12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AGAINST BOYCOTT33<strong>of</strong> constitutional illusions, is also necessary at the end<strong>of</strong> this period? That would be a “bright idea” in the vein<strong>of</strong> “analogical sociology” and not a serious conclusion. Boycottcannot now have the same meaning that it had at thebeginning <strong>of</strong> the Russian revolution. Today we can neitherwarn the people against constitutional illusions nor fight<strong>to</strong> prevent the revolution from being turned in<strong>to</strong> the constitutional-monarchistblind alley. Boycott cannot haveits former vital spark. If there should be a boycott, it willin any case have a different significance, it will be filledin any case with a different political content.Moreover, our analysis <strong>of</strong> the his<strong>to</strong>rical peculiarity <strong>of</strong>the boycott provides one consideration against a boycott<strong>of</strong> the Third Duma. In the period at the beginning <strong>of</strong> theconstitutional turn the attention <strong>of</strong> the whole nation wasinevitably focused on the Duma. By means <strong>of</strong> the boycottwe fought and were bound <strong>to</strong> fight against this focusing<strong>of</strong> attention on the trend <strong>to</strong>wards the blind alley, <strong>to</strong> fightagainst an infatuation that was due <strong>to</strong> ignorance, unenlightenment,weakness, or selfish counter-revolutionary activity.Today not only any nation-wide, but even any at allwidespread enthusiasm for the Duma in general or for theThird Duma in particular is completely ruled out. There isno need for any boycott here.IVAnd so the conditions for the applicability <strong>of</strong> a boycottshould be sought, undoubtedly, in the objective state<strong>of</strong> affairs at the given moment. Comparing, from this point<strong>of</strong> view, the autumn <strong>of</strong> 1907 with that <strong>of</strong> 1905, we cannothelp coming <strong>to</strong> the conclusion that we have no grounds<strong>to</strong>day for proclaiming a boycott. <strong>From</strong> the standpoint <strong>of</strong>the relation between the direct revolutionary path and theconstitutional-monarchist “zigzag”, from the standpoint <strong>of</strong>mass upswing, and from the standpoint <strong>of</strong> the specific aims<strong>of</strong> the fight against constitutional illusions, the presentstate <strong>of</strong> affairs differs sharply from that <strong>of</strong> two years ago.At that time the monarchist-constitutional turn <strong>of</strong> his<strong>to</strong>rywas nothing more than a police promise. Now it is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!