12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AGRARIAN PROGRAMME OF SOCIAL-DEMOCRACY369fantasy. It is an instructive his<strong>to</strong>rical example. And theRussian peasant will not follow in the footsteps <strong>of</strong> Pugachovand Stenka Razin <strong>13</strong>4 with the cry ‘saryn na kichku!’ <strong>13</strong>5[Don’t be <strong>to</strong>o sure <strong>of</strong> that, Count!] He will follow the onlytrue road, the road that was taken by all the civilised nations,the road taken by his neighbours in Western Europe,and, lastly, the road taken by our Polish brothers, by theWest-Russian peasants, who have already realised howdisastrous is the commune and homestead strip system <strong>of</strong>ownership, and in some places have already begun <strong>to</strong> introducethe khu<strong>to</strong>r system” (1296). Count Bobrinsky goeson <strong>to</strong> say; and rightly, that “this road was indicated in1861, when the peasants were freed from serf dependence”.He advises the government not <strong>to</strong> grudge “tens <strong>of</strong> millions”for the purpose <strong>of</strong> “creating a well-<strong>to</strong>-do class <strong>of</strong> peasantproprie<strong>to</strong>rs”.He declares: “This, gentlemen, in generaloutline, is our agrarian programme. It is not a programme<strong>of</strong> election and propaganda promises. It is not a programmefor breaking up the existing social and juridical norms[it is a programme for forcibly getting rid <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong>peasants]; it is not a programme <strong>of</strong> dangerous fantasies,it is a quite practicable programme [that is still open <strong>to</strong>question] and one that has been well-tried [what is trueis true]. And it is high time <strong>to</strong> abandon dreams about somesort <strong>of</strong> economic exceptionalism <strong>of</strong> the Russian nation....But how are we <strong>to</strong> explain the fact that quite impracticableBills, like that <strong>of</strong> the Trudovik Group and that <strong>of</strong> the Party<strong>of</strong> People’s Freedom, have been introduced in a seriouslegislative assembly? No parliament in the world hasever heard <strong>of</strong> all the land being taken over by the state,or <strong>of</strong> the land being taken from Paul and given <strong>to</strong> Peter....The appearance <strong>of</strong> these Bills is the result <strong>of</strong> bewilderment”(a fine explanation!).... “And so, Russian peasants, you have<strong>to</strong> choose between two roads: one road is broad and lookseasy—that is the road <strong>of</strong> usurpation and compulsory alienation,for which calls have been made here. That road isattractive at first, it runs downhill, but it ends in a precipice[for the landlords?], and spells ruin <strong>to</strong> the peasantryand the entire state. The other road is narrow and thorny,and runs uphill, but it leads <strong>to</strong> the summits <strong>of</strong> truth, right,and lasting prosperity” (1299).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!