12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

78V. I. LENINtheir campaign for universal suffrage the Austrians tended<strong>to</strong> play down the demand for equal rights <strong>of</strong> men and women;on practical grounds they placed the main emphasis onmale suffrage. Clara Zetkin and other German Social-Democratsrightly pointed out <strong>to</strong> the Austrians that they wereacting incorrectly, and that by failing <strong>to</strong> press the demandthat the vote be granted <strong>to</strong> women as well as men, theywere weakening the mass movement. The concluding words<strong>of</strong> the Stuttgart resolution (“the demand for universalsuffrage should be put forward simultaneously for bothmen and women”) undoubtedly relate <strong>to</strong> this episode <strong>of</strong>excessive “practicalism” in the his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> the Austrian labourmovement.The resolution on the relations between the socialistparties and the trade unions is <strong>of</strong> especial importance <strong>to</strong>us Russians. The S<strong>to</strong>ckholm R.S.D.L.P. Congress went onrecord for non-Party unions, thus endorsing the neutralitystandpoint, which has always been upheld by our non-Party democrats, Bernsteinians and Socialist-Revolutionaries.The London Congress, on the other hand, put forwarda different principle, namely, closer alignment <strong>of</strong>the unions with the Party, even including, under certainconditions, their recognition as Party unions. At Stuttgartin the Social-Democratic subsection <strong>of</strong> the Russian section(the socialists <strong>of</strong> each country form a separate section atinternational congresses) opinion was divided on this issue(there was no split on other issues). Plekhanov upheldthe neutrality principle. Voinov, 43 a Bolshevik, defendedthe anti-neutralist viewpoint <strong>of</strong> the London Congress and<strong>of</strong> the Belgian resolution (published in the Congress materialswith de Brouckère’s report, which will soon appearin Russian). Clara Zetkin rightly remarked in her journalDie Gleichheit 44 that Plekhanov’s arguments for neutralitywere just as lame as those <strong>of</strong> the French. And the Stuttgartresolution—as Kautsky rightly observed and as anyonewho takes the trouble <strong>to</strong> read it carefully will see—putsan end <strong>to</strong> recognition <strong>of</strong> the “neutrality” principle. Thereis not a word in it about neutrality or non-party principles.On the contrary, it definitely recognises the need for closerand stronger connections between the unions and the socialistparties.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!