12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

56V. I. LENINocrat. A spectacle almost more revolting than that <strong>of</strong>feredby the feats <strong>of</strong> Dubasov and S<strong>to</strong>lypin....“Heyden was a ‘man’”—exclaims the drawing-room democratwith enthusiasm. “Heyden was humane.”This sentimentalising over Heyden’s humaneness remindsus not only <strong>of</strong> Nekrasov and Saltykov, but also <strong>of</strong> Turgenevin his A Hunter’s Sketches. Here we find depicted a civilisededucated landlord, a cultured man with a Europeanpolish well versed in the social graces. The landlord is treatinghis guest with wine and conversing on l<strong>of</strong>ty themes.“Why hasn’t the wine been warmed?”—he asks the lackey.The lackey turns pale and does not answer. The landlordrings, and when the servant enters, he says, without raisinghis voice, “About Fyodor ... make the necessary arrangements.”Here you have an example <strong>of</strong> Heyden-like “humaneness”,or humaneness à la Heyden. Turgenev’s landlord 27 is “humane”<strong>to</strong>o, ... so humane, compared with Saltychikha, 28for instance, that he does not go <strong>to</strong> the stables in person <strong>to</strong>see that it has been arranged for Fyodor <strong>to</strong> be flogged. Heis so humane that he does not see <strong>to</strong> it that the birch withwhich Fyodor is <strong>to</strong> be flogged has been soaked in salt water.He would never think <strong>of</strong> hitting or scolding a lackey, couldthis landlord; he only “arranges things” from a distance,like the educated man he is, in a gentle and humane manner,without noise, without fuss, without making a “publicscene”....Heyden’s humaneness was <strong>of</strong> exactly the same kind. Hehimself did not join the Luzhenovskys and Filonovs in floggingand maltreating the peasants. He did not join theRennenkampfs and Meller-Zakomelskys in their punitiveexpeditions. 29 He did not join Dubasov in his Moscowshootings. So humane was he that he refrained from suchactions, leaving all the “arrangements” <strong>to</strong> these heroes<strong>of</strong> the national “stable” and controlling from his peacefuland cultured study the political party which supported thegovernment <strong>of</strong> the Dubasovs and whose leaders drank thehealth <strong>of</strong> the conqueror <strong>of</strong> Moscow, Dubasov.... Was it notindeed humane <strong>to</strong> send the Dubasovs “<strong>to</strong> arrange aboutFyodor” instead <strong>of</strong> going <strong>to</strong> the stables himself? To the oldwomen who run the political department <strong>of</strong> our liberal and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!