12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AGRARIAN PROGRAMME OF SOCIAL-DEMOCRACY397about the right <strong>to</strong> work and the speeches about the right<strong>to</strong> work delivered by the French petty-bourgeois democrats<strong>of</strong> 1848? Both are certainly declamations <strong>of</strong> a bourgeoisdemocrat vaguely expressing the real his<strong>to</strong>rical content<strong>of</strong> the struggle. The declamations <strong>of</strong> the Trudovik, however,vaguely express the actual aims <strong>of</strong> the bourgeois revolutionwhich objective conditions make possible (i.e., make possiblea peasant agrarian revolution in twentieth-centuryRussia), whereas the declamations <strong>of</strong> the French Kleinbürger*in 1848 vaguely expressed the aims <strong>of</strong> the socialistrevolution, which was impossible in France in the middle<strong>of</strong> the last century. In other words: the right <strong>to</strong> work demandedby the French workers in the middle <strong>of</strong> the nineteenthcentury expressed a desire <strong>to</strong> remodel the whole <strong>of</strong> smallproduction on the lines <strong>of</strong> co-operation, socialism, and s<strong>of</strong>orth, and that was economically impossible. The right <strong>to</strong>work demanded by the Russian peasants in the twentiethcentury expresses the desire <strong>to</strong> remodel small agriculturalproduction on nationalised land, and that is economicallyquite possible. The twentieth century Russian peasants’“right <strong>to</strong> work” has a real bourgeois content in addition <strong>to</strong>its unsound socialistic theory. The right <strong>to</strong> work demandedby the French petty bourgeois and worker in the middle<strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century contained nothing but an unsoundsocialistic theory. That is the difference that many <strong>of</strong> our<strong>Marx</strong>ists overlook.But the Trudovik himself reveals the real content <strong>of</strong> histheory: not everybody will go on the land, although everybody“has an equal right”. Clearly, only farmers will go onthe land, or establish themselves there. Doing away withprivate ownership <strong>of</strong> the land means doing away with allobstacles <strong>to</strong> the farmers establishing themselves on the land.It is not surprising that Kiselyov, imbued with deepfaith in the peasant revolution and with a desire <strong>to</strong> serveit, speaks scornfully about the Cadets, about their wish <strong>to</strong>alienate not all, but only a part <strong>of</strong> the land, <strong>to</strong> make thepeasants pay for the land, <strong>to</strong> transfer the matter <strong>to</strong> “unnamedland institutions”, in short, about “the plucked birdwhich the Party <strong>of</strong> People’s Freedom is <strong>of</strong>fering the peas-* Kleinbürger—petty bourgeois.—Ed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!