12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REVOLUTION AND COUNTER-REVOLUTION117“errors <strong>of</strong> the revolution” becomes patently obvious whenwe compare the two periods <strong>of</strong> the revolution. The proletarianmass struggle won gains for the whole people. Theliberal leadership <strong>of</strong> the movement produced nothing butdefeats. The revolutionary onslaught <strong>of</strong> the proletariatsteadily raised the political consciousness <strong>of</strong> the massesand their organisation. It set increasingly higher aimsbefore them, stimulated their independent participationin political life, and taught them how <strong>to</strong> fight. The hegemony<strong>of</strong> the liberals during the period <strong>of</strong> the two Dumas loweredthe political consciousness <strong>of</strong> the masses, demoralised theirrevolutionary organisation, and dulled their comprehension<strong>of</strong> democratic aims.The liberal leaders <strong>of</strong> the First and Second Dumas gavethe people a splendid demonstration <strong>of</strong> slavish legal “struggle”,as a result <strong>of</strong> which the au<strong>to</strong>cratic advocates <strong>of</strong> serfdomswept away the constitutional paradise <strong>of</strong> the liberal windbagswith a stroke <strong>of</strong> the pen and ridiculed the subtle diplomacy<strong>of</strong> the visi<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> ministerial ante-rooms. The liberalshave not a single gain <strong>to</strong> show throughout the Russianrevolution, not a single success, not a single attempt,at all democratic, <strong>to</strong> organise the forces <strong>of</strong> the people in thestruggle for freedom.Until Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 1905, the liberals sometimes maintained abenevolent neutrality <strong>to</strong>wards the revolutionary struggle<strong>of</strong> the masses, but already at that time they had begun <strong>to</strong>oppose it, sending a deputation <strong>to</strong> the tsar with abjectspeeches and supporting the Bulygin Duma not out <strong>of</strong>thoughtlessness, but out <strong>of</strong> sheer hostility <strong>to</strong> the revolution.After Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 1905, all that the liberals did was <strong>to</strong> shamefullybetray the cause <strong>of</strong> the people’s freedom.In November 1905, they sent Mr. Struve <strong>to</strong> have an intimatetalk with Mr. Witte. In the spring <strong>of</strong> 1906, theyundermined the revolutionary boycott, and by refusing <strong>to</strong>speak out openly against the loan for Europe <strong>to</strong> hear,helped the government <strong>to</strong> obtain millions <strong>of</strong> rubles for theconquest <strong>of</strong> Russia. In the summer <strong>of</strong> 1906, they carriedon backdoor haggling with Trepov 68 over ministerial portfoliosand fought the “Left”, i.e., the revolution, in the FirstDuma. January 1907 saw them running again <strong>to</strong> the policeauthorities (Milyukov’s call on S<strong>to</strong>lypin). In the spring

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!