12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

252V. I. LENINwas the opinion expressed in 1845 by such authoritativeobservers <strong>of</strong> nature as Academicians Beer and Helmersen.At that time the population <strong>of</strong> Taurida Gubernia, a half<strong>of</strong> what it is now, produced 1,800,000 chetverts <strong>of</strong> grain<strong>of</strong> all kinds.... Now, after a lapse <strong>of</strong> 60 years, the populationhas doubled, and in 1903, it produced 17,600,000 chetverts,i.e., nearly ten times as much” (p. 24).That is true not only <strong>of</strong> Taurida Gubernia, but <strong>of</strong> a number<strong>of</strong> other gubernias in the southern and eastern borderlands<strong>of</strong> European Russia. The southern steppes, and alsothe gubernias on the left bank <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Vol</strong>ga, which in thesixties and seventies lagged behind the central black-earthgubernias in the output <strong>of</strong> grain, outstripped those provincesin the eighties (The Development <strong>of</strong> Capitalism, p. 186).*Between 1863 and 1897 the population <strong>of</strong> the whole <strong>of</strong>European Russia increased by 53 per cent—48 per centin the case <strong>of</strong> the rural and 97 per cent in the case <strong>of</strong> theurban population—whereas in Novorossia, the Lower <strong>Vol</strong>ga,and eastern gubernias, the population increased during thesame period by 92 per cent—87 per cent increase in the ruralpopulation and <strong>13</strong>4 per cent increase in the urban population(ibid., p. 446).**“We have no doubt,” Mr. Mertvago continues, “thatthe present bureaucratic estimate <strong>of</strong> the economic importance<strong>of</strong> our land reserves is not less mistaken than that<strong>of</strong> Beer and Helmersen concerning Taurida Gubernia in1845” (ibid.).That is correct. But Mr. Mertvago fails <strong>to</strong> see the source<strong>of</strong> Beer’s mistakes, and <strong>of</strong> the mistakes <strong>of</strong> all bureaucraticestimates. The source <strong>of</strong> those mistakes is that while takingin<strong>to</strong> consideration the given level <strong>of</strong> technique and culture,no allowance is made for the advance <strong>of</strong> this level.Beer and Helmersen did not foresee the technical changesthat became possible after the fall <strong>of</strong> serfdom. And therecannot be the least doubt now that a tremendous increasein the productive forces, a tremendous rise in the technicaland cultural level will inevitably follow the break-up <strong>of</strong>the feudal latifundia in European Russia.* See present edition, <strong>Vol</strong>. 3, p. 257.—Ed.** See present edition, <strong>Vol</strong>. 3, p. 563-65.—Ed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!