat struggle, and so on. And only hopeless philistines andthe most obtuse pedants, after the decisive his<strong>to</strong>rical battleswhich determined the zigzag path instead <strong>of</strong> the direc<strong>to</strong>ne were over, could sneer at those who had fought <strong>to</strong> theend for the direct path. It would be like the sneers <strong>of</strong> Germanpolice-minded <strong>of</strong>ficial his<strong>to</strong>rians such as Treitschkeat the revolutionary slogans and the revolutionary directness<strong>of</strong> <strong>Marx</strong> in 1848.<strong>Marx</strong>ism’s attitude <strong>to</strong>wards the zigzag path <strong>of</strong> his<strong>to</strong>ryis essentially the same as its attitude <strong>to</strong>wards compromise.Every zigzag turn in his<strong>to</strong>ry is a compromise, a compromisebetween the old, which is no longer strong enough <strong>to</strong>completely negate the new, and the new, which is not yetstrong enough <strong>to</strong> completely overthrow the old. <strong>Marx</strong>ismdoes not al<strong>to</strong>gether reject compromises. <strong>Marx</strong>ism considersit necessary <strong>to</strong> make use <strong>of</strong> them, but that does notin the least prevent <strong>Marx</strong>ism, as a living and operatinghis<strong>to</strong>rical force, from fighting energetically against compromises.Not <strong>to</strong> understand this seeming contradictionis not <strong>to</strong> know the rudiments <strong>of</strong> <strong>Marx</strong>ism.Engels once expressed the <strong>Marx</strong>ist attitude <strong>to</strong> compromisesvery vividly, clearly, and concisely in an article onthe manifes<strong>to</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Blanquist fugitives <strong>of</strong> the Commune(1874).* These Blanquists wrote in their manifes<strong>to</strong> thatthey accepted no compromises whatever. Engels ridiculedthis manifes<strong>to</strong>. It was not, he said, a question <strong>of</strong> rejectingcompromises <strong>to</strong> which circumstances condemn us (or <strong>to</strong> whichcircumstances compel us—I must beg the reader’s pardonfor being obliged <strong>to</strong> quote from memory, as I am unable<strong>to</strong> check with the original text). It was a question <strong>of</strong> clearlyrealising the true revolutionary aims <strong>of</strong> the proletariat and<strong>of</strong> being able <strong>to</strong> pursue them through all and every circumstances,zigzags, and compromises. 10* This article was included in the German volume <strong>of</strong> collectedarticles Internationales aus dem “<strong>Vol</strong>ksstaat”. The title <strong>of</strong> the Russiantranslation is Articles from “<strong>Vol</strong>ksstaat”, published by Znaniye.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!