12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AGRARIAN PROGRAMME OF SOCIAL-DEMOCRACY317By money rent <strong>Marx</strong> means the payment by the peasant<strong>to</strong> the landlord <strong>of</strong> the whole <strong>of</strong> the surplus product in theform <strong>of</strong> money. The original form <strong>of</strong> the peasant’s economicdependence upon the landlord under the pre-capitalistmodes <strong>of</strong> production was labour rent (Arbeitsrente), i.e.,corvée then came rent in the form <strong>of</strong> produce, or rent inkind, and finally came money rent. That rent, says A. Finn,“is the most widespread form in our country even <strong>to</strong>day”(p. 63).Undoubtedly, tenant farming based on servitude andbondage is extremely widespread in Russia, and, according<strong>to</strong> <strong>Marx</strong>’s theory, the payment which the peasant makesunder such a system <strong>of</strong> tenancy is largely money rent. Whatpower makes it possible <strong>to</strong> ex<strong>to</strong>rt that rent from the peasantry?The power <strong>of</strong> the bourgeoisie and <strong>of</strong> developingcapitalism? Not at all. It is the power <strong>of</strong> the feudal latifundia.Since the latter will be broken up—and that is thestarting-point and fundamental condition <strong>of</strong> the peasantagrarian revolution—there is no reason <strong>to</strong> speak <strong>of</strong> “moneyrent” in the pre-capitalist sense. Hence, the only significance<strong>of</strong> Finn’s argument is that he emphasises once morethe absurdity <strong>of</strong> separating the peasant allotment land fromthe rest <strong>of</strong> the land in the event <strong>of</strong> an agrarian revolution;since allotment lands are <strong>of</strong>ten surrounded by landlords’lands, and since the present conditions <strong>of</strong> demarcation <strong>of</strong>the peasant lands from the landlords’ lands give rise <strong>to</strong>bondage, the preservation <strong>of</strong> this demarcation is reactionary.Unlike either division <strong>of</strong> the land or nationalisation,municipalisation preserves this demarcation.Of course, the existence <strong>of</strong> small landed property, or,more correctly, <strong>of</strong> small farming, introduces certain changesin the general propositions <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> capitalistrent, but it does not destroy that theory. For example, <strong>Marx</strong>points out that absolute rent as such does not usually existunder small farming, which is carried on mainly <strong>to</strong> meetthe needs <strong>of</strong> the farmer himself (<strong>Vol</strong>. III, 2. Teil, S. 339,344). 128 But the more commodity production develops,the more all the propositions <strong>of</strong> economic theory becomeapplicable <strong>to</strong> peasant farming also, since it has come underthe conditions <strong>of</strong> the capitalist world. It must not be for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!