12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AGRARIAN PROGRAMME OF SOCIAL-DEMOCRACY247and the Cadets, as is frequently and mistakenly assumedby the Mensheviks (who allow themselves <strong>to</strong> be taken inby the sound <strong>of</strong> “constitutional-democratic” words andsubstitute analysis <strong>of</strong> the respective titles <strong>of</strong> the parties fora class analysis). The dividing line runs between the Cadetsand the Trudoviks. That line is determined by the interests<strong>of</strong> the two principal classes in Russian society which arefighting for the land, viz., the landlords and the peasantry.The Cadets stand for the preservation <strong>of</strong> landlordism andfor a civilised, European, but landlord bourgeois evolution<strong>of</strong> agriculture. The Trudoviks (and the Social-Democraticworkers’ deputies), i.e., the representatives <strong>of</strong> the peasantryand the representatives <strong>of</strong> the proletariat, advocate apeasant bourgeois evolution <strong>of</strong> agriculture.A strict distinction must be drawn between the ideologicalcloak <strong>of</strong> the agrarian programmes, their differentpolitical details, etc., and the economic basis <strong>of</strong> those programmes.The present difficulty does not lie in understandingthe bourgeois character <strong>of</strong> the agrarian demands andprogrammes <strong>of</strong> both the landlords and the peasants: thatwas already explained by the <strong>Marx</strong>ists before the revolution,and the revolution has confirmed the correctness <strong>of</strong>their explanation. The difficulty lies in understandingfully the basis <strong>of</strong> the struggle between the two classes withinthe framework <strong>of</strong> bourgeois society and bourgeois evolution.The fact that this struggle is a normal social phenomenonwill not be unders<strong>to</strong>od unless it is seen as partand parcel <strong>of</strong> the objective tendencies <strong>of</strong> the economic development<strong>of</strong> capitalist Russia.Now, having shown the connection between the two types<strong>of</strong> agrarian programmes in the Russian revolution and thetwo types <strong>of</strong> bourgeois agrarian evolution, we must passon <strong>to</strong> the examination <strong>of</strong> a new, extremely important aspect<strong>of</strong> the question.7. RUSSIA’S LAND AREA.THE QUESTION OF THE COLONISATIONWe have pointed out above that on the question <strong>of</strong> capitalismin Russia the economic analysis compels us <strong>to</strong> distinguishbetween the central agricultural provinces with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!