12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

326V. I. LENINbility <strong>of</strong> res<strong>to</strong>ration” (p. 115). Let us examine this key alittle more closely. Here is the first reference <strong>to</strong> it in Plekhanov’sfirst speech:“<strong>Lenin</strong> says, ‘we shall make nationalisation harmless’,but <strong>to</strong> make nationalisation harmless we must find a guaranteeagainst res<strong>to</strong>ration; and there is not, nor can therebe, any such guarantee. Recall the his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> France; recallthe his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> England; in each <strong>of</strong> these countries, the widesweep <strong>of</strong> the revolution was followed by res<strong>to</strong>ration. Thesame may happen in our country; and our programme mustbe such that in the event <strong>of</strong> its application, the harm thatmay be caused by res<strong>to</strong>ration may be reduced <strong>to</strong> a minimum.Our programme must eliminate the economic basis <strong>of</strong> tsarism;but nationalisation <strong>of</strong> the land effected during therevolutionary period does not eliminate that basis. Therefore,I consider that the demand for nationalisation is ananti-revolutionary demand” (p. 44). What the “economicbasis <strong>of</strong> tsarism” is, Plekhanov tells in the same speech:“The situation in our country was such that the land, <strong>to</strong>getherwith its cultiva<strong>to</strong>rs, was held in servitude by the state,and on the basis <strong>of</strong> that servitude Russian despotism developed.To overthrow despotism, it is necessary <strong>to</strong> do awaywith its economic basis. Therefore, I am opposed <strong>to</strong> nationalisationat present” (p. 44).First <strong>of</strong> all, let us examine the logic <strong>of</strong> this argumentabout res<strong>to</strong>ration. First: “there is not, nor can there be,any guarantee against res<strong>to</strong>ration!” Second: “the harmthat may be caused by res<strong>to</strong>ration must be reduced <strong>to</strong> aminimum”. That is <strong>to</strong> say, we must invent a guaranteeagainst res<strong>to</strong>ration, although there cannot be any suchguarantee! And on the very next page, 45 (in the samespeech), Plekhanov finally invents a guarantee: “In theevent <strong>of</strong> res<strong>to</strong>ration,” he plainly says, “it [municipalisation]will not surrender the land [listen!] <strong>to</strong> the politicalrepresentatives <strong>of</strong> the old order.” Thus, although “therecannot be” any such guarantee, a guarantee against res<strong>to</strong>rationhas been found. A very clever conjuring trick, andthe Menshevik press is filled with rapture over the conjurer’sskill.When Plekhanov speaks he is brilliant and witty, hecrackles, twirls, and sparkles like a Catherine-wheel. The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!