12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

382V. I. LENINFROM MARXTO MAOcome on <strong>to</strong> this rostrum and say that they are willing <strong>to</strong>cede land <strong>to</strong> the peasants at a fair valuation, and then ourpeasants will, <strong>of</strong> course, say thank you, and I think ourFather the Tsar, will also say thank you. As for those landlordswho refuse <strong>to</strong> do this, I propose that the Duma imposea progressive tax on their land, and undoubtedly they<strong>to</strong>o will yield in time, because they will learn that theyhave bitten <strong>of</strong>f more than they can chew” (1617).By compulsory alienation and fair valuation this Rightpeasant means something entirely different from what theCadets have in mind. The Cadets are deceiving not onlythe Left peasants but also the Right. What the Right peasants’attitude <strong>to</strong>wards the Cadet plans for setting up theland committees (according <strong>to</strong> Kutler, or according <strong>to</strong> Chup-⋆rov: see The Agrarian Question, <strong>Vol</strong>. II) would have been,had they studied them, is evident from the following proposalmade by the peasant Melnik (Oc<strong>to</strong>brist, Minsk Gubernia).“I consider it a duty,” he said, “that 60 per cent<strong>of</strong> the members <strong>of</strong> the committee [agrarian] should be peasantswho have practical acquaintance with want [!] andare familiar with the conditions <strong>of</strong> the peasant class, andnot peasants who, perhaps, are peasants only in name. Thisis a question <strong>of</strong> the peasants’ welfare and <strong>of</strong> the poor peoplegenerally, and has NOT no political FOR significance whatever. Peoplemust be chosen who can settle the question practicallyand not politically for the good <strong>of</strong> the people” (1285). TheseRight peasantsCOMMERCIALwill go a long way <strong>to</strong> the Left when thecounter-revolution reveals <strong>to</strong> them the political significance<strong>of</strong> “the questions DISTRIBUTIONthat concern the welfare <strong>of</strong> the poorpeople”!To show how infinitely wide apart are the representatives<strong>of</strong> the monarchist peasantry and the representatives <strong>of</strong> themonarchist bourgeoisie, I shall quote passages from thespeech delivered by the “Progressist” Rev. Tikhvinsky,who sometimes spoke in the name <strong>of</strong> the Peasant Union andTrudovik Group. “Our peasants, in the mass, love the tsar,”he said. “How I wish I had the cap <strong>of</strong> invisibility and couldfly on a magic carpet <strong>to</strong> the foot <strong>of</strong> the throne and say:Sire, your chief enemy, the chief enemy <strong>of</strong> the people, isthe irresponsible ministry.... All that the <strong>to</strong>iling peasantrydemands is the strict application <strong>of</strong> the principle: ‘All

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!