12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AGRARIAN PROGRAMME OF SOCIAL-DEMOCRACY347within the whole <strong>of</strong> their own quasi-socialism. A favourableoutcome <strong>of</strong> the peasant revolution, in the opinion <strong>of</strong>the Narodniks, would mean the triumph <strong>of</strong> Narodnik socialismin Russia. Actually, such an outcome would be thequickest and most decisive bankruptcy <strong>of</strong> Narodnik (peasant)socialism. The fuller and the more decisive the vic<strong>to</strong>ry<strong>of</strong> the peasant revolution, the sooner will the peasantrybe converted in<strong>to</strong> free, bourgeois farmers, who will“give the sack” <strong>to</strong> Narodnik “socialism”. On the other hand,an unfavourable outcome would prolong the agony <strong>of</strong> Narodniksocialism for some time, making it possible <strong>to</strong> someextent <strong>to</strong> maintain the illusion that criticism <strong>of</strong> the landlord-bourgeoisvariety <strong>of</strong> capitalism is criticism <strong>of</strong> capitalismin general.Social-Democracy, the party <strong>of</strong> the proletariat, does notin any way link the destiny <strong>of</strong> socialism with either <strong>of</strong> thepossible outcomes <strong>of</strong> the bourgeois revolution. Either outcomeimplies the development <strong>of</strong> capitalism and the oppression<strong>of</strong> the proletariat, whether under a landlord monarchywith private ownership <strong>of</strong> land, or under a farmers’ republic,even with the nationalisation <strong>of</strong> the land. Therefore,only an absolutely independent and purely proletarianparty is able <strong>to</strong> defend the cause <strong>of</strong> socialism “whateverthe situation <strong>of</strong> democratic agrarian reforms”* may be,as the concluding part <strong>of</strong> my agrarian programme declares(that part was incorporated in the resolution on tactics <strong>of</strong>the S<strong>to</strong>ckholm Congress).(2) But the bourgeois nature <strong>of</strong> both possible outcomes<strong>of</strong> the agrarian revolution by no means implies that Social-Democrats can be indifferent <strong>to</strong> the struggle for one orthe other outcome. It is undoubtedly in the interests <strong>of</strong>the working class <strong>to</strong> give the most vigorous support <strong>to</strong> thepeasant revolution. More than that: it must play the leadingpart in that revolution. In fighting for a favourableoutcome <strong>of</strong> the revolution we must spread among the massesa very clear understanding <strong>of</strong> what keeping <strong>to</strong> the landlordpath <strong>of</strong> agrarian evolution means, what incalculablehardships (arising not from capitalism, but from the inadequatedevelopment <strong>of</strong> capitalism) it has in s<strong>to</strong>re for all* See present edition, <strong>Vol</strong>. 10, p. 195.—Ed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!