12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AGRARIAN PROGRAMME OF SOCIAL-DEMOCRACY403semi-feudal stagnation <strong>of</strong> “possessional” production. <strong>13</strong>9aNeither the S<strong>to</strong>lypin nor the Cadet agrarian policy can bringabout any appreciable improvement in the conditions <strong>of</strong> life<strong>of</strong> the masses, and unless these conditions are improved, really“free” industry will not develop in the Urals. Only a peasantrevolution could quickly transform wooden Russiain<strong>to</strong> iron Russia. The Socialist-Revolutionary peasant has atruer and broader conception <strong>of</strong> the conditions necessaryfor the development <strong>of</strong> capitalism than have the swornservants <strong>of</strong> capital.Another Socialist-Revolutionary, the peasant Khvorostukhin(Sara<strong>to</strong>v Gubernia), said: “Yes, gentlemen, <strong>of</strong>course, many spokesmen <strong>of</strong> the Party <strong>of</strong> People’s Freedomhave accused the Trudovik Group <strong>of</strong> wanting <strong>to</strong> transferthe land <strong>to</strong> those who wish <strong>to</strong> till it. They say that then alot <strong>of</strong> people will leave the <strong>to</strong>wns, and this will make thingsworse. But I think, gentlemen, that only those who havenothing <strong>to</strong> do will leave the <strong>to</strong>wns, but those who havework are used <strong>to</strong> work, and since they have work theywill not leave the <strong>to</strong>wns. Indeed, why should land be given<strong>to</strong> those who do not want <strong>to</strong> cultivate it?”... (774.) Is it no<strong>to</strong>bvious that this “S.R.” does not in the least want universal,equalised land tenure, but the creation <strong>of</strong> free andequal farming on free land?... “It is necessary, at all costs,<strong>to</strong> release economic freedom for the whole people, particularlyfor the people who have suffered and starved forso many years” (777).Do not think that this correct formulation <strong>of</strong> the realcontent <strong>of</strong> S.R.-ism (“release economic freedom”) is dueonly <strong>to</strong> the clumsy, peasant way <strong>of</strong> expression. It is morethan that. The S.R. leader Mushenko, an intellectual,who replied <strong>to</strong> the debate on the agrarian question on behalf<strong>of</strong> the Socialist-Revolutionary Party, was far morenaïve in expressing his economic views than the peasantsKabakov and Khvorostukhin.“We say,” declared Mushenko, “that proper resettlement, properdispersion, will be possible only when the land is unfenced, when allthe barriers erected by the principle <strong>of</strong> private ownership <strong>of</strong> the landare removed. Further, the Minister spoke about the increase in thepopulation <strong>of</strong> our country.... It turned out that for this increase alone[1,600,000] about 3,500,000 dessiatins <strong>of</strong> land will be needed. Hesays: Thus, if you have equalised the land, where will you get land

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!