12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

380V. I. LENINthe big owners with over 50 dessiatins have very muchland, namely, 79,440,000 dessiatins” (March 26, 1907,p. 1088—the peasant points <strong>to</strong> the latifundia <strong>to</strong> prove thenecessity <strong>of</strong> doing away with them; the liberal does so <strong>to</strong>prove that it is necessary <strong>to</strong> cringe). Shingaryov thinks itwould be “an immense disaster” if the people themselves<strong>to</strong>ok the land (<strong>13</strong>55). Rodichev warbles: “We do not fomentclass enmity. We would like <strong>to</strong> forget the past” (632, May 16,1907). Kapustin follows suit: “Our task is <strong>to</strong> sow everywherepeace and justice and not <strong>to</strong> sow and foment class enmity”(1810, April 9). Krupensky is indignant at the speech <strong>of</strong>the Socialist-Revolutionary Zimin because it was “full<strong>of</strong> hatred <strong>to</strong>wards the propertied classes” (783, March 19).In short, in condemning the class struggle, the Cadets andthe Rights are at one. But the Rights know what they aredoing. The preaching <strong>of</strong> class struggle cannot but be harmfuland dangerous <strong>to</strong> the class against which the struggleis directed. The Rights are faithfully guarding the interests<strong>of</strong> the feudal landlords. And what <strong>of</strong> the Cadets? Theyare waging a struggle—they say they are waging a struggle!—theywant <strong>to</strong> “compel” the landlords who are in power,and yet they condemn the class struggle! Did the bourgeoisiethat really fought instead <strong>of</strong> acting as lackeys <strong>of</strong> thelandlords behave in that way, for instance in France? Didnot that bourgeoisie call upon the people <strong>to</strong> fight; did itnot foment class enmity? Did it not create a theory <strong>of</strong> theclass struggle?3. THE RIGHT PEASANTSActual Right peasants are <strong>to</strong> be found in the Second Dumaonly by way <strong>of</strong> exception—Remenchik (Minsk Gubernia)is one, perhaps the only one, who will not hear <strong>of</strong> any villagecommunes or “land funds” and s<strong>to</strong>utly defends privateownership (in the First Duma there were many Polish andWest-Russian peasants who s<strong>to</strong>od for ownership). Buteven Remenchik is in favour <strong>of</strong> alienation “at a fair price”(648), i.e., he in effect turns out <strong>to</strong> be a Cadet. We placethe other “Right peasants” in the Second Duma in a specialgroup because they are-undoubtedly more Left than theCadets. Take Petrochenko (Vitebsk Gubernia). He beginsby saying that he “will defend tsar and country un<strong>to</strong> death”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!