12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

406V. I. LENINTo this we will add that the above-mentioned peasantsdemanded additional allotments with right <strong>of</strong> ownership(see, for example, p. 1811). In the First Duma, <strong>to</strong>o, the Polishand Western peasants, in demanding land, spoke infavour <strong>of</strong> private ownership. “I am a peasant with littleland from Lublin Gubernia,” said Nakonieczny on June1, 1906. “Compulsory alienation is needed in Poland as well.One dessiatin forever is better than five dessiatins for anindefinite period” (881-82). The same was said by Ponia<strong>to</strong>wski(<strong>Vol</strong>hynia Gubernia) in the name <strong>of</strong> the WesternRegion (May 19, p. 501), and by Trasun from Vitebsk Gubernia(418, May 16, 1906). Girnius (Suvalki Gubernia)opposed the idea <strong>of</strong> an imperial s<strong>to</strong>ck <strong>of</strong> distributable landand demanded local distributable lands (June 1, 1906,p. 879). During the same debate, Count Tysczkiewiez statedthat he regarded the idea <strong>of</strong> forming a national s<strong>to</strong>ck <strong>of</strong>distributable land as “impracticable and risky” (874).Stecki also spoke (May 24, 1906, pp. 6<strong>13</strong>-14) in favour <strong>of</strong>private ownership as against renting.A speaker from the Baltic Region in the Second Dumawas Juraszewski (Courland Gubernia), who demanded theabolition <strong>of</strong> the feudal privileges <strong>of</strong> the big landowners(May 16, 1907, p. 670) and the alienation <strong>of</strong> all landlords’land over and above a definite norm. “While admittingthat present-day agriculture in the Baltic Region developedon the principle <strong>of</strong> private ownership, or hereditary lease,that was practised there, one must come <strong>to</strong> the conclusion,however, that for the future regulation <strong>of</strong> agriculturalrelations it is necessary immediately <strong>to</strong> introduce inthe Baltic Region local self-government on broad democraticlines which could correctly solve this problem”(672).The representative <strong>of</strong> Estland Gubernia, the ProgressistJurine, introduced a separate Bill for this gubernia (47thsession, May 26, 1907, p. 1210). He spoke in favour <strong>of</strong> a“compromise” (12<strong>13</strong>), in favour <strong>of</strong> “hereditary or perpetualleasing” (1214). “The one who cultivates the land, whomakes the best use <strong>of</strong> it, shall have possession <strong>of</strong> the land”(ibid.). While demanding compulsory alienation for thispurpose, he rejects confiscation <strong>of</strong> the land (1215). In theFirst Duma, Cakste (Courland Gubernia) demanded the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!