12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AGRARIAN PROGRAMME OF SOCIAL-DEMOCRACY309are “intensification”. The reaping-machine and in general“most agricultural machines” represent “technical progress”.Maslov “happened” <strong>to</strong> invent this nonsense because he had<strong>to</strong> find some way <strong>of</strong> wriggling out <strong>of</strong> the “law <strong>of</strong> diminishingreturns”, which technical progress has refuted. Bulgakovwriggled out <strong>of</strong> it by saying: technical progress is temporary,stagnation is constant. Maslov wriggles out <strong>of</strong> it by inventinga most amusing division <strong>of</strong> technical progress in agriculturein<strong>to</strong> “intensification” and “technical implements”.What is intensification? It is the further expenditure<strong>of</strong> labour and capital. A reaping-machine, according <strong>to</strong> thediscovery <strong>of</strong> our great Maslov, is not expenditure<strong>of</strong> capital. A seed-drill is not expenditure <strong>of</strong> capital!“The substitution <strong>of</strong> multiple-crop rotation for the threefieldsystem” is equally applicable in large-scale and insmall farming. That is not true. The introduction <strong>of</strong> multiple-croprotation also calls for additional outlays <strong>of</strong>capital and it is much more applicable in large-scale farming.Incidentally, in this connection see the data on Germanagriculture quoted above (“The Agrarian Question andthe ‘Critics <strong>of</strong> <strong>Marx</strong>’”*). Russian statistics, <strong>to</strong>o, testify <strong>to</strong>the same thing. The slightest reflection would reveal <strong>to</strong> youthat it could not be otherwise; that multiple-crop rotationcannot be applied equally in small and large-scale farming.Nor can increased quantities <strong>of</strong> fertilisers be “equally applicable”,because big farms (1) have more cattle, which is<strong>of</strong> the greatest importance in this respect; (2) feed theircattle better and are not so “sparing” <strong>of</strong> straw, etc.; (3)have better facilities for s<strong>to</strong>ring fertilisers; (4) use largerquantities <strong>of</strong> artificial fertilisers. Maslov, in a really “impudent”way, dis<strong>to</strong>rts well-known data on modern agriculture.Finally, deep ploughing cannot be equally applicablein small and large-scale farming either. It is sufficient<strong>to</strong> point <strong>to</strong> two facts: first, the use <strong>of</strong> steam ploughs is increasingon the large farms (see above-quoted data on Germany;now, probably, electric ploughs <strong>to</strong>o).** Perhapseven Maslov will realise that these cannot be “equally”applicable in large-scale and small farming. In the latter* See present edition, <strong>Vol</strong>. 5, p. 181.—Ed.** Ibid., p. <strong>13</strong>1.—Ed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!