12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 13 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

308V. I. LENINBut that is not all. The revisionists, <strong>to</strong>o, would havebeen right. Here is another argument advanced by ourhome-grown economist:“If I am not mistaken, I [Pyotr Maslov] happened <strong>to</strong> bethe first [that’s the sort <strong>of</strong> fellow I am!] <strong>to</strong> lay specialemphasis on the difference between the significance <strong>of</strong> thecultivation <strong>of</strong> the soil and <strong>of</strong> technical progress for the development<strong>of</strong> farming, and, in particular, for the strugglebetween large-scale and small production. Whereas theintensification <strong>of</strong> agriculture and the further expenditure<strong>of</strong> labour and capital are <strong>to</strong> an equal extent less productiveboth in large-scale and in small farming, technical progress,which increases the productivity <strong>of</strong> labour in agricultureas it does in industry, creates enormous and exceptionaladvantages for large-scale production. These advantagesare determined almost entirely by technical conditions.”... You are muddling things up, my dear man: theadvantages <strong>of</strong> large-scale production in commercial respectsare <strong>of</strong> great importance.... “On the other hand, cultivation <strong>of</strong> the soil can usuallybe applied equally in large-scale and in small farming”....Cultivation <strong>of</strong> the soil “can” be applied.Evidently, our sagacious Maslov knows <strong>of</strong> a type <strong>of</strong> farmingwhich can be conducted without the cultivation <strong>of</strong>the soil.... “For example, the substitution <strong>of</strong> multiple-croprotation for the three-field system, an increase in the quantity<strong>of</strong> fertilisers, deeper ploughing, etc., can be equallyapplied in large-scale and small farming, and equally affectthe productivity <strong>of</strong> labour. But the introduction <strong>of</strong> reaping-machines,for example, increases the productivity <strong>of</strong>labour only on the larger farms, because the small strips<strong>of</strong> grain field can be more conveniently reaped or mown byhand.”...Yes, undoubtedly Maslov was the “first” <strong>to</strong> succeed inintroducing such endless confusion in<strong>to</strong> the question! Justimagine: a steam plough (deeper ploughing) is “cultivation<strong>of</strong> the soil”, a reaping-machine is a “technical implement”.Thus, according <strong>to</strong> the doctrine <strong>of</strong> our incomparable Maslov,a steam plough is not a technical implement; a reapingmachineis not the further expenditure <strong>of</strong> labour and capital.Artificial fertilisers, the steam plough, grass cultivation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!